HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects

Twenty years ago Guest (1987) published his normative framework describing the essence of HRM. He presented HRM as a new approach to personnel management, emphasizing its strategic contribution, its closer alignment to business, the involvement of line management, and focusing on HRM outcomes like commitment, flexibility and quality. The achievement of these human resource outcomes was, in turn, expected to contribute to a range of positive organizational outcomes, including high job performance, low turnover, low absence and high cost-effectiveness through the full utilization of employees, now relabelled as human resources. Put this way, it is not difficult to understand the wide appeal that the notion of HRM had (and still has) to academics and practitioners alike. It led to the renaming of chairs/departments within universities and to changed job titles in the business community. The attractiveness of the concept of HRM increased considerably when Huselid, in 1995, published a ground-breaking paper in the Academy of Management Journal in which he demonstrated a correlation between the degree of sophistication of HR-systems and the market value per employee among a range of publicly quoted companies in the USA. The paper generated admiration, criticism and an abundance of 'me too' research, trying to replicate the proclaimed relationship between HRM and Performance (Delery and Doty, 1996; Guthrie, 2001; Koch and McGrath, 1996; Wright et al., 2003). Since then many academics on both sides of the Atlantic have become active in this field, with a special focus on the relationship between HRM and Performance. Within this rapidly expanding field of study, the HRM–Performance relationship has been approached from a variety of perspectives rooted in organizational behaviour, sociology, economics, industrial relations and organizational psychology, with a particular emphasis placed on the impact of various combinations of human resource practices on a range of performance outcomes at the individual and organizational level of analysis.

[1]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[2]  Glenn M. McEvoy,et al.  Managing Human Assets , 1984 .

[3]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[4]  D. Guest.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS[1] , 1987 .

[5]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[6]  John Storey,et al.  Human Resource Management: A Critical Text , 1994 .

[7]  P. Osterman.  How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[8]  J. Moody,et al.  Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance , 1994 .

[9]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Work motivation: New directions in theory and research. , 1994 .

[10]  Jason Lowther,et al.  Developments in the Management of Human Resources , 1994 .

[11]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Fit, failure, and the hall of fame : how companies succeed or fail , 1994 .

[12]  K. Legge.  Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities , 1995 .

[13]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[14]  L. Dyer,et al.  Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go? , 1995 .

[15]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[16]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[17]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[18]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  IMPROVING LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DO MATTER , 1996 .

[19]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[20]  D. Guest.  Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda , 1997 .

[21]  Keith Leslie Whitfield,et al.  Unions, Flexibility, Team Working and Financial Performance , 1997 .

[22]  J. Paauwe,et al.  Strategic human resource management and performance: introduction , 1997 .

[23]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  HR as a Source of Shareholder Value: Research and Recommendations , 1997 .

[24]  T. Keenoy.  HRMism and the Languages of Re-presentation , 1997 .

[25]  R. Richardson,et al.  Evaluating performance-related pay for managers in the National Health Service , 1997 .

[26]  Christopher Mabey,et al.  Experiencing Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[27]  J. Guarino.  Book Review Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. By Denise M. Rousseau. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California , 1998 .

[28]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[29]  P. Wright,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in strategic human resource management: Problems, prospects and performance information markets , 1998 .

[30]  David Guest,et al.  Human resource management - the workers' verdict , 1999 .

[31]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[32]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates? , 2000 .

[33]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  COMMENT ON “MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: HOW MUCH ERROR IS THERE AND HOW DOES IT INFLUENCE EFFECTSIZE ESTIMATES?” by GERHART, WRIGHT, MC MAHAN, AND SNELL , 2000 .

[34]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Theoretical and Empirical Challenges in Studying: The HR Practice - Firm Performance Relationship , 2000 .

[35]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. , 2000 .

[36]  John Godard,et al.  High Performance and the Transformation of Work? The Implications of Alternative Work Practices for the Experience and Outcomes of Work , 2001 .

[37]  J. Guthrie.  High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[38]  Ray Richardson,et al.  Editorial introduction: HRM and performance: confronting theory and reality , 2001 .

[39]  D. Guest.  Human Resource Management, Corporate Performance and Employee Wellbeing: Building the Worker into HRM , 2002 .

[40]  Rosemary L. Batt,et al.  MANAGING CUSTOMER SERVICES: HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, QUIT RATES, AND SALES GROWTH , 2002 .

[41]  P. Wright,et al.  Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research , 2002 .

[42]  Neil Conway,et al.  Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK , 2003 .

[43]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units , 2003 .

[44]  Neil Conway,et al.  Using sequential tree analysis to search for ‘bundles’ of HR practices , 2004 .

[45]  R. Peccei.  Human Resource Management And The Search For The Happy Workplace , 2004 .

[46]  J. Godard.  A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm , 2004 .

[47]  Toby D. Wall,et al.  The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science , 2005 .

[48]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[49]  Marc van Veldhoven,et al.  Financial performance and the long-term link with HR practices, work climate and job stress , 2005 .

[50]  J. Paauwe,et al.  HRM and performance: What's next? , 2005 .

[51]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[52]  John J. Haggerty,et al.  Missing Variables in Theories of Strategic Human Resource Management: Time, Cause, and Individuals , 2005 .

[53]  A. Keegan,et al.  The Lack of Impact of Dissensus Inspired Analysis on Developments in the Field of Human Resource Management , 2006 .

[54]  Anthony Hesketh,et al.  Beyond Measuring the Human Resources Management-Organizational Performance Link: Applying Critical Realist Meta-Theory , 2006 .

[55]  Stephen Procter.  HRM and performance: Achieving long term viability , 2006 .

[56]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here? , 2006 .

[57]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[58]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Strategic HRM and Organizational Behavior: Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2006 .

[59]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, The , 2007 .

[60]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The Human Resource ‒ Firm Performance Relationship: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges , 2008 .

[61]  Michael Beckmann,et al.  Complementarities between workplace organisation and human resource management: evidence from Swiss firm-level panel data , 2010 .

[62]  Rémi Jardat,et al.  Psychological Contracts in Organizations Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements , 2011 .