Research Note - Cost Uncertainty Is Bliss: The Effect of Competition on the Acquisition of Cost Information for Pricing New Products

We examine the optimal acquisition of information about a common uncertain cost factor by two competing firms seeking to price a new product. We show that existing findings regarding the acquisition of demand information or the acquisition of either cost or demand information related to quantity decisions do not extend to this case. For cost information with price competition, the information acquisition strategies are strategic substitutes, even though the price decisions that are based on the information are strategic complements. Competition decreases the expected value of cost information. Moreover, when competition is intense and the cost of information low, identical firms do not acquire the same amount of cost information--even when information is free. Cost uncertainty acts like a "fog" that lessens the destructive effect of price competition when products are close substitutes, and thus increases expected profits. Buyers, on the other hand, are better off when competing firms are informed about cost. Even though the expected value of cost information strictly decreases with competition, the optimal price for industry-specific cost information set by an information vendor increases with competition when the firms' products are sufficiently substitutable.

[1]  Michael Raith A General Model of Information Sharing in Oligopoly , 1993 .

[2]  Anat R. Admati,et al.  Direct and Indirect Sale of Information , 1990 .

[3]  Y. Ho,et al.  Informational properties of the Nash solutions of two stochastic nonzero-sum games , 1974 .

[4]  T. Gruca,et al.  Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice , 1999 .

[5]  Chun-Hao Chang,et al.  Optimal Pricing Strategy in Marketing Research Consulting , 1994 .

[6]  J. Ponssard On the Concept of the Value of Information in Competitive Situations , 1976 .

[7]  D. Sasaki Strategic Information Acquisition , 1997 .

[8]  Hae-shin Hwang Information Acquisition and Relative Efficiency of Competitive, Oligopoly and Monopoly Markets , 1995 .

[9]  Hae-shin Hwang Optimal Information Acquisition for Heterogenous Duopoly Firms , 1993 .

[10]  John D. C. Little,et al.  A Model of Adaptive Control of Promotional Spending , 2011, Oper. Res..

[11]  X. Vives Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and bertrand , 1984 .

[12]  J. Hirshleifer The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity , 1971 .

[13]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities , 1990 .

[14]  Anat R. Admati,et al.  A monopolistic market for information , 1986 .

[15]  X. Vives Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools , 1999 .

[16]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Strategic Factor Market Intelligence: An Application of Information Economics to Strategy Formulation and Competitor Intelligence , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[17]  E. Gal‐Or,et al.  Information Transmission—Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria , 1986 .

[18]  J. Raju,et al.  Market Information and Firm Performance , 2000 .

[19]  W. A. Ericson A Note on the Posterior Mean of a Population Mean , 1969 .

[20]  David A. Malueg,et al.  Duopoly information exchange: The case of unknown slope , 1996 .

[21]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[22]  M. Sarvary,et al.  Marketing Information: A Competitive Analysis , 1997 .

[23]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Optimal Research for Cournot Oligopolists , 1987 .

[24]  Esther Gal-Or The Advantages of Imprecise Information , 1988 .

[25]  Dan Sasaki The value of information in oligopoly with demand uncertainty , 2001 .

[26]  Ganesh Iyer,et al.  Markets for Product Modification Information , 2000 .

[27]  Esther Gal-Or,et al.  First Mover Disadvantages with Private Information , 1987 .