Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion

Previous studies have invested much effort in understanding how participation in asynchronous online discussion affects student learning, and what factors influence student participation behavior. Results of these studies have been inconclusive and these investigations are often conducted from isolated perspectives. Relying on social cognitive theory, this study proposes two dynamic student participation models in online dialogue and particularly highlights understudied factors - collective efficacy, social ability, reading behavior, the time dimension of participation - to examine the mediation and causal relationship among those factors and their influence on learning. The models are tested utilizing data collected from a large US university. Specifically, while the predictive constructs are operationalized through the survey instruments, the outcome measures are modeled using electronic trace data and actual evaluation information. Data is analyzed using the Partial Least Squares modeling method. Results demonstrate the intertwined relationship among constructs and a different influencing mechanism for each construct on participation behavior and learning. By comparing these two built models, the time dimension of participation is shown to be more influential in predicting student learning than posting and reading actions. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of this study. Shows two social cognitive theory informed online student participation models.Applies collective efficacy, social ability, and temporal dimensions to online learning.Computational model shows the relationship between participation behavior and learning.The time dimension of model predicts student learning.

[1]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[2]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[3]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 1996, ICIS.

[4]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[5]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  N. Hara STUDENT DISTRESS IN A WEB-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION COURSE , 2000 .

[7]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Jenab Emily Students in Distress , 2015 .

[9]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Measuring Group Efficacy in Virtual Teams , 2006 .

[12]  Greg Boris,et al.  WHAT WORKS: Student Perceptions of Effective Elements in Online Learning , 2004 .

[13]  Jeong-Bae Son,et al.  Online Discussion in a CALL Course for Distance Language Teachers , 2013 .

[14]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences , 2003 .

[15]  Cynthia Lee,et al.  Joint Effects of Group Efficacy and Gender Diversity on Group Cohesion and Performance , 2004 .

[16]  Sunghee Shin,et al.  The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students' interactions during asynchronous online discussions , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Vanessa Paz Dennen,et al.  Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Learning analytics in CSCL with a focus on assessment: an exploratory study of activity theory-informed cluster analysis , 2014, LAK.

[20]  Rui Guo,et al.  Participation-based student final performance prediction model through interpretable Genetic Programming: Integrating learning analytics, educational data mining and theory , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Learning analytics in outer space: a Hidden Naïve Bayes model for automatic student off-task behavior detection , 2015, LAK.

[22]  J. Patel,et al.  Students' Perspective on the Impact of a Web-based Discussion Forum on Student Learning , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.

[23]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Building a Model Explaining the Social Nature of Online Learning , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[24]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Learning analytics at “small” scale , 2015 .

[25]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Modeling Performance in Asynchronous CSCL: An Exploration of Social Ability, Collective Efficacy and Social Interaction , 2015, CSCL.

[26]  R. Slavin Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[27]  Steve Joordens,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students' course performance , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Xin Chen,et al.  "Twitter Archeology" of learning analytics and knowledge conferences , 2015, LAK.

[29]  Errol Yudko,et al.  "Hits" (not "Discussion Posts") predict student success in online courses: A double cross-validation study , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[30]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Vanessa Paz Dennen,et al.  Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Group Learning Assessment: Developing a Theory-Informed Analytics , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[33]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the Footprints Lead: Tracking Down Other Roles for Social Navigation , 2003, Designing Information Spaces.

[34]  James Laffey,et al.  Assessing Social Ability in Online Learning Environments , 2006 .

[35]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[36]  Olabisi Kuboni *,et al.  An assessment of support strategies used to facilitate distance students' participation in a web‐based learning environment in the University of the West Indies , 2004 .

[37]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[39]  Xin Chen,et al.  Learning Analytics at "Small" Scale: Exploring a Complexity-Grounded Model for Assessment Automation , 2015, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[40]  B. A. Conway,et al.  The effects of laforin, malin, Stbd1, and Ptg deficiencies on heart glycogen levels in Pompe disease mouse models , 2015 .

[41]  Selma Vonderwell,et al.  Factors that Influence Participation In Online Learning , 2005 .

[42]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[43]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[44]  Xianhui Wang,et al.  Exploring embodied social presence of youth with Autism in 3D collaborative virtual learning environment: A case study , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Wanli Xing,et al.  Instructional Activities in a Discussion Board Forum of an e-Leaning Management System , 2014, HCI.