Involvement, Tolerance for Ambiguity, and Type of Service Moderate the Effectiveness of Probability Marker Usage in Service Advertising

Results of two experiments reveal that the use of probability markers in advertisements affects brand attitude and purchase intentions, and that this is moderated by the type of service, customers’ involvement, and their level of tolerance for ambiguity. Services in the study were classified as more or less hedonic/utilitarian, and more or less involving. Probability markers affect consumers’ brand attitude and purchase intentions for less-involving services, while this effect is not significant for more-involving services. In addition, higher tolerance for ambiguity results in preference of hedges over pledges or no probability markers, while for consumers with lower tolerance for ambiguity the opposite holds. With regards to service type, for more-hedonic, less-involving services the use of hedges in advertising copy increases brand attitude and purchase intentions, while for more-utilitarian, less-involving services pledges result in highest levels of brand attitude and purchase intentions.

[1]  Richard Jackson Harris,et al.  Language in Advertising a Psycholinguistic Approach , 2012 .

[2]  M. Geuens,et al.  Emotional advertising: Revisiting the Role of Product Category , 2011 .

[3]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Effects of Hedges in Persuasive Arguments , 2008 .

[4]  Aneta Francová,et al.  Language of Advertising , 2008 .

[5]  J. Matić.  The Degree of Uncertainty Avoidance Present in Croatian and American Undergraduate Students; a Comparative Analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  Sex Differences in Responses to Probability Markers in Advertising Claims , 2006 .

[7]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals , 2005 .

[8]  C. Areni,et al.  Effects of Probability Markers on Advertising Claim Acceptance , 2005 .

[9]  Kevin L. Blankenship,et al.  The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion , 2005 .

[10]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[12]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  The effects of structural and grammatical variables on persuasion: An elaboration likelihood model perspective , 2003 .

[13]  Santoi Leung.  Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use , 2002 .

[14]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  The effects of sales presentation quality and initial perceptions on persuasion: a multiple role perspective , 2002 .

[15]  Jaideep Sengupta,et al.  Effects of Inconsistent Attribute Information on the Predictive Value of Product Attitudes: Toward a Resolution of Opposing Perspectives , 2002 .

[16]  Marla R. Stafford,et al.  A Contingency Approach: The Effects of Spokesperson Type and Service Type on Service Advertising Perceptions , 2002 .

[17]  G. McClelland,et al.  Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models , 2001 .

[18]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Linguistic Power and Persuasion , 1999 .

[19]  Charles S. Areni,et al.  An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion , 1998 .

[20]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  Optimal design in psychological research. , 1997 .

[21]  Marla Royne Stafford.  Tangibility in Services Advertising: An Investigation of Verbal versus Visual Cues , 1996 .

[22]  R. Dale Wilson,et al.  Television Programming and Its Influence on Viewers' Perceptions of Commercials: The Role of Program Arousal and Pleasantness , 1995 .

[23]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications , 1995 .

[24]  Marla Royne Stafford,et al.  Retail Services Advertising: The Effects of Appeal, Medium, and Service , 1995 .

[25]  B. Szuchewycz,et al.  Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence , 1995 .

[26]  J. Zaichkowsky.  The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising , 1994 .

[27]  Ruth Ann Smith.  The Effects of Visual and Verbal Advertising Information on Consumers' Inferences , 1991 .

[28]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[29]  Thomas J. Madden,et al.  Attitude toward the Ad: An Assessment of Diverse Measurement Indices under Different Processing “Sets” , 1988 .

[30]  Dena S Cox,et al.  What Does Familiarity Breed? Complexity as a Moderator of Repetition Effects in Advertisement Evaluation , 1988 .

[31]  L. Cronbach.  Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed , 1987 .

[32]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Effect of Verbal and Visual Components of Advertisements on Brand Attitudes and Attitude Toward the Advertisement , 1986 .

[33]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing , 1985 .

[34]  James J. Bradac,et al.  A Molecular View of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles. , 1984 .

[35]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[36]  J. W. Wright,et al.  Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: The effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression information , 1983 .

[37]  Self-Concept Variables.  Sex Differences in , 2016 .

[38]  B. Banks,et al.  Probability markers in advertising have a different effect on the purchase intention for hedonic and utilitarian low and high involvement services , 2011 .

[39]  Jeffrey L. Herman,et al.  The Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale: Towards a more refined measure for international management research , 2010 .

[40]  S R.,et al.  Style Versus Substance : Multiple Roles of Language Power in Persuasion , 2007 .

[41]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[42]  R. Harris,et al.  The effect of type of claim, gender, and buying history on the drawing of pragmatic inferences from advertising claims , 1993 .

[43]  K. B. Murray,et al.  The impact of services versus goods on consumers’ assessment of perceived risk and variability , 1990 .

[44]  Richard C. Anderson.  The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise , 1977 .