Roughness-Induced Pavement–Vehicle Interactions

Pavement roughness affects rolling resistance and thus vehicle fuel consumption. When a vehicle travels at constant speed on an uneven road surface, the mechanical work dissipated in the vehicle's suspension system is compensated by vehicle engine power and results in excess fuel consumption. This dissipation depends on both road roughness and vehicle dynamic characteristics. This paper proposes, calibrates, and implements a mechanistic model for roughness-induced dissipation. The distinguishing feature of the model is its combination of a thermodynamic quantity (energy dissipation) with results from random vibration theory to identify the governing parameters that drive the excess fuel consumption caused by pavement roughness, namely, the international roughness index (IRI) and the waviness number, w (a power spectral density parameter). It is shown through sensitivity analysis that the sensitivity of model output, that is, excess fuel consumption, to the waviness number is significant and comparable to that of IRI. Thus, introducing the waviness number as a second roughness index, in addition to IRI, allows a more accurate quantification of the impact of surface characteristics on vehicle fuel consumption and the corresponding greenhouse gas emissions. This aspect is illustrated by application of the roughness–fuel consumption model to two road profiles extracted from FHWA's Long-Term Pavement Performance database.

[1]  Arghavan Louhghalam,et al.  Scaling Relationships of Dissipation-Induced Pavement–Vehicle Interactions , 2014 .

[2]  Karim Chatti,et al.  Estimating the Effects of Pavement Condition on Vehicle Operating Costs , 2012 .

[3]  Arghavan Louhghalam,et al.  Flügge’s Conjecture: Dissipation- versus Deflection-Induced Pavement–Vehicle Interactions , 2014 .

[4]  J. D. Robson,et al.  The description of road surface roughness , 1973 .

[5]  J. D. Robson ROAD SURFACE DESCRIPTION AND VEHICLE RESPONSE , 1979 .

[6]  John C. Dixon,et al.  Tires, Suspension and Handling, Second Edition , 1996 .

[7]  Karim Chatti,et al.  Calibration of HDM-4 Models for Estimating the Effect of Pavement Roughness on Fuel Consumption for U.S. Conditions , 2010 .

[8]  T D Gillespie,et al.  The international road roughness experiment , 1986 .

[9]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Peter Múčka,et al.  Indicators of longitudinal unevenness of roads in the USA , 2008 .

[11]  Steven A. Velinsky,et al.  Increased Vehicle Energy Dissipation Due to Changes in Road Roughness with Emphasis on Rolling Losses , 1979 .

[12]  X-P Lu Effects of Road Roughness on Vehicular Rolling Resistance , 1985 .

[13]  Michael W Gillespie Thomas D Queiroz Cesar A.V Sayers,et al.  The International Road Roughness Experiment (IRRE) : establishing correlation and a calibration standard for measurements , 1986 .

[14]  Igor Rychlik,et al.  Modelling of road profiles using roughness indicators , 2014 .

[15]  C. B. Winkler Evaluation of barrier limit capacity for different classes of vehicles and impact conditions - parameter measurements of: 1978 Honda Civic, 1979 Dodge B-200 Van, 1979 Ford F150 Pickup. Interim report , 1983 .

[16]  Mrcrmsr W. Savnns I On the Calculation of International Roughness Index from Longitudinal Road Profile , 2022 .

[17]  Eul-Bum Lee,et al.  Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emission from pavement rehabilitation with different rolling resistance , 2012 .

[18]  Paul S. Fancher,et al.  A factbook of the mechanical properties of the components for single-unit and articulated heavy trucks. Phase I. Final report , 1986 .