Truncation and Angular-Scattering Corrections for Absorbing Aerosol in the TSI 3563 Nephelometer

The nephelometer, the primary instrument used for accurate in-situ scattering measurements, suffers from small errors due to truncation and angular nonidealities in the light source. Because that error depends on particle size, it has been traditionally estimated from the wavelength dependence of scattering, which also depends on particle size. Absorption by particles alters the scattering wavelength dependence, so the traditional correction is in error by 1–5% for absorbing particles, particularly when that absorption is wavelength-dependent. Single-scattering albedos under 0.9 and absorption Ångström exponents above 2 can have errors of over 2%. This problem will occur only very near sources, including laboratory measurements of combustion aerosol. For these situations, we suggest the correction should be calculated using Mie theory and an assumed refractive index, resulting in less than a 2% error. Scattering wavelength dependence for absorbing particles should not be used as a measurement of particle size.

[1]  J. Ogren,et al.  Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .

[2]  G. Leeuw,et al.  Angular Illumination and Truncation of Three Different Integrating Nephelometers: Implications for Empirical, Size-Based Corrections , 2009 .

[3]  Y. H. Zhang,et al.  AEROSOL OPTICAL PROPERTIES IN A RURAL ENVIRONMENT NEAR THE MEGA-CITY GUANGZHOU, CHINA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION, RADIATIVE FORCING AND REMOTE SENSING , 2008 .

[4]  Robert J. Charlson,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer , 1996 .

[5]  Tami C Bond,et al.  Emission factors and real-time optical properties of particles emitted from traditional wood burning cookstoves. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Beat Schmid,et al.  The Reno Aerosol Optics Study: An Evaluation of Aerosol Absorption Measurement Methods , 2005 .

[7]  Timothy S. Bates,et al.  Regional aerosol properties: Comparisons of boundary layer measurements from ACE 1, ACE 2, Aerosols99, INDOEX, ACE Asia, TARFOX, and NEAQS , 2005 .

[8]  M. Andreae,et al.  Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols , 2006 .

[9]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Color of brown carbon: A model for ultraviolet and visible light absorption by organic carbon aerosol , 2007 .

[10]  C. Linke,et al.  Strong spectral dependence of light absorption by organic carbon particles formed by propane combustion , 2006 .

[11]  Peter A. Crozier,et al.  Brown Carbon Spheres in East Asian Outflow and Their Optical Properties , 2008, Science.

[12]  J. Haywood,et al.  Aircraft measurements of biomass burning aerosol over West Africa during DABEX , 2008 .

[13]  P. Barber Absorption and scattering of light by small particles , 1984 .

[14]  Christian Mätzler,et al.  MATLAB Functions for Mie Scattering and Absorption , 2002 .

[15]  David J. Delene,et al.  Variability of Aerosol Optical Properties at Four North American Surface Monitoring Sites , 2002 .

[16]  D. Klockow,et al.  Spectroscopic Characterization of Humic-Like Substances in Airborne Particulate Matter , 1998 .

[17]  J. Haywood,et al.  The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget , 1995 .

[18]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols , 1999 .

[19]  H. Gadhavi,et al.  Single scattering albedo of aerosols over the central India: Implications for the regional aerosol radiative forcing , 2005 .

[20]  W. P. Arnott,et al.  Strong spectral variation of biomass smoke light absorption and single scattering albedo observed with a novel dual-wavelength photoacoustic instrument , 2008 .

[21]  Andrew J. Kean,et al.  Long-term changes in emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles , 2008 .

[22]  T. Eck,et al.  A review of biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass burning particles , 2004 .

[23]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Evidence that the spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon , 2004 .

[24]  Meinrat O. Andreae,et al.  Optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols , 2005 .

[25]  David S. Covert,et al.  Variability of aerosol optical properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE‐Asia , 2003 .

[26]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Monitoring of aerosol forcing of climate from space: analysis of measurement requirements , 2004, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer.

[27]  M. Schnaiter,et al.  Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers , 2003 .

[28]  B. Wehner,et al.  Absorption amplification of black carbon internally mixed with secondary organic aerosol , 2005 .