Remarks about postinfarction prognosis in light of the experience with the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell' Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) trials.

The contribution of large-scale trials to the impressive therapeutic advances that have occurred over the past 10 years in the area of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is universally acknowledged. A less frequently considered aspect of trials on AMI is their capacity of acting as “new-generation” data bases providing real-time updated prognostic information. This aspect seems to apply specifically to the case of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell' Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) trials.1 2 3 Indeed, their open design, the absence of age limits in the enrollment criteria, and the countrywide coverage of the recruitment appear to be crucial for close mimicking of routine conditions of care. Moreover, the very large number of patients enrolled (>40 000 in three trials) and the prospective collection of clinical and laboratory data of prognostic relevance provide a privileged perspective for evaluation of postinfarction prognosis. Last, but not least, the observed low frequency of coronary revascularization procedures (≈8%) limits the workup bias. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to propose a view of postinfarction prognosis in the light of the experience of the GISSI trials. Accordingly, emphasis is placed on questions that have been specifically addressed by GISSI trial investigators. The establishment of a new therapeutic standard for AMI that is centered on thrombolytics and aspirin in addition to intravenous β-blockers has led to a substantial reduction in early mortality after the acute coronary event. Although doubts have been cast as to whether the survival benefit documented in large-scale trials can actually be transferred to routine clinical practice, in view of the underutilization of recommended treatments in some countries, including the United States and Canada,4 5 6 7 it is worth noting that a >70% use of thrombolytic drugs has been reported in the multinational ISIS-4 and Italian GISSI-3 trials. …

[1]  R. Califf,et al.  Risk Stratification after Myocardial Infarction , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  The prognostic value of predischarge quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements and the effects of early lisinopril treatment on left ventricular structure and function after acute myocardial infarction in the GISSI-3 Trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Inf , 1996, European heart journal.

[3]  A. Maggioni,et al.  Prognostic significance of heart rate variability in post-myocardial infarction patients in the fibrinolytic era. The GISSI-2 results. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell' Infarto Miocardico. , 1996, Circulation.

[4]  Nell'Infarto Miocardico Six-month effects of early treatment with lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together withdrawn six weeks atter acute myocardial infarction: The GISSI-3 trial , 1996 .

[5]  M. Flather,et al.  ACE inhibitor use in patients with myocardial infarction. Summary of evidence from clinical trials. , 1995, Circulation.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  Frequency, significance, and cost of recurrent ischemia after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  D. Brand,et al.  Cardiologists' practices compared with practice guidelines: use of beta-blockade after acute myocardial infarction. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Prognostic significance of nonfatal reinfarction during 3-year follow-up: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II clinical trial. The TIMI Investigators. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  G. Minardi,et al.  Stress echocardiographic results predict risk of reinfarction early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: large-scale multicenter study. Echo Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  A. Maggioni,et al.  Prognostic significance of maximal exercise testing after myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents: the GISSI-2 data-base , 1995, The Lancet.

[11]  Raymond C. Schneider,et al.  ISIS-4: A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58 050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction , 1995, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Cavalli,et al.  High- and Low-Risk Groups: Early and Late Prognostic Stratification , 1994, Journal of cardiovascular risk.

[13]  R. M. Rubison,et al.  Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. , 1994, Circulation.

[14]  V. Fuster,et al.  Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture. Mechanisms leading to myocardial infarction: insights from studies of vascular biology. , 1994, Circulation.

[15]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Predictors of nonfatal reinfarction in survivors of myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2) Data Base. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Spontaneous Delayed Recovery of Perfusion and Contraction After the First 5 Weeks After Anterior Infarction: Evidence for the Presence of Hibernating Myocardium in the Infarcted Area , 1994, Circulation.

[17]  J. Stengård,et al.  Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase as predictors of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus before clinical onset of disease , 1994, The Lancet.

[18]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico. GISSI-3: effects of lisiriopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction , 1994, The Lancet.

[19]  A. Maggioni,et al.  Frequency of predischarge ventricular arrhythmias in postmyocardial infarction patients depends on residual left ventricular pump performance and is independent of the occurrence of acute reperfusion. The GISSI-2 Investigators. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  J. Buring,et al.  The benefits of aspirin in acute myocardial infarction. Still a well-kept secret in the United States. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  A. Maseri,et al.  Age-Related Increase in Mortality among Patients with First Myocardial Infarctions Treated with Thrombolysis , 1993 .

[22]  U. Goldbourt,et al.  Predictors and long-term prognostic significance of recurrent infarction in the year after a first myocardial infarction , 1993 .

[23]  E. Negri,et al.  Determinants of 6‐Month Mortality in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction After Thrombolysis Results of the GISSI‐2 Data Base , 1993, Circulation.

[24]  M. Galli,et al.  Prognostic significance of early ischemia after acute myocardial infarction in low-risk patients. IRES (Ischemia Residua) Study Group. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  G. Lamas,et al.  A comparison of management patterns after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. The SAVE investigators. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Frequency domain measures of heart period variability to assess risk late after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Ventricular Arrhythmias After Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Fibrinolytic Era GISSI‐2 Results , 1993, Circulation.

[28]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  A. Camm,et al.  Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Factors associated with recurrent myocardial infarction within one year after acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, American heart journal.

[31]  J. Owens,et al.  Features of "near-death experience" in relation to whether or not patients were near death , 1990, The Lancet.

[32]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Routine medical management of acute myocardial infarction. Lessons from overviews of recent randomized controlled trials. , 1990, Circulation.

[33]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico. MEDICAL SCIENCE GISSI-2: A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12 490 patients with acute myocardial infarction , 1990, The Lancet.

[34]  A. Skene,et al.  Effects of alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: 6-month results from the ASSET study , 1990, The Lancet.

[35]  P. Marino,et al.  Effect of streptokinase on left ventricular modeling and function after myocardial infarction: the GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico) Trial. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  R. Califf,et al.  From myocardial salvage to patient salvage in acute myocardial infarction: the role of reperfusion therapy. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  E. Gilpin,et al.  A decision scheme for coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. , 1989, Circulation.

[38]  A. Folsom,et al.  Improvement in long-term survival among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1980. The Minnesota Heart Survey. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  J. Miller,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[40]  Y. Ohtsuki,et al.  ISOLATION OF HTLV-I FROM CEREBROSPINAL FLUID OF A PATIENT WITH MYELOPATHY , 1986, The Lancet.

[41]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico. EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYTIC TREATMENT IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1986, The Lancet.

[42]  S. Johansson,et al.  Declining trend in mortality after myocardial infarction. , 1984, British heart journal.