The Onset Time of the Ownership Sensation in the Moving Rubber Hand Illusion

The rubber hand illusion (RHI) is a perceptual illusion whereby a model hand is perceived as part of one’s own body. This illusion has been extensively studied, but little is known about the temporal evolution of this perceptual phenomenon, i.e., how long it takes until participants start to experience ownership over the model hand. In the present study, we investigated a version of the rubber hand experiment based on finger movements and measured the average onset time in active and passive movement conditions. This comparison enabled us to further explore the possible role of intentions and motor control processes that are only present in the active movement condition. The results from a large group of healthy participants (n = 117) showed that the illusion of ownership took approximately 23 s to emerge (active: 22.8; passive: 23.2). The 90th percentile occurs in both conditions within approximately 50 s (active: 50; passive: 50.6); therefore, most participants experience the illusion within the first minute. We found indirect evidence of a facilitatory effect of active movements compared to passive movements, and we discuss these results in the context of our current understanding of the processes underlying the moving RHI.

[1]  P. Petrovic,et al.  When Passive Feels Active - Delusion-Proneness Alters Self-Recognition in the Moving Rubber Hand Illusion , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Two Eyes for an Eye: The Neuroscience of Force Escalation , 2003, Science.

[3]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[5]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  The relationship between human agency and embodiment , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis , 2009, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[8]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Virtual Hand Illusion Induced by Visuomotor Correlations , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Giovanni Gentile,et al.  The Invisible Hand Illusion: Multisensory Integration Leads to the Embodiment of a Discrete Volume of Empty Space , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Regine Zopf,et al.  Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Keehoon Kim,et al.  Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  B. Hommel,et al.  The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Christopher Caudwell This my hand , 1936 .

[16]  Catherine Preston,et al.  New reflections on agency and body ownership: The moving rubber hand illusion in the mirror , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  Jeffrey G. Ojemann,et al.  Ownership of an artificial limb induced by electrical brain stimulation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Jeremy D. Thorne,et al.  Interplay of Agency and Ownership: The Intentional Binding and Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm Combined , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  Albert Jin Chung,et al.  Perception of Body Ownership Is Driven by Bayesian Sensory Inference , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  The spatial distance rule in the moving and classical rubber hand illusions , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[22]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  When Right Feels Left: Referral of Touch and Ownership between the Hands , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: when a robotic hand becomes one’s own , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[24]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Towards a Digital Body: The Virtual Arm Illusion , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[25]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Virtual Out-of-Body Experience Reduces Fear of Death , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  Allan M. Lees The invisible hand , 2008, Nature.

[27]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Behavioural Brain Research , 1999 .

[28]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  P. Garety,et al.  Measuring delusional ideation: the 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI). , 2004, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[30]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[31]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Inducing Illusory Ownership of a Virtual Body , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[32]  C. Moore,et al.  Movement and the Rubber Hand Illusion , 2009, Perception.

[33]  D. Lloyd Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach , 2008, Cognition.

[35]  Jeremy D. Thorne,et al.  Embodied neurofeedback with an anthropomorphic robotic hand , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[36]  B. Hommel,et al.  The virtual-hand illusion: effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[37]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Violating body movement semantics: Neural signatures of self-generated and external-generated errors , 2016, NeuroImage.

[38]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[40]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Extending Body Space in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Very Long Arm Illusion , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  M. Slater,et al.  The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  Mel Slater,et al.  Is my hand connected to my body? The impact of body continuity and arm alignment on the virtual hand illusion , 2011, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[43]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[44]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  R B Welch,et al.  An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Peter Brugger,et al.  The robot hand illusion: Inducing proprioceptive drift through visuo-motor congruency , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[51]  M. Tsakiris My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.