Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol

The PET compound 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) has been developed and tested as an agent for the imaging of estrogen receptor (ER) expression in vivo. 18F-FES uptake has been shown to correlate with ER expression assayed in vitro by radioligand binding; however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) rather than radioligand binding is used most often to measure ER expression in clinical practice. We therefore compared 18F-FES uptake with ER expression assayed in vitro by IHC with both qualitative and semiquantitative measures. Methods: Seventeen patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer were studied with dynamic 18F-FES PET; cancer tissue samples, collected close to the time of imaging, were assayed for ER expression by IHC. For each tumor, partial-volume-corrected measures of 18F-FES uptake were compared with ER expression measured by 3 different ER scoring methods: qualitative scoring (0–3+), the Allred score (0–10), and a computerized IHC index. Results: There was excellent agreement (r = 0.99) between observers using IHC as well as the different methods of measuring ER content (P < 0.001). ER-negative tumors had 18F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values of less than 1.0, whereas ER-positive tumors had values above 1.1. Correlation coefficients for the different measures of ER content and the different measures of 18F-FES uptake ranged from 0.57 to 0.73, with the best correlation being between the computerized IHC index and 18F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values. Conclusion: Our results showed good agreement between 18F-FES PET and ER expression measured by IHC. 18F-FES imaging may be a useful tool for aiding in the assessment of ER status, especially in patients with multiple tumors or for tumors that are difficult to biopsy.

[1]  M. Welch,et al.  Preparation of four fluorine- 18-labeled estrogens and their selective uptakes in target tissues of immature rats. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  M. Duffy,et al.  Objective measurement of breast cancer oestrogen receptor status through digital image analysis. , 2003, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  K. Hirakawa,et al.  Immunohistochemical assessment for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer: Analysis for a cut-off point as the predictor for endocrine therapy , 2004, Breast cancer.

[4]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Prognostic usefulness of estrogen receptor immunocytochemical assays for human breast cancer. , 1986, Cancer research.

[5]  J E Mortimer,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  T K Lewellen,et al.  Carbon-11-thymidine and FDG to measure therapy response. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  F. Spyratos,et al.  Comparison of Enzyme Immunoassay and Immunohistochemical Measurements of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer Patients , 2001, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[8]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Mintun,et al.  Breast cancer: PET imaging of estrogen receptors. , 1988, Radiology.

[10]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Steroid hormone receptors as prognostic indicators in primary breast cancer. , 1986, Breast cancer research and treatment.

[12]  L. Andrac,et al.  Multiparametric study (SAMBA 200) of estrogen receptor immunocytochemical assay in 400 human breast carcinomas: analysis of estrogen receptor distribution heterogeneity in tissues and correlations with dextran coated charcoal assays and morphological data. , 1988, Cancer research.

[13]  David A. Mankoff,et al.  Application of Photoshop-based Image Analysis to Quantification of Hormone Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer , 1997, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[14]  Allen M. Gown,et al.  Complete Chromogen Separation and Analysis in Double Immunohistochemical Stains Using Photoshop-based Image Analysis , 1999, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[15]  D. Allred,et al.  Immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptors in human breast carcinomas. Evaluation of 130 cases and review of the literature regarding concordance with biochemical assay and clinical relevance. , 1990, Archives of surgery.

[16]  M. Welch,et al.  Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[17]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Validation of PET-acquired input functions for cardiac studies. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  M. Welch,et al.  Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Kurosumi Significance of immunohistochemical assessment of steroid hormone receptor status for breast cancer patients , 2003, Breast cancer.

[20]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2006 , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  D. Allred,et al.  Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. , 1998, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[22]  S C Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[23]  W. Hanna,et al.  Comparative evaluation of ER-ICA and enzyme immunoassay for the quantitation of estrogen receptors in breast cancer. , 1989, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  T G Turkington,et al.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Mårten Fernö,et al.  Comparison of Immunohistochemical and Biochemical Assay of Steroid Receptors in Primary Breast Cancer Clinical Associations and Reasons for Discrepancies , 2003, Acta oncologica.

[26]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  C. Geyer,et al.  Solving the dilemma of the immunohistochemical and other methods used for scoring estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor in patients with invasive breast carcinoma , 2005, Cancer.

[28]  E. Szabo,et al.  Immunocytochemical analysis of estrogen receptors as a predictor of prognosis in breast cancer patients: comparison with quantitative biochemical methods. , 1989, Cancer research.

[29]  C. Stearns,et al.  Investigation of the count rate performance of the General Electric Advance positron emission tomograph , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94.

[30]  T. Powles,et al.  Immunocytochemical assay for estrogen receptor: relationship to outcome of therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. , 1986, Cancer research.

[31]  E B Cox,et al.  Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. , 1985, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[32]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[34]  D. Barnes,et al.  Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[35]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Analysis of blood clearance and labeled metabolites for the estrogen receptor tracer [F-18]-16 alpha-fluoroestradiol (FES). , 1997, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[36]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Interactions of 16alpha-[18F]-fluoroestradiol (FES) with sex steroid binding protein (SBP). , 1999, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[37]  Samuel Hellman,et al.  Important advances in oncology , 1991 .

[38]  H. Battifora,et al.  Predictive value of estrogen receptors evaluated by quantitative immunohistochemical analysis in breast cancer. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[39]  K. Pollow,et al.  Comparison of immunocytochemical estrogen receptor assay, estrogen receptor enzyme immunoassay, and radioligand-labeled estrogen receptor assay in human breast cancer and uterine tissue. , 1986, Cancer research.