Towards a framework for computational persuasion with applications in behaviour change

Persuasion is an activity that involves one party trying to induce another party to believe something or to do something. It is an important and multifaceted human facility. Obviously, sales and marketing is heavily dependent on persuasion. But many other activities involve persuasion such as a doctor persuading a patient to drink less alcohol, a road safety expert persuading drivers to not text while driving, or an online safety expert persuading users of social media sites to not reveal too much personal information online. As computing becomes involved in every sphere of life, so too is persuasion a target for applying computer-based solutions. An automated persuasion system (APS) is a system that can engage in a dialogue with a user (the persuadee) in order to persuade the persuadee to do (or not do) some action or to believe (or not believe) something. To do this, an APS aims to use convincing arguments in order to persuade the persuadee. Computational persuasion is the study of formal models of dialogues involving arguments and counterarguments, of user models, and strategies, for APSs. A promising application area for computational persuasion is in behaviour change. Within healthcare organizations, government agencies, and non-governmental agencies, there is much interest in changing behaviour of particular groups of people away from actions that are harmful to themselves and/or to others around them.

[1]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: Supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches , 2017, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[2]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Empirical Methods for Modelling Persuadees in Dialogical Argumentation , 2017, 2017 IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI).

[3]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Belief in Attacks in Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation , 2017, SUM.

[4]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Probabilistic Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation Frameworks , 2017, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[5]  Nico Potyka,et al.  Updating Probabilistic Epistemic States in Persuasion Dialogues , 2017, ECSQARU.

[6]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Adapting Healthy Eating Messages to Personality , 2017, PERSUASIVE.

[7]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in Persuasion , 2017, EACL.

[8]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Proof with and without probabilities , 2017, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[9]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Strategic Sequences of Arguments for Persuasion Using Decision Trees , 2017, AAAI.

[10]  Elizabeth Black,et al.  Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Antonomous Agents and Multiagent Sytems , 2017, AAMAS 2017.

[11]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Proof with and without probabilities - Correct evidential reasoning with presumptive arguments, coherent hypotheses and degrees of uncertainty , 2017, Artif. Intell. Law.

[12]  Henry Prakken,et al.  A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks , 2017, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[13]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Providing Arguments in Discussions on the Basis of the Prediction of Human Argumentative Behavior , 2016, ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst..

[14]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation , 2016, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[15]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Computationally Viable Handling of Beliefs in Arguments for Persuasion , 2016, 2016 IEEE 28th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI).

[16]  Anthony Hunter.  Persuasion Dialogues via Restricted Interfaces Using Probabilistic Argumentation , 2016, SUM.

[17]  Mare Koit.  Influencing the Beliefs of a Dialogue Partner , 2016, AIMSA.

[18]  Pietro Baroni,et al.  Discontinuity-Free Decision Support with Quantitative Argumentation Debates , 2016, KR.

[19]  Hannes Strass,et al.  Summary Report of The First International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation , 2016, AI Mag..

[20]  Paolo Torroni,et al.  Argumentation Mining , 2016, ACM Trans. Internet Techn..

[21]  Nicolas Maudet,et al.  A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation , 2016, AAAI.

[22]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Persuasive Strategies for Encouraging Social Interaction for Older Adults , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Anthony Hunter.  Two Dimensional Uncertainty in Persuadee Modelling in Argumentation , 2016, ECAI.

[24]  Leonie Moench,et al.  The Logic of Real Arguments , 1989 .

[25]  Esteban Guerrero,et al.  An activity-centric argumentation framework for assistive technology aimed at improving health , 2016, Argument Comput..

[26]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategical Argumentative Agent for Human Persuasion , 2016, ECAI.

[27]  Madalina Croitoru,et al.  Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement , 2015, BIH.

[28]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Reasons and Options for Updating an Opponent Model in Persuasion Dialogues , 2015, TAFA.

[29]  Sébastien Konieczny,et al.  Extension Enforcement in Abstract Argumentation as an Optimization Problem , 2015, IJCAI.

[30]  Nicolas Maudet,et al.  Optimization of Probabilistic Argumentation with Markov Decision Models , 2015, IJCAI.

[31]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Modelling the Persuadee in Asymmetric Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion , 2015, IJCAI.

[32]  Martin Diller,et al.  An Extension-Based Approach to Belief Revision in Abstract Argumentation , 2015, IJCAI.

[33]  Serena Villata,et al.  Emotions in Argumentation: an Empirical Evaluation , 2015, IJCAI.

[34]  Stefan Woltran,et al.  Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation – A survey , 2015, Artif. Intell..

[35]  G. Maio,et al.  The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change , 2015 .

[36]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Providing Arguments in Discussions Based on the Prediction of Human Argumentative Behavior , 2015, AAAI.

[37]  Sébastien Konieczny,et al.  A Translation-Based Approach for Revision of Argumentation Frameworks , 2014, JELIA.

[38]  Anthony Hunter.  Probabilistic Strategies in Dialogical Argumentation , 2014, SUM.

[39]  Nava Tintarev,et al.  Formal Arguments, Preferences, and Natural Language Interfaces to Humans: an Empirical Evaluation , 2014, ECAI.

[40]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Probabilistic Argumentation with Incomplete Information , 2014, ECAI.

[41]  Elizabeth Black,et al.  Automated Planning of Simple Persuasion Dialogues , 2014, CLIMA.

[42]  Sébastien Konieczny,et al.  On the Revision of Argumentation Systems: Minimal Change of Arguments Statuses , 2014, KR.

[43]  Matthias Thimm,et al.  Strategic Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems , 2014, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[44]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Defeasible logic programming: DeLP-servers, contextual queries, and explanations for answers , 2014, Argument Comput..

[45]  Francesca Toni,et al.  A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation , 2014, Argument Comput..

[46]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Constructing argument graphs with deductive arguments: a tutorial , 2014, Argument Comput..

[47]  Henry Prakken,et al.  The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial , 2014, Argument Comput..

[48]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Probabilistic Argument Graphs for Argumentation Lotteries , 2014, COMMA.

[49]  Leila Amgoud,et al.  Ranking-Based Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks , 2013, SUM.

[50]  Anthony Hunter.  Modelling Uncertainty in Persuasion , 2013, SUM.

[51]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Enforcement in Argumentation Is a Kind of Update , 2013, SUM.

[52]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Opponent Modelling in Persuasion Dialogues , 2013, IJCAI.

[53]  Nir Oren,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Opponent Models with Uncertainty for Strategic Argumentation , 2022 .

[54]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Persuasive dialogue for older adults: promoting and encouraging social interaction , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[55]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments , 2013, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[57]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  A Numerical Approach to the Merging of Argumentation Networks , 2012, CLIMA.

[58]  Ringo Baumann.  What Does it Take to Enforce an Argument? Minimal Change in abstract Argumentation , 2012, ECAI.

[59]  Matthias Thimm,et al.  A Probabilistic Semantics for abstract Argumentation , 2012, ECAI.

[60]  H. Hoeken,et al.  Arguing about desirable consequences: What constitutes a convincing argument? , 2012 .

[61]  U. Hahn,et al.  Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentation , 2012 .

[62]  Matthijs Jan Zwinderman,et al.  Phone Row: A Smartphone Game Designed to Persuade People to Engage in Moderate-Intensity Physical Activity , 2012, PERSUASIVE.

[63]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Less Fizzy Drinks: A Multi-method Study of Persuasive Reminders , 2012, PERSUASIVE.

[64]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Persuasion Strategies for Argumentation about Plans , 2012, COMMA.

[65]  Francesca Toni,et al.  Mechanism Design for Argumentation-based Persuasion , 2012, COMMA.

[66]  Nir Oren,et al.  Group Persuasion through Uncertain Audience Modelling , 2012, COMMA.

[67]  Anthony Hunter.  Some Foundations for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation , 2012, COMMA.

[68]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon.  Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive? , 2012, Logic Programs, Norms and Action.

[69]  Tjitze Rienstra.  Towards a Probabilistic Dung-style Argumentation System , 2012, AT.

[70]  Pietro Baroni,et al.  AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[71]  Pietro Baroni,et al.  An introduction to argumentation semantics , 2011, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[72]  Farid Nouioua,et al.  Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities , 2011, SUM.

[73]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: Towards a better understanding , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[74]  Nir Oren,et al.  Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks , 2011, TAFA.

[75]  Francesca Toni,et al.  Assumption-Based Argumentation Dialogues , 2011, IJCAI.

[76]  Martyn Lloyd-Kelly,et al.  Arguing about Emotion , 2011, UMAP Workshops.

[77]  Nicolas Maudet,et al.  On the outcomes of multiparty persuasion , 2011, AAMAS.

[78]  Herbert W. Simons,et al.  Persuasion in Society , 2011 .

[79]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[80]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Behavioral Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of Reinstatement , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[81]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution , 2010, COMMA.

[82]  Ringo Baumann,et al.  Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results , 2010, COMMA.

[83]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Features in Six Weight Loss Websites: A Qualitative Evaluation , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[84]  Ilkka Korhonen,et al.  Facilitation of Goal-Setting and Follow-Up in an Internet Intervention for Health and Wellness , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[85]  A. McGuire,et al.  Beneficent Persuasion: Techniques and Ethical Guidelines to Improve Patients’ Decisions , 2010, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[86]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[87]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[88]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation , 2009, Stud Logica.

[89]  A Characterisation of Strategy-Proofness for Grounded Argumentation Semantics , 2009, IJCAI.

[90]  Sanjay Modgil,et al.  Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[91]  Nir Oren,et al.  Arguing Using Opponent Models , 2009, ArgMAS.

[92]  Chris Reed,et al.  Strategic Argumentation in Rigorous Persuasion Dialogue , 2009, ArgMAS.

[93]  Wenji Mao,et al.  Emotion as an Argumentation Engine: Modeling the Role of Emotion in Negotiation , 2009 .

[94]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  An inquiry dialogue system , 2008, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[95]  Paul-Amaury Matt,et al.  A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation , 2008, JELIA.

[96]  Anthony Hunter.  Reasoning about the Appropriateness of Proponents for Arguments , 2008, AAAI.

[97]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Pareto Optimality in Abstract Argumentation , 2008, AAAI.

[98]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game-Theoretical Investigation , 2008, COMMA 2008.

[99]  Suresh Manandhar,et al.  Argumentative Human Computer Dialogue for Automated Persuasion , 2008, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[100]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Designing Persuasive Dialogue Systems: Using Argumentation with Care , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[101]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Mechanism design for abstract argumentation , 2008, AAMAS.

[102]  C. L. Hamblin.  Mathematical models of dialogue1 , 2008 .

[103]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation , 2008, Comma.

[104]  Chris Reed,et al.  Argumentation Schemes , 2008 .

[105]  Fu-Ren Lin,et al.  The design and evaluation of an intelligent sales agent for online persuasion and negotiation , 2007, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[106]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Persuasive Effects of Embodied Conversational Agent Teams , 2007, HCI.

[107]  J. Richardson.  Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis , 2007 .

[108]  Anthony Hunter,et al.  Elements of Argumentation , 2007, ECSQARU.

[109]  Floriana Grasso,et al.  Exciting Avocados and Dull Pears Combining Behavioural and Argumentative Theory for Producing Effective Advice , 2007 .

[110]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Audiences in argumentation frameworks , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[111]  Henry Prakken,et al.  DOI: 10.1017/S000000000000000 Printed in the United Kingdom Formal systems for persuasion dialogue , 2022 .

[112]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Fundamentals of critical argumentation , 2006, Critical reasoning and argumentation.

[113]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument , 2005, J. Log. Comput..

[114]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation , 2005, J. Log. Comput..

[115]  Henri Prade,et al.  Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[116]  C. Cayrol,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks , 2005, ECSQARU.

[117]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Persuasive political argument , 2005 .

[118]  Anthony Hunter.  Towards higher impact argumentation , 2004, NMR.

[119]  Anthony Hunter.  Making Argumentation More Believable , 2004, AAAI.

[120]  Peter McBurney,et al.  A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase Negotiations , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[121]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks , 2002, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[122]  Floriana Grasso,et al.  Rhetorical Coding of Health Promotion Dialogues , 2003, AIME.

[123]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon.  Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[124]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[125]  Robert J. Gula.  Nonsense: Red Herrings, Straw Men and Sacred Cows: How We Abuse Logic in Our Everyday Language , 2002 .

[126]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents , 2002, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[127]  Floriana Grasso,et al.  Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[128]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation , 2000, ECAI.

[129]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Dialogue in Team Formation , 2000, Issues in Agent Communication.

[130]  Floriana Grasso,et al.  A Conversational Model for Health Promotion on the World Wide Web , 1999, AIMDM.

[131]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions , 1998, CHI.

[132]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[133]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[134]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[135]  Anthony Osley.  Persuading the people , 1995 .

[136]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[137]  L. R. Goldberg.  The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[138]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Psychological Barriers to Behavior Change: How to indentify the barriers that inhibit change. , 1992, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[139]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Argumentation: Planning Other Agents' Plans , 1989, IJCAI.

[140]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation , 1989 .

[141]  V. Gold.  Covert Advocacy: Reflections on the Use of Psychological Persuasion Techniques in the Courtroom , 1987 .

[142]  S. Britten.  Planning for persuasion. , 1985, Medicine and war.

[143]  N. Niven,et al.  Health psychology. , 1982, Nursing times.

[144]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[145]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[146]  Jim D. Mackenzie,et al.  Question-begging in non-cumulative systems , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[147]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. , 1974 .

[148]  A. Eagly,et al.  ATTITUDE TOWARD THE COMMUNICATOR, PERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATION CONTENT, AND ATTITUDE CHANGE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.