Influence of the Mechanical Properties of Third-Generation Artificial Turf Systems on Soccer Players’ Physiological and Physical Performance and Their Perceptions

The aim of this research was to evaluate the influence of the mechanical properties of artificial turf systems on soccer players’ performance. A battery of perceptive physiological and physical tests were developed on four different structural systems of artificial turf (System 1: Compacted gravel sub-base without elastic layer; System 2: Compacted gravel sub-base with elastic layer; System 3: Asphalt sub-base without elastic layer; System 4: Asphalt sub-base with elastic layer). The sample was composed of 18 soccer players (22.44±1.72 years) who typically train and compete on artificial turf. The artificial turf system with less rotational traction (S3) showed higher total time in the Repeated Sprint Ability test in comparison to the systems with intermediate values (49.46±1.75 s vs 47.55±1.82 s (S1) and 47.85±1.59 s (S2); p<0.001). The performance in jumping tests (countermovement jump and squat jump) and ball kicking to goal decreased after the RSA test in all surfaces assessed (p<0.05), since the artificial turf system did not affect performance deterioration (p>0.05). The physiological load was similar in all four artificial turf systems. However, players felt more comfortable on the harder and more rigid system (S4; visual analogue scale = 70.83±14.28) than on the softer artificial turf system (S2; visual analogue scale = 54.24±19.63). The lineal regression analysis revealed a significant influence of the mechanical properties of the surface of 16.5%, 15.8% and 7.1% on the mean time of the sprint, the best sprint time and the maximum mean speed in the RSA test respectively. Results suggest a mechanical heterogeneity between the systems of artificial turf which generate differences in the physical performance and in the soccer players’ perceptions.

[1]  B. Dawson-Hughes,et al.  Cycling and running tests of repeated sprint ability , 1993 .

[2]  P. Willems,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  B Dawson,et al.  The energy cost of running on grass compared to soft dry beach sand. , 2001, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[4]  Peter Krustrup,et al.  Physiological demands of top-class soccer refereeing in relation to physical capacity: effect of intense intermittent exercise training , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  Amy E. Kerdok,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  S. Dixon,et al.  Impact absorption of tennis shoe-surface combinations , 2003 .

[7]  D. Bishop A comparison between land and sand-based tests for beach volleyball assessment. , 2003, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[8]  John Standeven,et al.  A comparison of artificial turf. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  I. Kollias,et al.  Biomechanical differences in elite beach-volleyball players in vertical squat jump on rigid and sand surface. , 2004, Sports biomechanics.

[10]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  D. Bishop,et al.  Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Repeated-Sprint Activities , 2005, Sports medicine.

[12]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand. , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[13]  Eric A Nauman,et al.  Peak Torque and Rotational Stiffness Developed at the Shoe-Surface Interface , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  B Dawson,et al.  Reliability of a repeated-sprint test for field-hockey. , 2006, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[15]  L. Alegre,et al.  Assessment of power output in jump tests for applicants to a sports sciences degree. , 2006, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[16]  Kevin R Ford,et al.  Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf. , 2006, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[17]  V. Kalapotharakos,et al.  Physiological characteristics of elite professional soccer teams of different ranking. , 2006, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[18]  T Timpka,et al.  Risk of injury in elite football played on artificial turf versus natural grass: a prospective two-cohort study , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[19]  L. Mcnaughton,et al.  A continuous mental task decreases the physiological response to soccer-specific intermittent exercise , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[20]  Jonathan Bloomfield,et al.  Physical Demands of Different Positions in FA Premier League Soccer. , 2007, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[21]  Colin W Fuller,et al.  Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 1: match injuries , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[22]  Carlo Castagna,et al.  Factors influencing physiological responses to small-sided soccer games , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[23]  Thomas Reilly,et al.  The Role of Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer , 2008, Sports medicine.

[24]  David B Pyne,et al.  Relationships Between Repeated Sprint Testing, Speed, and Endurance , 2008, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  C. Castagna,et al.  Sprint vs. interval training in football. , 2008, International journal of sports medicine.

[26]  C. Castagna,et al.  The Five-Jump Test for Distance as a Field Test to Assess Lower Limb Explosive Power in Soccer Players , 2008, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[27]  Björn Ekblom,et al.  Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: Movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[28]  C. Castagna,et al.  Effect of Recovery Mode on Repeated Sprint Ability in Young Basketball Players , 2008, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[29]  Study of shockpads as energy absorption layer in artificial turf surfaces , 2008 .

[30]  E Alcántara,et al.  Analysis of the influence of rubber infill morphology on the mechanical performance of artificial turf surfaces for soccer , 2009 .

[31]  F. Merni,et al.  Comparison of Physiological Responses to an Incremental Running Test on Treadmill, Natural Grass, and Synthetic Turf in Young Soccer Players , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[32]  John W Powell,et al.  Football Playing Surface and Shoe Design Affect Rotational Traction , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[33]  Elisabetta M Zanetti,et al.  Amateur football game on artificial turf: players' perceptions. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[34]  R. Malina,et al.  Characteristics of youth soccer players who drop out, persist or move up , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[35]  R. Haut,et al.  The effects of various infills, fibre structures, and shoe designs on generating rotational traction on an artificial surface , 2009 .

[36]  Jon L Oliver,et al.  Is a fatigue index a worthwhile measure of repeated sprint ability? , 2009, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[37]  Pedro Pérez Soriano,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL FACTORS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT TO PREVENT INJURIES AND IMPROVE SPORTING PERFORMANCE ON ARTIFICIAL TURF , 2009 .

[38]  C. Castagna,et al.  Intermittent Endurance and Repeated Sprint Ability in Soccer Players , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[39]  Carlo Castagna,et al.  The validity and reliability of a global positioning satellite system device to assess speed and repeated sprint ability (RSA) in athletes. , 2010, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[40]  Rudy Verhelst,et al.  Football-specific evaluation of player–surface interaction on different football turf systems , 2010 .

[41]  Thorsten Sterzing,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of player-surface interaction on artificial soccer turf , 2010, Sports biomechanics.

[42]  M. Buchheit Performance and physiological responses to repeated-sprint and jump sequences , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[43]  Benjamin Cooper,et al.  Effect of loading condition on the traction coefficient between shoes and artificial turf surfaces , 2010 .

[44]  J. Dragoo,et al.  The Effect of Playing Surface on Injury Rate , 2010, Sports medicine.

[45]  Kathryn A. Severn,et al.  Science of synthetic turf surfaces: Player–surface interactions , 2010 .

[46]  Jerry L Mayhew,et al.  Comparison of Speed and Agility Performance of College Football Players on Field Turf and Natural Grass , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[47]  Wolfgang Potthast,et al.  Motion differences in goal kicking on natural and artificial soccer turf systems , 2010 .

[48]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Identification of critical traction values for maximum athletic performance , 2011 .

[49]  J Ekstrand,et al.  Comparison of injuries sustained on artificial turf and grass by male and female elite football players , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[50]  Leonor Gallardo,et al.  Mechanical assessment of artificial turf football pitches: The consequences of no quality certification , 2012 .

[51]  A. Rebelo,et al.  The influence of the playing surface on the exercise intensity of small-sided recreational soccer games. , 2012, Human movement science.

[52]  L. Nybo,et al.  Physiological Responses and Physical Performance during Football in the Heat , 2012, PloS one.

[53]  Matthew C. Varley,et al.  Validity and reliability of GPS for measuring instantaneous velocity during acceleration, deceleration, and constant motion , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[54]  D. Mcghie,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Surface-Athlete Impacts on Third-Generation Artificial Turf , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[55]  Paul M. Smith,et al.  Effects of playing surface on physiological responses and performance variables in a controlled football simulation , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[56]  N. White,et al.  The Effect of Carbohydrate Ingestion on Performance during a Simulated Soccer Match , 2013, Nutrients.

[57]  A. Rebelo,et al.  Anthropometric Characteristics, Physical Fitness and Technical Performance of Under-19 Soccer Players by Competitive Level and Field Position , 2012, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[58]  S. Berthoin,et al.  Physical performance and subjective ratings after a soccer-specific exercise simulation: Comparison of natural grass versus artificial turf , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[59]  José L Felipe,et al.  Effect of the structural components of support on the loss of mechanical properties of football fields of artificial turf , 2014 .

[60]  Gijs Debuyck,et al.  Cutting performance wearing different studded soccer shoes on dry and wet artificial turf , 2014 .

[61]  A. Gallardo,et al.  Artificial turf surfaces: Perception of safety, sporting feature, satisfaction and preference of football users , 2014, European journal of sport science.

[62]  The Effect of Natural and Artificial Grass on Sprinting Performance in Young Soccer Players , 2014 .

[63]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Shoe traction and surface compliance affect performance of soccer-related movements , 2014 .

[64]  W. Gage,et al.  The perceptions of professional soccer players on the risk of injury from competition and training on natural grass and 3rd generation artificial turf , 2014, BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[65]  Ewald M. Hennig Plantar pressure measurements for the evaluation of shoe comfort, overuse injuries and performance in soccer , 2014 .