A study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance.

BACKGROUND Markers that predict the behaviour of localised prostate cancer are needed to identify patients that require treatment. OBJECTIVE We have analysed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) generated from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) with respect to repeat biopsy findings and time to radical treatment in patients in a prospective study of active surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Some 86 men recruited between 2002 and 2006 were followed for a median of 29 mo. Patients had clinical stage T1/T2a N0/Nx M0/Mx adenocarcinoma of the prostate, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level<15 ng/ml, Gleason score≤7, primary Gleason grade≤3, and positive biopsy cores (pbc)≤50%. MEASUREMENTS All patients had DW-MRI in addition to standard MRI sequences. Tumour regions of interest (ROIs) were identified using T2-weighted fast-spin echo images as focal areas of restricted diffusion. Univariate analyses including all clinical variables and tumour ADC data were performed with respect to repeat biopsy findings and time to radical treatment. Receiver operating curves (ROC) compared predictive variables. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Patients in the study had a median age of 66 yr and a median initial PSA level of 6.7 ng/ml. Some 39 patients (45%) received deferred radical treatment, and 34 patients (40%) had adverse histology on repeat biopsy. According to univariate analysis, tumour ADC was a significant predictor of both adverse repeat biopsy findings (p<0.0001; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-1.6), and time to radical treatment (p<0.0001; HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2-1.8). ROC curves for ADC showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7 for prediction of adverse repeat biopsy findings and an AUC of 0.83 for prediction of radical treatment. CONCLUSIONS In patients with low-risk, localised disease, tumour ADC on DW-MRI may be a useful marker of prostate cancer progression and may help to identify patients who stand to benefit from radical treatment. This possibility warrants further study.

[1]  K. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Endorectal diffusion‐weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Predictors of histological disease progression in untreated, localized prostate cancer. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[3]  J. Hanley,et al.  Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1999, JAMA.

[4]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Prostate‐specific antigen velocity in untreated, localized prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[5]  Fernando J. Kim,et al.  Combined T 2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer , 2007 .

[6]  N M deSouza,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[7]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance? , 2008, Radiology.

[9]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Long-term outcome among men with conservatively treated localised prostate cancer , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Alan Horwich,et al.  Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. , 2008, European urology.

[12]  C. Parker,et al.  Active Surveillance With Selective Radical Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer , 2007, Cancer journal.

[13]  Stefan A Reinsberg,et al.  Combined use of diffusion-weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  A. Villers,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Donald E Bailey,et al.  Active surveillance for early‐stage prostate cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[16]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Adult urologyUrological survey: urological oncology: prostate cancerPretreatment PSA Velocity and Risk of Death From Prostate Cancer Following External Beam Radiation Therapy , 2006 .

[17]  M. Kattan A nomogram for predicting 10-year life expectancy in men with prostate cancer after definitive therapy , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[18]  D. Gleason Classification of prostatic carcinomas. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[19]  M. Kattan,et al.  Pretreatment nomogram predicting ten-year biochemical outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2007, Urology.

[20]  P. Walsh,et al.  Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[21]  A. Hanlon,et al.  A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  S B Malkowicz,et al.  Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy , External Beam Radiation Therapy , or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2000 .

[23]  S. Kyriazi,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[24]  J K Smith,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[25]  P. Walsh,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[26]  C. Ling,et al.  Predictors of improved outcome for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen ablation therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Takeo Ishigaki,et al.  Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Correlation of diffusion-weighted MRI with whole mount radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  Gleason Df Classification of prostatic carcinomas. , 1966 .

[30]  J C Gore,et al.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.