Ribosome structure: revisiting the connection between translational accuracy and unconventional decoding

Abstract The ribosome is a molecular machine that converts genetic information in the form of RNA, into protein. Recent structural studies reveal a complex set of interactions between the ribosome and its ligands, mRNA and tRNA, that indicate ways in which the ribosome could avoid costly translational errors. Ribosomes must decode each successive codon accurately, and structural data provide a clear indication of how ribosomes limit recruitment of the wrong tRNA (sense errors). In a triplet-based genetic code there are three potential forward reading frames, only one of which encodes the correct protein. Errors in which the ribosome reads a codon out of the normal reading frame (frameshift errors) occur less frequently than sense errors, although it is not clear from structural data how these errors are avoided. Some mRNA sequences, termed programmed-frameshift sites, cause the ribosome to change reading frame. Based on recent work on these sites, this article proposes that the ribosome uses the structure of the codon–anticodon complex formed by the peptidyl-tRNA, especially its wobble interaction, to constrain the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA to the correct reading frame.

[1]  J. F. Curran,et al.  Decoding with the A:I wobble pair is inefficient. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  C. Thomas,et al.  Decoding fidelity at the ribosomal A and P sites: influence of mutations in three different regions of the decoding domain in 16S rRNA. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  T. Pape,et al.  Conformational switch in the decoding region of 16S rRNA during aminoacyl-tRNA selection on the ribosome , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  J. Roth.  Frameshift suppression , 1981, Cell.

[5]  R. Palotai,et al.  Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: an extended view of binding events , 2010 .

[6]  D. Riddle,et al.  Frameshift suppression: a nucleotide addition in the anticodon of a glycine transfer RNA. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[7]  P. Farabaugh,et al.  A novel programed frameshift expresses the POL3 gene of retrotransposon Ty3 of yeast: Frameshifting without tRNA slippage , 1993, Cell.

[8]  Philip J. Farabaugh,et al.  Ribosomal frameshifting in the yeast retrotransposon Ty: tRNAs induce slippage on a 7 nucleotide minimal site , 1990, Cell.

[9]  P. Farabaugh,et al.  Programmed +1 frameshifting stimulated by complementarity between a downstream mRNA sequence and an error-correcting region of rRNA. , 2001, RNA.

[10]  P. Farabaugh,et al.  A new model for phenotypic suppression of frameshift mutations by mutant tRNAs. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[11]  T. Earnest,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Ribosome at 5.5 Å Resolution , 2001, Science.

[12]  M Yarus,et al.  tRNA-tRNA interactions within cellular ribosomes. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  P. Farabaugh.  Programmed translational frameshifting. , 1996, Annual review of genetics.

[14]  K. Nierhaus,et al.  Codon-anticodon interaction at the ribosomal P site improves the accuracy of the decoding process. , 1984, Biochemistry international.

[15]  T. Pape,et al.  Induced fit in initial selection and proofreading of aminoacyl‐tRNA on the ribosome , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[16]  A. Pavesi,et al.  Transfer RNA gene redundancy and translational selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  C. Vonrhein,et al.  Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit , 2000, Nature.

[18]  A E Dahlberg,et al.  A conformational switch in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA during decoding of messenger RNA. , 1997, Science.

[19]  Måns Ehrenberg,et al.  Limitations of translational accuracy , 1996 .

[20]  F. Schluenzen,et al.  Structure of Functionally Activated Small Ribosomal Subunit at 3.3 Å Resolution , 2000, Cell.

[21]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Structure of the 30 S ribosomal subunit , 2022 .

[22]  C. Kurland,et al.  Translational accuracy and the fitness of bacteria. , 1992, Annual review of genetics.

[23]  Harry F. Noller,et al.  The Path of Messenger RNA through the Ribosome , 2001, Cell.

[24]  I. Brierley,et al.  Characterization of an efficient coronavirus ribosomal frameshifting signal: Requirement for an RNA pseudoknot , 1989, Cell.

[25]  J. Ninio.  Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination. , 1975, Biochimie.

[26]  Francis Crick,et al.  The Genetic Code for Proteins , 1963 .

[27]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interactions with antibiotics , 2000, Nature.

[28]  P. Farabaugh,et al.  Near-cognate peptidyl-tRNAs promote +1 programmed translational frameshifting in yeast. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[29]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Recognition of Cognate Transfer RNA by the 30S Ribosomal Subunit , 2001, Science.

[30]  K. Lieberman,et al.  Genetic probes of ribosomal RNA function. , 1995, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[31]  H. Varmus,et al.  Signals for ribosomal frameshifting in the rous sarcoma virus gag-pol region , 1988, Cell.

[32]  F. Schluenzen,et al.  Structure of Functionally Activated Small Ribosomal Subunit , 2000 .

[33]  R. Thompson.  EFTu provides an internal kinetic standard for translational accuracy. , 1988, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[34]  R A Sayle,et al.  RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[35]  S. Brenner,et al.  General Nature of the Genetic Code for Proteins , 1961, Nature.

[36]  J. Hopfield.  Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  P. Farabaugh.  Programmed +1 Frameshifting , 1997 .

[38]  H. Noller,et al.  The 530 loop of 16S rRNA: a signal to EF-Tu? , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.