Tracking the Development of Automaticity in Memory Search with Human Electrophysiology

Shiffrin and Schneider (1977) demonstrated that highly efficient memoryand visual-search performance could be achieved through consistent item-to-response mapping (CM) training. It is theorized that subjects shifted from relying on working memory to learned item-response associations in long-term memory (Logan, 1988). The theory was tested and explored mostly through behavioral experiments and computational modeling. In a recent series of articles involving visual search (e.g. Woodman et al, 2013; Carlisle et al. 2011), Woodman and colleagues found that the contralateral-delay activity (CDA) of human event-related potentials is related to the maintenance of information in visual working memory and that the magnitude of the CDA decreases when target information is stored in long-term memory. We employed the CDA and other neural measures to study the nature of memory retrieval in CM memory search tasks. We observed a significant reduction in the magnitude of the CDA in CM training compared to a control condition in which item-response mappings varied from trial to trial (VM). The results provided converging evidence supporting the classic theoretical interpretation of the bases for CM and VM memory search. The results also raised interesting questions concerning the detailed interpretation of CDA.

[1]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  High stakes trigger the use of multiple memories to enhance the control of attention. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Familiarity and categorization processes in memory search , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Rui Cao,et al.  Item frequency in probe-recognition memory search: Converging evidence for a role of item-response learning , 2018, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[5]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention? , 2013, Journal of vision.

[7]  Edward Awh,et al.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[9]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[10]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[11]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[13]  Keisuke Fukuda,et al.  Distinct neural mechanisms for spatially lateralized and spatially global visual working memory representations. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[15]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.