Advances in imaging the neurovascular bundle

Purpose of review Much of the progress in improving potency outcomes after radical prostatectomy has been achieved due to a better visualization of the neurovascular bundle responsible for erectile function. We review the current literature evaluating the existing imaging modalities to image the neurovascular bundle around the prostate pre, intra, and postoperatively, thereby enabling development of surgical techniques for better preservation of nerve function. Recent findings Imaging modalities like multiphoton microscopy, optical coherence tomography, Coherent anti-Raman spectroscopy, exogenous fluoroscopy using prostate-specific membrane antigen, and so on have led to a better appreciation of the neurovascular bundle, thus encouraging novel techniques in nerve preservation during radical prostatectomy. Summary In an age of heightened patient expectations and increasing life expectancy, better visualization of the neurovascular bundle around the prostate using novel imaging modalities may provide breakthroughs in improving potency outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

[1]  W. Catalona,et al.  Efficacy of first-generation Cavermap to verify location and function of cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional evaluation by experienced surgeons. , 2001, Urology.

[2]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Label-free high-resolution imaging of prostate glands and cavernous nerves using coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[3]  T. Sebo,et al.  Increased optical magnification from 2.5x to 4.3x with technical modification lowers the positive margin rate in open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[4]  L. Tanoue Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2010 .

[5]  D. Piston,et al.  Multi-photon excitation imaging of dynamic processes in living cells and tissues. , 2008, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[6]  M. Harisinghani,et al.  Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. , 2009, Urologic oncology.

[7]  A. Mccullough Rehabilitation of erectile function following radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Asian journal of andrology.

[8]  L. Klotz,et al.  Early experience with intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy. , 1999, Urology.

[9]  A. Tewari,et al.  Nerve sparing can preserve orgasmic function in most men after robotic‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2012, BJU international.

[10]  Soroush Rais-Bahrami,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of cavernous nerves: a step toward real-time intraoperative imaging during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Urology.

[11]  Soroush Rais-Bahrami,et al.  Imaging the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate using optical coherence tomography , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[12]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Sexual dysfunction after pelvic surgery , 2006, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[13]  K. McVary,et al.  Post-radical prostatectomy penile blood flow: assessment with color flow Doppler ultrasound. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[14]  P. J. Donker,et al.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. 1982. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  Second prize: preliminary experience with the Niris optical coherence tomography system during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[16]  Takeshi Yoshida,et al.  Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. , 2004, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[17]  Benjamin Kaffenberger,et al.  The use of high resolution optical coherence tomography to evaluate robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[18]  Michael A Fiddy,et al.  Combined image-processing algorithms for improved optical coherence tomography of prostate nerves. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[19]  P. Walsh,et al.  Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[20]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Peterson,et al.  Variability of results of cavernous nerve stimulation during radical prostatectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[23]  A. Tewari,et al.  The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri‐zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve‐sparing prostatectomy , 2006, BJU international.

[24]  A. Labanaris,et al.  The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy , 2009, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[25]  P. J. Donker,et al.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. , 1982, The Journal of urology.

[26]  G. Jakse,et al.  Quality of life following radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[27]  M. Kattan,et al.  Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[28]  I. Nadelhaft,et al.  Visualization of the neurovascular bundles and major pelvic ganglion with fluorescent tracers after penile injection in the rat , 2008, BJU international.

[29]  P. Walsh,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[30]  G. Dohle,et al.  Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: A systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. , 2006, European urology.

[31]  Watt W Webb,et al.  Multiphoton microscopy of prostate and periprostatic neural tissue: a promising imaging technique for improving nerve-sparing prostatectomy. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[32]  A. Costello,et al.  Cadaveric analysis of periprostatic nerve distribution: an anatomical basis for high anterior release during radical prostatectomy? , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[33]  P. Babb,et al.  Patterns and trends in prostate cancer incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality. Part I: international comparisons , 2002, BJU international.

[34]  W. Steers,et al.  Fiberoptic imaging for urologic surgery , 2009, Current urology reports.

[35]  P. Walsh,et al.  Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[36]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[37]  W. Steers,et al.  Fiberoptic imaging of cavernous nerves in vivo. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[38]  M. Menon,et al.  Long-term survival probability in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: a case-control, propensity modeling study stratified by race, age, treatment and comorbidities. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[39]  Y. Kawanishi,et al.  Effect of radical retropubic prostatectomy on erectile function, evaluated before and after surgery using colour Doppler ultrasonography and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring , 2001, BJU international.

[40]  Kenneth W. Dunn,et al.  Principles of Multiphoton Microscopy , 2006, Nephron Experimental Nephrology.

[41]  M. Menon,et al.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. , 2009, European urology.

[42]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[43]  M. Pomper,et al.  Focal positive prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in ganglionic tissues associated with prostate neurovascular bundle: implications for novel intraoperative PSMA-based fluorescent imaging techniques. , 2013, Urologic oncology.

[44]  B. Laven,et al.  Early release of the neurovascular bundles and optical loupe magnification lead to improved and earlier return of potency following radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[45]  Junsung Choi,et al.  Newer imaging modalities to assess tumor in the prostate. , 2004, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[46]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. , 2008, Urology.

[47]  Ji Hyung Yu,et al.  Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2007, Urology.

[48]  P. Walsh,et al.  Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[49]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Tandem-robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to improve the neurovascular bundle visualization: a feasibility study. , 2011, Urology.

[50]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Origin and characterization of retrograde labeled neurons supplying the rat urethra using fiberoptic confocal fluorescent microscopy in vivo and immunohistochemistry. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[51]  W. Denk,et al.  Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Science.

[52]  I J Bigio,et al.  Spectroscopic diagnosis of bladder cancer with elastic light scattering , 1995, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[53]  J. Hotaling,et al.  Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: hemodynamic profiles and their correlation with the recovery of erectile function. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[54]  J. Stanford,et al.  General quality of life 2 years following treatment for prostate cancer: what influences outcomes? Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[56]  N Stone,et al.  Assessment of fiberoptic near-infrared raman spectroscopy for diagnosis of bladder and prostate cancer. , 2005, Urology.