The Effects of Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime

Objective. Focused deterrence strategies are increasingly being applied to prevent and control gang and group-involved violence, overt drug markets, and individual repeat offenders. Given the growing popularity of this approach, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the extant evaluation evidence is needed to determine the crime reduction benefits of the approach. Methods. Our examination of the effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime followed the systematic review protocols and conventions of the Campbell Collaboration. As a preliminary examination of the effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime, the authors used a vote counting procedure. In our closer examination of program effects, meta-analyses were used to determine the size, direction, and statistical significance of the overall impact of focused deterrence strategies on crime. Results. We identified 10 quasi-experimental evaluations and 1 randomized controlled trial. Our meta-analysis suggests that focused deterrence strategies are associated with an overall statistically significant, medium-sized crime reduction effect. However, the strongest program effect sizes were generated by evaluations that used the weakest research designs. Conclusion. The authors conclude that this approach seems very promising in reducing crime but a more rigorous body of evaluation research needs to be developed. While the results of this review are very supportive of deterrence principles, the authors believe that other complementary crime control mechanisms are at work in the focused deterrence strategies described here that need to be highlighted and better understood.

[1]  Rodney K. Brunson,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing and Open-Air Drug Markets , 2013 .

[2]  G. Farrell,et al.  Linking situational crime prevention and focused deterrence strategies , 2013 .

[3]  Henk Elffers,et al.  Research design influence on study outcomes in crime and justice: a partial replication with public area surveillance , 2011 .

[4]  D. Weisburd.  Shifting crime and justice resources from prisons to police: Shifting police from people to places , 2011 .

[5]  Steven N. Durlauf,et al.  Imprisonment and crime , 2011 .

[6]  D. Kennedy.  Pulling Levers: Chronic Offenders, High-Crime Settings, and a Theory of Prevention , 2011 .

[7]  Vassiliy Simchera,et al.  Social Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[8]  Douglas J. Boyle,et al.  The Impact of Newark's Operation Ceasefire on Trauma Center Gunshot Wound Admissions , 2010 .

[9]  Steven N. Durlauf,et al.  Imprisonment and crime Can both be reduced ? , 2010 .

[10]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Making Public Places Safer: Surveillance and Crime Prevention , 2009 .

[11]  M. Kleiman,et al.  “Managing Drug-Involved Probationers With Swift and Certain Sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE. Evaluation Report” NCJ 229023 , 2009 .

[12]  John E. Eck,et al.  The Effects of Problem-Oriented Policing on Crime and Disorder: A Systematic Review , 2008 .

[13]  D. Kennedy.  Deterrence and Crime Prevention: Reconsidering the prospect of sanction , 2008 .

[14]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Pulling levers focused deterrence strategies and the prevention of gun homicide , 2008 .

[15]  Marie Skubak Tillyer,et al.  Locating Focused Deterrence Approaches within a Situational Crime Prevention Framework , 2008 .

[16]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  The Strategic Prevention of Gun Violence Among Gang‐Involved Offenders , 2008 .

[17]  Hannah R. Rothstein,et al.  Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results , 2008 .

[18]  D. Kennedy.  Drugs, Race and Common Ground: Reflections on the High Point Intervention , 2008 .

[19]  Peter K. B. St. Jean,et al.  Pockets of Crime: Broken Windows, Collective Efficacy, and the Criminal Point of View , 2007 .

[20]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research , 2007 .

[21]  Charles F. Klahm.  Reducing Homicide through a "Lever-Pulling" Strategy , 2007 .

[22]  A. Papachristos,et al.  Attention Felons: Evaluating Project Safe Neighborhoods in Chicago , 2007 .

[23]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime , 2007 .

[24]  Lorraine Mazerolle,et al.  Street‐Level Drug Law Enforcement: A Meta‐Analytic Review , 2007 .

[25]  David Hemenway,et al.  Firearms and violence: a critical review , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[26]  John E. Eck,et al.  DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS* , 2006 .

[27]  P. Cook,et al.  Aiming for evidence-based gun policy , 2006 .

[28]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS: OBSERVATIONS ON THE REVERSE OF DISPLACEMENT , 2006 .

[29]  Howard Giles,et al.  Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence , 2005 .

[30]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Hot spots policing and crime prevention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2005 .

[31]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Did Ceasefire, Compstat, and Exile Reduce Homicide? , 2005 .

[32]  T. Tyler.  Enhancing Police Legitimacy , 2004 .

[33]  J. Eck,et al.  What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear? , 2004 .

[34]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Fairness and effectiveness in policing : the evidence , 2004 .

[35]  Clifford A. Grammich,et al.  Reducing Gun Violence: Results from an Intervention in East Los Angeles , 2003 .

[36]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Those Confounded Moderators in Meta-Analysis: Good, Bad, and Ugly , 2003 .

[37]  David M. Kennedy,et al.  Testing for Structural Breaks in the Evaluation of Programs , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[38]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing and Crime Prevention , 2002 .

[39]  Jeffrey Fagan,et al.  Policing guns and youth violence. , 2002, The Future of children.

[40]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Crime: Public policies for crime control , 2002 .

[41]  David B. Wilson.  Meta-Analytic Methods for Criminology , 2001 .

[42]  David P. Farrington,et al.  The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group , 2001 .

[43]  David Weisburd,et al.  Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice? , 2001 .

[44]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime , 2001 .

[45]  A. Piehl,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing, Deterrence, and Youth Violence: An Evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire , 2001 .

[46]  D. Weisburd,et al.  Developing a Multicenter Randomized Trial in Criminology: The Case of HIDTA , 2000 .

[47]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[48]  R. Tweedie,et al.  A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[49]  Leland Wilkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals Guidelines and Explanations , 2005 .

[50]  Elizabeth Wilkinson,et al.  The Task Force on Statistical Inference , 1999 .

[51]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Crime and Justice.

[52]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[53]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. , 1997 .

[54]  A. Piehl,et al.  Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy , 1996 .

[55]  R. Rosenthal.  Parametric measures of effect size. , 1994 .

[56]  Gail Mason,et al.  Design Sensitivity in Criminal Justice Experiments , 1993, Crime and Justice.

[57]  I. Marshall,et al.  RISK PERCEPTIONS AMONG SERIOUS OFFENDERS: THE ROLE OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT* , 1992 .

[58]  Kerry Smith.  State and Local Drug Enforcement: In Search of a Strategy , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[59]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[60]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues , 1987 .

[61]  J. Wilson,et al.  BROKEN WINDOWS: THE POLICE AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SAFETY , 1982 .

[62]  A. Blumstein,et al.  Deterrence and incapacitation : estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates , 1980 .

[63]  P. Cook.  Research in Criminal Deterrence: Laying the Groundwork for the Second Decade , 1980, Crime and Justice.

[64]  P. Shrout.  Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings: by Thomas D. Cook and Donald T. Campbell. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979 , 1980 .

[65]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[66]  Thomas A. Reppetto.  Crime Prevention and the Displacement Phenomenon , 1976 .

[67]  R. Boruch,et al.  3 – Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations In Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate Effects , 1975 .

[68]  J. Gibbs.  Crime, punishment, and deterrence , 1975 .

[69]  F. Zimring,et al.  Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control , 1973 .