An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance

Abstract The open innovation (OI) paradigm describes how firms innovate by interacting with other organizations. Several authors found that specific OI strategies have a positive effect on economic and industrial innovation performance. Nevertheless, over-search and over-collaboration phenomena might reduce the OI marginal returns when a firm resorts to additional external innovation partners. This article hypothesizes that the variety of external innovation channels (search breadth) used by a firm, the extent to which a firm draws deeply from them (search depth) and the extent to which a firm collaborates through different external channels (coupled OI) are curvilinearly related with innovation performance. The empirical models are estimated using 84,919 firms from Eurostat's Community Innovation Survey, which was conducted in 2008 across European countries. The results suggest that search breadth is curvilinearly related with all the measures of innovation performance, whereas search depth is not subject to diminishing marginal returns in most cases. Furthermore, this article shows that coupled OI is curvilinearly related with the development and commercialization of radically new products. The findings of this study make several contributions both in a practical perspective, showing how managers can put into practice different OI strategies to influence innovation performance, and in a theoretical perspective, suggesting a number of recommendations for future research.

[1]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Jin Chen,et al.  The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms , 2011 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[4]  Xavier Vence,et al.  Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises , 2012 .

[5]  Ellen Enkel,et al.  Understanding a firm's choice for openness: strategy as determinant , 2014, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[6]  W. Sofka,et al.  Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries , 2009 .

[7]  M. Knudsen.  The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success , 2007 .

[8]  C. Köhler,et al.  Selective search, sectoral patterns, and the impact on product innovation performance , 2012 .

[9]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[10]  Xiaobo Xu,et al.  Research on open innovation performance: a review , 2015, Information Technology and Management.

[11]  Thomas P. Vartanian,et al.  Secondary Data Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[13]  P. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen,et al.  Orchestrating R&D networks: Absorptive capacity, network stability, and innovation appropriability , 2012 .

[14]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions , 1997 .

[15]  Antonello Cammarano,et al.  Measuring Open Innovation in the Bio‐Pharmaceutical Industry , 2015 .

[16]  Davide Aloini,et al.  Degree of Openness and Performance in the Search for Innovation , 2012 .

[17]  L. Cricelli,et al.  ASSESSING THE OPEN INNOVATION TRENDS BY MEANS OF THE EUROSTAT COMMUNITY INNOVATION SURVEY , 2016 .

[18]  Jun-You Lin.  Effects on diversity of R&D sources and human capital on industrial performance , 2014 .

[19]  Carmen Weigelt,et al.  The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrative capabilities and performance , 2009 .

[20]  R. Narula.  R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .

[21]  Andrea Schenker-Wicki,et al.  Fostering radical innovations with open innovation , 2012 .

[22]  Sandro Montresor,et al.  The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries , 2015 .

[23]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[24]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Determinants of Alliance Portfolio Complexity and Its Effect on Innovative Performance of Companies , 2011 .

[25]  Victor Gilsing,et al.  Persistence of and interrelation between horizontal and vertical technology alliances , 2009 .

[26]  Colin C.J. Cheng,et al.  When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation , 2014 .

[27]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[28]  Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio,et al.  Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry , 2009 .

[29]  Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod,et al.  Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms , 2008 .

[30]  L. Rubalcaba,et al.  Knowledge for innovation in Europe: The role of external knowledge on firms' cooperation strategies , 2013 .

[31]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .

[32]  Desirée Knoppen,et al.  Towards an empirical typology of buyer–supplier relationships based on absorptive capacity , 2013 .

[33]  Anne-Laure Mention,et al.  Co-operation and co-opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: Which influence on innovation novelty? , 2011 .

[34]  Sue Newell,et al.  Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity , 2015 .

[35]  Andreas Mild,et al.  A critical review of empirical research on open innovation adoption , 2012 .

[36]  Bart van Looy,et al.  The Initiation and Evolution of Interfirm Knowledge Transfer in R&D Relationships , 2007 .

[37]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[38]  Kurt Gaubinger,et al.  Open Innovation And Its Effectiveness To Embrace Turbulent Environments , 2011 .

[39]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[40]  Dries Faems,et al.  The impact of continuous and discontinuous alliance strategies on startup innovation performance , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[41]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis , 2011 .

[42]  Hend A. Malhat,et al.  Curved Dual - Band Dielectric Resonator Tag Antenna for RFID Applications , 2011, 2011 28th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC).

[43]  A. Lasagni.  How Can External Relationships Enhance Innovation in SMEs? New Evidence for Europe* , 2012 .

[44]  S. Sedita,et al.  Learning at the boundaries in an "Open Regional Innovation System": A focus on firms' innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry , 2010 .

[45]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing , 2010 .

[46]  Jaider Vega Jurado,et al.  Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry , 2009 .

[47]  Keld Laursen.  User-Producer Interaction as a Driver of Innovation: Costs and Advantages in an Open Innovation Model , 2011 .

[48]  M. Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado,et al.  Do firm’s sector and size influence on the degree of inbound open innovation? , 2012 .

[49]  Robert Huggins,et al.  Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size , 2010 .

[50]  C. Schultz,et al.  The financial structure of innovative SMEs in Germany , 2013 .

[51]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[52]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[53]  M. Wright,et al.  Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective , 2009 .

[54]  Marcus M. Keupp,et al.  Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation , 2009 .

[55]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  The Contribution of In‐house and External Design Activities to Product Market Performance , 2012 .

[56]  Kuang-Peng Hung,et al.  Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Inter-Organizational Knowledge Flows , 2010 .

[57]  M. Wagner.  Sustainability-related innovation and competitiveness-enhancing regulation: a qualitative and quantitative analysis in the context of open innovation , 2011 .

[58]  Wolfgang Sofka,et al.  Specialized Search and Innovation Performance – Evidence Across Europe , 2010 .

[59]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Innovating Business Models with Co-Development Partnerships , 2007 .

[60]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms , 2009 .

[61]  Coping with uncertainty – exploration, exploitation, and collaboration in R&D , 2013 .

[62]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners , 2014 .

[63]  Manfredi Bruccoleri,et al.  The Effect Of Inbound, Outbound And Coupled Innovation On Performance , 2012 .

[64]  N. Foss,et al.  Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions , 2015 .

[65]  R. Evangelista,et al.  Innovation and economic performance in services. A firm level analysis , 2006 .

[66]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  The benefits of R&D and breadth in innovation strategies: a comparison of Finnish service and manufacturing firms , 2012 .

[67]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  Investing in Networking Competences or Establishing in Hot Spots?: The Innovation Dilemna , 2009 .

[68]  B. Ebersberger,et al.  Product Innovation and the Complementarities of External Interfaces , 2011 .

[69]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[70]  Federico Etro,et al.  Endogenous Market Structures and Innovation by Leaders: An Empirical Test , 2011 .

[71]  Gaurav Bhalla.  Collaboration and Co-creation: New Platforms for Marketing and Innovation , 2010 .

[72]  Andreas Mild,et al.  Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D , 2011 .

[73]  B. Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm , 2010 .

[74]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany , 2007 .

[75]  Ming-Je Tang,et al.  Vertical integration and innovative performance: The effects of external knowledge sourcing modes , 2010 .

[76]  Liisa-Maija Sainio,et al.  Appropriability Regime for Radical and Incremental Innovations , 2008 .

[77]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  R&D Collaborations and Product Innovation , 2010 .

[78]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[79]  J. Lind,et al.  With or Without U? The Appropriate Test for a U-Shaped Relationship , 2007 .

[80]  S. Negassi,et al.  R&D co-operation and innovation a microeconometric study on French firms , 2004 .

[81]  Marco Greco,et al.  Open innovation actions and innovation performance , 2015 .

[82]  Manuel Sánchez-Pérez,et al.  Exploitation- and exploration-based innovations: The role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors , 2011 .

[83]  D. Czarnitzki,et al.  Sources of Spillovers for Imitation and Innovation , 2013 .

[84]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Open, Semi-Open and Closed Innovators: Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness , 2010 .

[85]  H. Ernst,et al.  Intermediary Services in the Markets for Technology: Organizational Antecedents and Performance Consequences , 2008 .

[86]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Technology In-Sourcing and the Creation of Pioneering Technologies , 2008 .

[87]  Peter Teirlinck,et al.  Research collaboration and R&D outsourcing: Different R&D personnel requirements in SMEs , 2013 .

[88]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[89]  U. Lichtenthaler.  The Collaboration of Innovation Intermediaries and Manufacturing Firms in the Markets for Technology , 2013 .

[90]  Cynthia A. Lengnick-Hall,et al.  Innovation and Competitive Advantage: What We Know and What We Need to Learn , 1992 .

[91]  Shyh-Hwang Lee,et al.  Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[92]  Kris Aerts,et al.  Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany , 2008 .

[93]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Surfing the New Wave of Open Innovation Research , 2014 .

[94]  Mara Nikolaidou,et al.  From Open Source to Open Innovation practices: A case in the Greek context in light of the debt crisis , 2013 .

[95]  M. O. Criado,et al.  Do firm's sector and size influence on the degree of inbound open innovation? , 2012 .

[96]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Identifying Technology Commercialization Opportunities: The Importance of Integrating Product Development Knowledge , 2012 .

[97]  Jina Kang,et al.  HOW DO FIRMS SOURCE EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE FOR INNOVATION? ANALYSING EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE SOURCING METHODS , 2009 .