Influence of two- and three-dimensional simulations on bubble behavior in gas–solid fluidized beds with and without immersed horizontal tubes

Abstract In this work two- and three-dimensional simulations were performed using Eulerian two-fluid model for bubbling gas–solid fluidized beds with and without immersed horizontal tubes. Results of bubble properties such as aspect ratio, diameter and rise velocity as well as bed expansion were compared with experimental data obtained from pseudo-two-dimensional fluidized bed. The results showed some differences of bubble behavior between two- and three-dimensional simulations especially for beds without immersed tubes. It was found that bubble properties predicted using three-dimensional (3D) simulations were in better agreement with the experimental measurements. However, 3D simulations were computationally expensive and prohibitive for parametric studies. In a bubbling regime, two-dimensional (2D) simulations were also in reasonable agreement with the experimental as well as 3D simulation results. However, at higher superficial velocities and higher bed heights the predicted bubble properties largely deviated from experimental measurements. It was found that for a pseudo-2D bed the influence of the front and back wall became more significant as the bubble size increased. Therefore the validity of 2D simulations at higher superficial velocities where the bed approaches a slugging regime should be treated with great caution. For beds with immersed dense tube banks, both 2D and 3D simulations predicted similar bubble behavior. The shape, size and rise velocity of bubbles were controlled by the tube bank geometry and were found to be nearly independent of the used domain.

[1]  Prabhu R. Nott,et al.  Frictional–collisional equations of motion for participate flows and their application to chutes , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Bo G Leckner,et al.  Two- or three-dimensional simulations of turbulent gas–solid flows applied to fluidization , 2001 .

[3]  David G. Schaeffer,et al.  Instability in the evolution equations describing incompressible granular flow , 1987 .

[4]  Francine Battaglia,et al.  Effects of using two- versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds: Part I, hydrodynamics , 2008 .

[5]  D. Geldart.  Expansion of Gas Fluidized Beds , 2004 .

[6]  S. Simons,et al.  Experimental methods in fluidization research , 1994 .

[7]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Practical validation of the two-fluid model applied to dense gas-solid flows in fluidized beds , 2007 .

[8]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Expansion of a freely bubbling fluidized bed , 1991 .

[9]  J. Jenkins,et al.  A theory for the rapid flow of identical, smooth, nearly elastic, spherical particles , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Teklay Weldeabzgi Asegehegn,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Bubbling Gas–Solid Fluidized Beds with Dense Immersed Tube Bundles , 2011 .

[11]  F. Taghipour,et al.  Experimental and computational study of gas¿solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[12]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Critical comparison of hydrodynamic models for gas-solid fluidized beds - Part II: freely bubbling gas-solid fluidized beds , 2005 .

[13]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Dense Gas-Solid Fluidized Beds: A Multiscale Modeling Strategy , 2008 .

[14]  Hsiaotao Bi,et al.  Reduction of electrostatic charges in gas–solid fluidized beds , 2002 .

[15]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  An equation of state for dense rigid sphere gases , 1986 .

[16]  De-Pan Shi,et al.  A fundamental CFD study of the gas–solid flow field in fluidized bed polymerization reactors , 2011 .

[17]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Rise velocity of single circular-cap bubbles in two-dimensional beds of powders and liquids , 2000 .

[18]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Comparative analysis of CFD models of dense gas–solid systems , 2001 .

[19]  Ulrich Renz,et al.  Verification of Eulerian simulation of spontaneous bubble formation in a fluidized bed , 1998 .

[20]  T. G. Cowling,et al.  The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases , 1939 .

[21]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Validation of the Eulerian simulated dynamic behaviour of gas-solid fluidised beds , 1999 .

[22]  Paola Lettieri,et al.  2D and 3D CFD Simulations of Bubbling Fluidized Beds Using Eulerian-Eulerian Models , 2003 .

[23]  D. Gidaspow,et al.  A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow , 1990 .

[24]  A. Kantzas,et al.  CFD Modeling and Validation of Bubble Properties for a Bubbling Fluidized Bed , 2005 .

[25]  John R. Grace,et al.  Study of wall boundary condition in numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized beds , 2010 .

[26]  D. Gidaspow.  Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions , 1994 .

[27]  M. Syamlal,et al.  MFIX documentation theory guide , 1993 .

[28]  Teklay Weldeabzgi Asegehegn,et al.  Investigation of bubble behavior in fluidized beds with and without immersed horizontal tubes using a digital image analysis technique , 2011 .

[29]  M. Daous,et al.  Bed expansion and average bubble rise velocity in a gas-solid fluidized bed , 1996 .

[30]  van den Cm Bleek,et al.  Eulerian simulations of bubbling behaviour in gas-solid fluidised beds , 1998 .

[31]  S. Pannala,et al.  Multifluid Eulerian modeling of dense gas–solids fluidized bed hydrodynamics: Influence of the dissipation parameters , 2008 .

[32]  Ulrich Renz,et al.  Eulerian simulation of bubble formation at a jet in a two-dimensional fluidized bed , 1997 .

[33]  R. Jackson,et al.  Gas‐particle flow in a vertical pipe with particle‐particle interactions , 1989 .

[34]  Francine Battaglia,et al.  Effects of using two- versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds: Part II, budget analysis , 2008 .

[35]  R. Jackson,et al.  Frictional–collisional constitutive relations for granular materials, with application to plane shearing , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  Teklay Weldeabzgi Asegehegn,et al.  Numerical simulation and experimental validation of bubble behavior in 2D gas–solid fluidized beds with immersed horizontal tubes , 2011 .

[37]  Jianmin Ding,et al.  Three-dimensional kinetic theory modeling of hydrodynamics and erosion in fluidized beds , 1992 .

[38]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.