Consumers’ perception toward quality and safety of fishery products, Beijing, China

Abstract Consumers around the world increased consumption of fish and fish products in recent years due to recognition of their nutritional value. Frequent occurrences of food safety scares heightened public awareness causing significant reduction in the consumption of the affected products. Many countries, including China, implemented a traceability system to increase vertical coordination and guarantee safety in fish products. This paper aims to provide information on consumers’ awareness to quality and safety of fish products, purchasing behavior, and willingness to pay (WTP) for safe fish products in Beijing, China, based on a survey of consumers. The results show a shortage of safety knowledge among customers concerning fish products, including processing, storage, and the traceability system. The age of consumers, educational level, the perception safety and the average price, are the main determinants of Beijing consumer’s WTP for the traceable products. On average, consumers are willing to pay a 6% premium for safe, traceable fish products over the price of non-traced products of uncertain safety.

[1]  N. Unusan.  Consumer food safety knowledge and practices in the home in Turkey , 2007 .

[2]  D. Bolton,et al.  Food safety knowledge of head chefs and catering managers in Ireland , 2008 .

[3]  M. Sykuta,et al.  Agricultural Organization in an Era of Traceability , 2005, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[4]  Zhigang Wang,et al.  Chinese consumer demand for food safety attributes in milk products , 2008 .

[5]  Kuo S. Huang,et al.  Demand for Food Quantity and Quality in China , 2007 .

[6]  Spencer Henson,et al.  Consumer Assessment of the Safety of Beef at the Point of Purchase: A Pan-European Study , 2008 .

[7]  M. Woodburn,et al.  Household Food Preparers' Food-Safety Knowledge and Practices Following Widely Publicized Outbreaks of Foodborne Illness. , 1997, Journal of food protection.

[8]  G. Kiziltan,et al.  Food safety in the home consumption of meat in Turkey , 2008 .

[9]  Wei Xia,et al.  Consumer's Attitudes and Willingness-to-Pay for Green Food in Beijing , 2006 .

[10]  A. M. Omemu,et al.  Food safety knowledge and practices of street food vendors in the city of Abeokuta, Nigeria , 2008 .

[11]  M. Loureiro,et al.  A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability , 2007 .

[12]  D. Dickinson,et al.  Experimental Evidence on Willingness to Pay for Red Meat Traceability in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan , 2005, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[13]  M. Jevšnik,et al.  Consumers’ awareness of food safety from shopping to eating , 2008 .

[14]  Jose Maria Gil,et al.  Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain , 2007 .

[15]  P. Kendall,et al.  Consumer food-handling behaviors associated with prevention of 13 foodborne illnesses. , 2003, Journal of food protection.

[16]  Mairead Kiely,et al.  Validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess intake of seafood in adults in three European countries , 2008 .

[17]  Michael G. Linardakis,et al.  Beef traceability: are Greek consumers willing to pay? , 2007 .

[18]  M. Conter,et al.  Consumers’ behaviour toward typical Italian dry sausages , 2008 .

[19]  M. Müller,et al.  Food quality and safety––consumer perception and public health concern , 2005 .

[20]  Sukant K. Misra,et al.  Perception of food safety and changes in food consumption habits: a consumer analysis , 2001 .