A DOI-dependent extended energy window method to control balance of scatter and true events

In a conventional PET scanner, coincidence events are limited by the energy window for detection of photoelectric events. In contrast, Compton scatter events occur both in a patient and detector crystals. Scatter events within the patient cause scatter coincidence, but scatter events within crystal have useful information for an activity distribution. The PET scanner with an extended energy window has higher sensitivity but higher scatter fraction than the PET scanner with a default energy window. In this work, we develop a scatter reduction method using a depth-of-interaction (DOI) detector. The DOI detector can make an upper layer act as an absorber of patient scatter for a lower layer. Therefore, crystal scatter with an interacting lower layer has a potential to discriminate patient scatter. Our method has a different energy window for each layer. The energy window of the upper layer is limited to the region of photoelectric events. The energy window of the lower layer is extended to the region of crystal scatter and photoelectric events. We applied our proposal technique for a whole-body PET scanner using GATE simulation. The DOI- PET scanner can provide more true events while keeping a low scatter fraction using this scatter reduction method. Based on simulation results, this method is judged to be promising for obtaining high image quality using DOI information and energy information.

[1]  Hye-Sun An,et al.  Performance measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs using NEMA NU 2-2007 , 2009 .

[2]  T. Mizuta,et al.  Development of a high resolution whole-body DOI PET system , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[3]  Junichi Ohi,et al.  Investigation of a whole-body DOI-PET system , 2007 .

[4]  G. Entine,et al.  Intrinsic Spatial Resolution and Parallax Correction Using Depth-Encoding PET Detector Modules Based on Position-Sensitive APD Readout , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  H. Murayama,et al.  Energy spectra analysis of the four-layer DOI detector for the brain PET scanner: jPET-D4 , 2006 .

[6]  S. Cherry,et al.  Observations regarding scatter fraction and NEC measurements for small animal PET , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  Keishi Kitamura,et al.  Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  The ClearPET™ project: development of a 2nd generation high-performance small animal PET scanner , 2005 .

[9]  J. Seidel,et al.  Resolution uniformity and sensitivity of the NIH ATLAS small animal PET scanner: comparison to simulated LSO scanners without depth-of-interaction capability , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[10]  W. Heiss,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[11]  H. Murayama,et al.  A depth encoding in multicrystal detector for PET , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  T. Lewellen,et al.  Design of a depth of interaction (DOI) PET detector module , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  G Muehllehner,et al.  Positron camera with extended counting rate capability. , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.