Perceptions of the elderly on the use of wireless sensor networks for health monitoring

This study examines the perceptions and thoughts of the elderly community on current sensor network designs for health monitoring. The majority of research to date has focused on development of the wireless sensor network technology for health care applications; this study instead focuses on the perceptions of one group of users of such technology – the elderly. As user acceptance is a key issue in system deployment, issues and ideas arising from current sensor network designs are put to the elderly, aiming to involve them in the design process. By conducting focus group sessions with elderly participants and interviews with a health care professional, this study sought views on the nature of monitoring preferred by elderly people, and their preferred modes of interaction with such a system. Some interesting and surprising findings from these focus groups include a general preference for an embedded sensor implementation versus a wearable or ambient implementation, the expressed need of the elderly to have some ability to control / interact with the sensors and the general positive level of support for the idea of sensor-based health monitoring. Author

[1]  J. Barrett,et al.  Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  David A. Wagner,et al.  TinySec: a link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[3]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Perceptual Intelligence , 1999, HUC.

[4]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[5]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 1993, ECSCW.

[6]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  Random key-assignment for secure Wireless Sensor Networks , 2003, SASN '03.

[7]  Board on Human-Systems Integration Human Factors Research Needs for an Aging Population , 1990 .

[8]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Increasing the opportunities for aging in place , 2000, CUU '00.

[9]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Designing mediation for context-aware applications , 2005, TCHI.

[10]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[11]  Mary Jo Hatch,et al.  Physical Barriers, Task Characteristics, and Interaction Activity in Research and Development Firms , 1987 .

[12]  Virginia Z. Ogozalek A comparison of the use of text and multimedia interfaces to provide information to the elderly , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[13]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  CUHTec: the Centre for Usable Home Technology , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[14]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers , 2002, CHI.

[16]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  Design for privacy in multimedia computing and communications environments , 1997 .

[17]  Miwako Doi,et al.  LifeMinder: an evidence-based wearable healthcare assistant , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  M. Mikkonen,et al.  User and Concept Studies as Tools in Developing Mobile Communication Services for the Elderly , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[19]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors , 2005, TCHI.

[20]  Sara J. Czaja Human factors research needs for an aging population , 1990 .