Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture–recapture

The number of animals in a population is conventionally estimated by capture–recapture without modelling the spatial relationships between animals and detectors. Problems arise with non-spatial estimators when individuals differ in their exposure to traps or the target population is poorly defined. Spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) methods devised recently to estimate population density largely avoid these problems. Some applications require estimates of population size rather than density, and population size in a defined area may be obtained as a derived parameter from SECR models. While this use of SECR has potential benefits over conventional capture–recapture, including reduced bias, it is unfamiliar to field biologists and no study has examined the precision and robustness of the estimates. We used simulation to compare the performance of SECR and conventional estimators of population size with respect to bias and confidence interval coverage for several spatial scenarios. Three possible estimators for the sampling variance of realised population size all performed well. The precision of SECR estimates was nearly the same as that of the null-model conventional population estimator. SECR estimates of population size were nearly unbiased (relative bias 0–10%) in all scenarios, including surveys in randomly generated patchy landscapes. Confidence interval coverage was near the nominal level. We used SECR to estimate the population of a species of skink Oligosoma infrapunctatum from pitfall trapping. The estimated number in the area bounded by the outermost traps differed little between a homogeneous density model and models with a quadratic trend in density or a habitat effect on density, despite evidence that the latter models fitted better. Extrapolation of trend models to a larger plot may be misleading. To avoid extrapolation, a large region of interest should be sampled throughout, either with one continuous trapping grid or with clusters of traps dispersed widely according to a probability-based and spatially representative sampling design.

[1]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals , 2003, Biometrics.

[2]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. , 2011, Ecology.

[3]  Thomas O. McGarity,et al.  The hierarchical model , 1991 .

[4]  M. Conroy,et al.  Modeling demographic processes in marked populations , 2009 .

[5]  Gary C. White,et al.  Correcting wildlife counts using detection probabilities , 2005 .

[6]  Shirley Pledger,et al.  The Performance of Mixture Models in Heterogeneous Closed Population Capture–Recapture , 2005, Biometrics.

[7]  R. L. Sandland,et al.  Statistical inference for Poisson and multinomial models for capture-recapture experiments , 1984 .

[8]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Estimating Tiger Abundance from Camera Trap Data: Field Surveys and Analytical Issues , 2011 .

[9]  M. Efford Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[10]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[11]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data. , 2008, Ecology.

[12]  S. Pledger Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[13]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatially explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. , 2010, Ecology.

[14]  Jay M Ver Hoef,et al.  A Model‐Based Approach for Making Ecological Inference from Distance Sampling Data , 2010, Biometrics.

[15]  R M Fewster,et al.  Variance Estimation for Systematic Designs in Spatial Surveys , 2011, Biometrics.

[16]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Landscape patterns simulation with a modified random clusters method , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[18]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Density Estimation by Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture: Likelihood-Based Methods , 2009 .

[19]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[20]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  DENSITY: software for analysing capture-recapture data from passive detector arrays , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[21]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies. , 2009, Ecology.

[22]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[23]  Louis-Paul Rivest,et al.  Applications and extensions of Chao's moment estimator for the size of a closed population. , 2007, Biometrics.

[24]  K. Burnham,et al.  Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals , 1978 .

[25]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[26]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. , 2009, Ecology.

[27]  M. Efford,et al.  A field test of two methods for density estimation , 2005 .

[28]  R. Huggins On the statistical analysis of capture experiments , 1989 .