Mechanical properties and histology of cortical bone from younger and older men

Tensile breaking load, strength, strain, modulus of elasticity and density plus the histological structure at the fracture site, were determined for 207 standardized specimens of cortical bone from the embalmed femur, tibia, and fibula of 17 men from 36 to 75 years of age. The men were divided into a younger group (41.5 years old‐avg) and an older group (71 years old‐avg). Specimens from younger men had a greater average breaking load, strength, strain, modulus and density than those from older men. The percentage of spaces in the break area was greater in specimens from older men, but specimens from younger men had a slightly greater percentage of osteons, osteon fragments, and interstitial lamellae. The number of osteons/mm2 and of osteon fragments/mm2 was greater in specimens from older men but the average area/osteon and area/osteon fragment was greater in specimens from younger men. Thus, there are quantitative and qualitative differences in the histological structure of bone from younger and older men. Differences in the tensile properties of bone from younger and older men can be explained by histological differences in the bone.

[1]  W. D. Means Stress and Strain: Basic Concepts of Continuum Mechanics for Geologists , 1976 .

[2]  A. Burstein,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone , 1974 .

[3]  J Black,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of viable human cortical bone. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  C. Wilson Age related changes in the compressive strength and bone mineral per unit volume of compact bone , 1973 .

[5]  I. J. Singh,et al.  Estimation of age at death in human males from quantitative histology of bone fragments. , 1970, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  J. Currey The Mechanical Properties of Bone , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  Tensile strength of bone along and across the grain. , 1961, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  Frost Hm Measurement of osteocytes per unit volume and volume components of osteocytes and canaliculae in man. , 1960 .

[9]  F. G. Evans,et al.  An Apparatus for Determining BoneDensity by Means of RadioactiveStrontium (Sr90) , 1951 .

[10]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Regional differences in some of the physical properties of the human femur. , 1951, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Differences and relationships between the physical properties and the microscopic structure of human femoral, tibial and fibular cortical bone , 1967 .

[12]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Physical and Histological Differences between Human Fibular and Femoral Compact Bone , 1966 .

[13]  H M FROST,et al.  Measurement of osteocytes per unit volume and volume components of osteocytes and canaliculae in man. , 1960, Henry Ford Hospital medical bulletin.

[14]  J. Currey,et al.  Differences in the tensile strength of bone of different histological types. , 1959, Journal of anatomy.

[15]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Relations between the microscopic structure and tensile strength of human bone. , 1958, Acta anatomica.

[16]  M. Lebow,et al.  An apparatus for determining bone density by means of radioactive strontium (Sr90)1. , 1951, Science.

[17]  Med. Hermann Matti Die Knochenbrüche und ihre Behandlung: Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte, Erster Band , 1918 .

[18]  Strength of Materials , 1908, Nature.