The commercial vehicle industry faces new challenges, such as the upcoming carbon-dioxide (CO2) targets in Europe and a tightened regulatory program in the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). In addition, increasing costs and globally rising transport volumes are increasing the pressure on vehicle manufacturers to find the optimum fuel and powertrain setup for heavy-duty (HD) vehicles. This paper presents a new approach to optimizing HD truck powertrains with diesel, natural-gas, diesel-electric and natural-gas-electric engines. The contradiction between maximizing the transport efficiency and minimizing the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) leads to a method of solving multi-objective problems (MOPs) using evolutionary algorithms (EAs). The use of EAs to solve MOPs is mainly motivated by the population-based method of EAs, which allows several elements of the Pareto optimal set to be generated in a single run. The basic algorithm adopted for this purpose is K. Deb's NSGA-II. In order to optimize the vehicle drivetrain, not only are the sizes of the combustion engine, electric motor and the battery allowed to vary, but different component models are also considered, including different gearboxes, operating strategies and battery cell types. Several constraints are applied in the algorithm, such as climbing ability, minimum engine power, and battery charge rates. The designed vehicles are based on real engine maps and are simulated with real-life measured driving cycles, including autobahn and federal road elements. The results were validated with the simulation software AVL Cruise and Dyna4. The objective of the developed methodology is to present the best possible solution with respect to transport efficiency and TCO.
[1]
Stefan Hausberger,et al.
The Development of a Simulation Tool for Monitoring Heavy-Duty Vehicle CO 2 Emissions and Fuel Consumption in Europe
,
2013
.
[2]
Tony Sandberg,et al.
Heavy Truck Modeling for Fuel Consumption Simulations and Measurements
,
2001
.
[3]
B. Nykvist,et al.
Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles
,
2015
.
[4]
N. Stander,et al.
A Study on the Convergence of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms
,
2009
.
[5]
Hengbing Zhao,et al.
Analysis of Class 8 truck technologies for their fuel savings and economics
,
2013
.
[6]
Lin Zhu,et al.
Analysis of Class 8 hybrid-electric truck technologies using diesel, LNG, electricity, and hydrogen, as the fuel for various applications
,
2013,
2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27).
[7]
Michael Fries,et al.
Virtual Truck – A method for customer oriented commercial vehicle simulation
,
2016
.
[8]
M. Lienkamp,et al.
Multi-objective optimization of a long-haul truck hybrid operational strategy and a predictive powertrain control system
,
2017,
2017 Twelfth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER).
[9]
Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
,
2002,
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..