Experimental and computational analysis of soft tissue stiffness in forearm using a manual indentation device.

A hand held stiffness meter can be used to measure indentation stiffness of human soft tissues, sensitively altered, e.g., by pathological tissue swelling. Under indentation load, the relative contribution of each soft tissue component (i.e., skin, adipose tissue and muscle) to the biomechanical response is not known. In the present study, we evaluated the biomechanical role of different soft tissues in relaxed, physically stressed and oedemic human forearm. Soft tissue stiffness of the forearms of nine healthy human subjects was measured under four different test protocols: (1) forearm at rest, (2) forearm under isometric flexor loading, (3) forearm under isometric extensor loading, and (4) forearm under venous occlusion. In (2) and (3) the loading forces were monitored using a dynamometer, and in (4) the soft tissue swelling was induced by venous occlusion using a pressure cuff. At the site of indentation, thickness of different tissue layers (skin, adipose tissue and muscle) was measured using B-mode ultrasound imaging. Layered, hyperelastic finite element (FE) model of the indentation measurement was created and the model response was matched with that of the stiffness meter to determine the elastic modulus for each tissue in the model. Optimized values of the elastic modulus for skin and adipose tissue at rest were 210 kPa and 1.9 kPa, respectively. Further, significance of the variations in stiffness of different tissues on the indentation response was tested. Experimentally, indentation stiffness of the forearm increased during isometric extensor and flexor loads as well as under venous occlusion by 53, 91 and 15%, respectively. The FE model could reproduce the experimental responses primarily by the increased modulus of skin; 112% (446 kPa), 210% (651 kPa) and 21% (254 kPa) under flexor and extensor loading as well as during venous occlusion, respectively. The indentation response was 9-16 times more sensitive to changes in the mechanical properties of skin than those of adipose tissue and muscle. In conclusion, the present stiffness meter may be used to quantify in vivo mechanical properties of soft tissues in the forearm, sensitively modulated by soft tissue swelling and muscle loading.

[1]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing--a material sensitivity study. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Creating and simulating skeletal muscle from the visible human data set , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  M. Doblaré,et al.  A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  C. G. Lyons,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of passive skeletal muscle in compression: stress-relaxation behaviour and constitutive modelling. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  A F Mak,et al.  Objective assessment of limb tissue elasticity: development of a manual indentation procedure. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Paul Ackermans,et al.  In vitro indentation to determine the mechanical properties of epidermis. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  M P Nash,et al.  A biomechanical model of mammographic compressions , 2008, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[8]  François Hug,et al.  Muscle shear elastic modulus measured using supersonic shear imaging is highly related to muscle activity level. , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  Cwj Cees Oomens,et al.  A numerical‐experimental method to characterize the non‐linear mechanical behaviour of human skin , 2003, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[10]  G. Baroud,et al.  Material properties of the human calcaneal fat pad in compression: experiment and theory. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. Sanders,et al.  Torsional elasticity of human skin in vivo , 1973, Pflügers Archiv.

[12]  F Patat,et al.  An in vivo method for measuring the mechanical properties of the skin using ultrasound. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  R. Vargiolu,et al.  Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests , 2009, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[14]  W. Smutz,et al.  Modeling of time-dependent force response of fingertip to dynamic loading. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  P. Nielsen,et al.  Mechanical characterisation of in vivo human skin using a 3D force-sensitive micro-robot and finite element analysis , 2011, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[16]  K. Schindhelm,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic properties of porcine subdermal fat using MRI and inverse FEA , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[17]  S R Taylor,et al.  Nonuniform volume changes during muscle contraction. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Towards Tracking Breast Cancer Across Medical Images Using Subject-Specific Biomechanical Models , 2007, MICCAI.

[19]  F. Charleux,et al.  In vivo characterization of the mechanical properties of human skin derived from MRI and indentation techniques , 2007, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[20]  J. Blackburn,et al.  Sex comparison of hamstring structural and material properties. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Mathias Fink,et al.  Human muscle hardness assessment during incremental isometric contraction using transient elastography. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  D. Plewes,et al.  Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  R E Baier,et al.  Mechanical characteristics of human skin subjected to static versus cyclic normal pressures. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  Cormac Flynn,et al.  Finite element modelling of forearm skin wrinkling , 2008, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[25]  J. Lagarde,et al.  Model of the viscoelastic behaviour of skin in vivo and study of anisotropy , 2004, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[26]  A. Gefen,et al.  Internal mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of a residual limb of a trans-tibial amputee. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Du Zhijiang,et al.  A Novel Finite Element Method based Biomechanical Model for HIT-Robot Assisted Orthopedic Surgery System , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  P. Kolari.  A model approach for calculating the net capillary filtration rate during venous occlusion. , 1993, Clinical physiology.

[29]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  B C Khoo,et al.  The dynamics of a non-equilibrium bubble near bio-materials , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Yi Liu,et al.  Elastography Method for Reconstruction of Nonlinear Breast Tissue Properties , 2009, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[32]  H. Zahouani,et al.  In vivo characterization of viscoelastic properties of human skin using dynamic micro-indentation , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  A. W. Schopper,et al.  Analysis of effects of friction on the deformation behavior of soft tissues in unconfined compression tests. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Serdar Aritan,et al.  A mechanical model representation of the in vivo creep behaviour of muscular bulk tissue. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  S. Levinson,et al.  Sonoelastic determination of human skeletal muscle elasticity. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  M. Kawai,et al.  Quantification of hardness, elasticity and viscosity of the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis using a novel sensing device (Vesmeter): a proposal for a new outcome measurement procedure. , 2008, Rheumatology.

[37]  S.L. Cox,et al.  An Anatomically Based Finite Element Model of the Lower Limbs in the Seated Posture , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  A Gefen,et al.  Mechanical compression-induced pressure sores in rat hindlimb: muscle stiffness, histology, and computational models. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[39]  W. Hayes,et al.  A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  A. W. Schopper,et al.  Nonlinear and viscoelastic characteristics of skin under compression: experiment and analysis. , 2003, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[41]  Abbas Samani,et al.  A method to measure the hyperelastic parameters of ex vivo breast tissue samples. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Michael Burcher,et al.  A novel ultrasound indentation system for measuring biomechanical properties of in vivo soft tissue. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[43]  G Josse,et al.  A nonlinear elastic behavior to identify the mechanical parameters of human skin in vivo , 2008, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[44]  Ren G Dong,et al.  Simultaneous determination of the nonlinear‐elastic properties of skin and subcutaneous tissue in unconfined compression tests , 2007, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[45]  F Patat,et al.  Sex‐ and site‐dependent variations in the thickness and mechanical properties of human skin in vivo , 2000, International journal of cosmetic science.

[46]  Cwj Cees Oomens,et al.  The relative contributions of different skin layers to the mechanical behavior of human skin in vivo using suction experiments. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[47]  A Gefen,et al.  Patient-specific analyses of deep tissue loads post transtibial amputation in residual limbs of multiple prosthetic users. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  Influence of hydration and experimental length scale on the mechanical response of human skin in vivo, using optical coherence tomography , 2004, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[49]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo , 2004, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[50]  A. Maillet,et al.  Characterisation of gravity‐induced facial skin oedema using biophysical measurement techniques , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[51]  Jukka S Jurvelin,et al.  Feasibility of the use of a novel soft tissue stiffness meter , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[52]  A. Le Bot,et al.  Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects , 2009, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[53]  C. G. Lyons,et al.  A validated model of passive muscle in compression. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  J. Lagarde,et al.  In vivo model of the mechanical properties of the human skin under suction , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[55]  Karl Grosh,et al.  A rheological network model for the continuum anisotropic and viscoelastic behavior of soft tissue , 2004, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[56]  Yong-Ping Zheng,et al.  An ultrasound indentation system for biomechanical properties assessment of soft tissues in-vivo , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[57]  Yong-Ping Zheng,et al.  Extraction of effective Young's modulus of skin and subcutaneous tissues from manual indentation data , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[58]  John Z. Wu,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element simulations of the mechanical response of the fingertip to static and dynamic compressions , 2006, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[59]  W. Kraus,et al.  Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.