BACKGROUND
The inadvertent "loss" of surgical sponges, towels, and instruments remains an unsolved problem. The means of preventing this mishap involve an inventory of all implements going in and coming out of the surgical wound, supplemented by a careful search. This work describes a different approach to this problem: tagging articles placed into the wound with markers able to be rapidly detected electronically.
METHODS
Surgical sponges were tagged with either active targets or inert, dummy targets and placed in different locations within the body of 50 cadavers. Using a device we constructed, blinded readings were performed to test the accuracy of detecting retained sponges.
RESULTS
A total of 600 readings were made in 50 cadavers, 300 of active targets and 300 of inert, dummy targets, indistinguishable in appearance. The active markers were detected with 100% accuracy. There were no false positive detections of the dummy tags.
CONCLUSION
The present work demonstrates the feasibility of detecting retained surgical sponges by electronic means blinded to whether the tag contained an active or inert marker.
[1]
A. Hoofwijk,et al.
Halsted Revisited: Internal Mammary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer
,
2001,
Annals of surgery.
[2]
O. Hines,et al.
Gossypiboma of the abdomen.
,
1996,
Archives of surgery.
[3]
K. Maull,et al.
Natural History of the Retained Surgical Sponge
,
1982,
Southern medical journal.
[4]
S. Friedman,et al.
The retained surgical sponge.
,
1996,
Annals of surgery.
[5]
H. S. Crossen,et al.
FOREIGN BODIES LEFT IN THE ABDOMEN
,
1941
.
[6]
E. John Orav,et al.
Risk Factors for Retained Instruments and Sponges after Surgery
,
2003
.
[7]
I. M. Ibrahim,et al.
Retained surgical sponge
,
1995,
Surgical Endoscopy.
[8]
W Rappaport,et al.
The retained surgical sponge following intra-abdominal surgery. A continuing problem.
,
1990,
Archives of surgery.
[9]
A. Rajagopal,et al.
Gossypiboma—“A Surgeon’s Legacy”
,
2002,
Diseases of the colon and rectum.