Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living

Treatment of joint disease that results in limited flexion is often rejected by patients in non‐Western cultures whose activities of daily living require a higher range of motion at the hip, knee, or ankle. However, limited information is available about the joint kinematics required for high range of motion activities, such as squatting, kneeling, and sitting cross‐legged, making it difficult to design prosthetic implants that will meet the needs of these populations. Therefore, the objective of this work was to generate three‐dimensional kinematics at the hip, knee, and ankle joints of Indian subjects while performing activities of daily living. Thirty healthy Indian subjects (average age: 48.2 ± 7.6 years) were asked to perform six trials of the following activities: squatting, kneeling, and sitting cross‐legged. Floating axis angles were calculated at the joints using the kinematic data collected by an electromagnetic motion tracking device with receivers located on the subject's foot, shank, thigh, and sacrum. A mean maximum flexion of 157° ± 6° at the knee joint was required for squatting with heels up. Mean maximum hip flexion angles reached up to 95° ± 27° for squatting with heels flat. The high standard deviation associated with this activity underscored the large range in maximum hip flexion angles required by different subjects. Mean ankle range of flexion reached 58° ± 14° for the sitting cross‐legged activity. The ranges of motion required to perform the activities studied are greater than that provided by most currently available joint prostheses, demonstrating the need for high range of motion implant design. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res

[1]  Kevin J Deluzio,et al.  Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[2]  U P Wyss,et al.  Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants , 2001, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[3]  P. Costigan,et al.  Radiographic and non-invasive determination of the hip joint center location: effect on hip joint moments. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  W. Wallace,et al.  Effect of total knee arthroplasty on maximal flexion. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Yoshiki Yamano,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI , 2000 .

[6]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Total Ankle Arthroplasty: a Unique Design. Two to Twelve-Year Follow-up* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  R. Villar,et al.  Knee Surgery and the Indian Knee: The Importance of the Preservation of Flexion , 1989, Tropical doctor.

[9]  Harry E Rubash,et al.  Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: An in vitro investigation , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  J. Yamazaki,et al.  Hy-Flex II total knee system and range of motion , 2002, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[12]  U. Singh,et al.  Multiaxial orthotic hip joint for squatting and cross-legged sitting withhip-knee-ankle-foot-orthosis , 1988, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  T. Kepple,et al.  Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait , 1997 .

[14]  Å. Carlsson,et al.  Uncemented STAR Total Ankle Prostheses: Three to Eight-Year Follow-up of Fifty-one Consecutive Ankles , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  S. Banks,et al.  Fluoroscopic analysis of knee arthroplasty kinematics during deep flexion kneeling. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  S. Piazza,et al.  Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  H. Shoji,et al.  Improved range of motion with the Y/S total knee arthroplasty system. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  K. Manal,et al.  Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: an in vivo study. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[19]  P. Wood,et al.  Total ankle replacement: THE RESULTS IN 200 ANKLES , 2003 .

[20]  Å. Ahlberg,et al.  On Geographical Variations in the Normal Range of Joint Motion , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  S. Yoshino,et al.  Recovery of full flexion after total knee replacement in rheumatoid arthritis – a follow-up study , 1997, International Orthopaedics.

[22]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  M S Hefzy,et al.  Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexion: a radiographic assessment. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  M. Conditt,et al.  What Functional Activities Are Important to Patients With Knee Replacements? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  Thomas P Andriacchi,et al.  Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  S. Salm,et al.  Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[28]  K. Bose,et al.  Squatting posture in Asians and development of the inferior hip 'sourci , 1994 .

[29]  C. Myles,et al.  Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? , 2000, Gait & posture.

[30]  M. Ritter,et al.  Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. , 1987, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  M. Akagi,et al.  The Bisurface Total Knee Replacement: A Unique Design for Flexion Four-to-Nine-Year Follow-up Study* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  THE TIME ELEMENT IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY , 1920 .

[34]  Man-Ying Wang,et al.  Squatting exercises in older adults: kinematic and kinetic comparisons. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.