Who are Hard-to-Reach energy users? Segments, barriers and approaches to engage them.

Energy efficiency (EE) program administrators and policy makers have long encouraged the adoption of efficient technologies and conservation practices across all energy users and sectors. Energy users who haven’t yet participated in efficiency and conservation programs despite ongoing outreach are often referred to as “Hard-to-Reach” (HTR). These individuals or organizations can include, for instance, low income or rural audiences on the residential side and small businesses or building operators on the commercial side. More effectively engaging underserved and HTR audiences is key to ensuring everyone benefits equitably from efficiency and conservation interventions. In June 2019, energy efficiency, behavior change and HTR researchers, practitioners, and policy makers from five countries embarked on a 3-year project in partnership with the UserCentred Energy Systems Technology Collaboration Programme (Users TCP) by the International Energy Agency (IEA). The purpose of this effort is to characterize the diverse audience segments commonly referred to as HTR and to uncover the barriers and behavioral opportunities to more effectively engage them. This paper describes the first of these efforts. We have synthesized data from a global survey (N=110) and stakeholder interviews with 40+ energy efficiency experts striving to better understand and engage HTR in their respective countries. This paper provides initial insights from this data into how HTR energy users are defined across the world and which segments have been prioritized globally for focused outreach. The overarching goal is to use a standardized research process to inform and improve how energy efficiency, behavior change, and demand response programs targeting specific HTR audiences are designed, implemented and evaluated.

[1]  Margaret Samahita,et al.  Behavioural economics for energy and climate change policies and the transition to a sustainable energy use—A Scandinavian perspective , 2019 .

[2]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Factors influencing energy efficiency investments in existing Swedish residential buildings , 2010 .

[3]  Pär Blomkvist,et al.  Problem areas related to energy efficiency implementation in Swedish multifamily buildings , 2016 .

[4]  Lena Neij,et al.  Experiences in urban governance for sustainability: the Constructive Dialogue in Swedish municipalities , 2013 .

[5]  R. Chapman,et al.  Tackling cold housing and fuel poverty in New Zealand: A review of policies, research, and health impacts , 2012 .

[6]  Jonas Nässén,et al.  Determinants of greenhouse gas emissions from Swedish private consumption: Time-series and cross-sectional analyses , 2014 .

[7]  P. Howden-Chapman,et al.  Cool? Young people investigate living in cold housing and fuel poverty. A mixed methods action research study , 2016, SSM - population health.

[8]  Patrik Thollander,et al.  Barriers to and driving forces for energy efficiency in the non-energy intensive manufacturing industry in Sweden , 2006 .

[9]  John Holmberg,et al.  Energy efficiency--a forgotten goal in the Swedish building sector? , 2005 .

[10]  A. Ambrose,et al.  Reaching the 'Hardest to Reach' with energy advice: final report , 2019 .

[11]  Philippa Howden-Chapman,et al.  Making the connection: The relationship between fuel poverty, electricity disconnection, and prepayment metering , 2011 .

[12]  Dr Sea Rotmann How to Create a ‘ Magic Carpet ’ for Behaviour Change , 2016 .

[13]  Luis Mundaca,et al.  Towards a Green Energy Economy? A macroeconomic-climate evaluation of Sweden’s CO2 emissions , 2015 .

[14]  John Holmberg,et al.  Stagnating energy efficiency in the Swedish building sector—Economic and organisational explanations , 2008 .