Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product

Abstract. The role and the importance of soil moisture for meteorological, agricultural and hydrological applications is widely known. Remote sensing offers the unique capability to monitor soil moisture over large areas (catchment scale) with, nowadays, a temporal resolution suitable for hydrological purposes. However, the accuracy of the remotely sensed soil moisture estimates has to be carefully checked. The validation of these estimates with in-situ measurements is not straightforward due the well-known problems related to the spatial mismatch and the measurement accuracy. The analysis of the effects deriving from assimilating remotely sensed soil moisture data into hydrological or meteorological models could represent a more valuable method to test their reliability. In particular, the assimilation of satellite-derived soil moisture estimates into rainfall-runoff models at different scales and over different regions represents an important scientific and operational issue. In this study, the soil wetness index (SWI) product derived from the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) sensor onboard of the Metop satellite was tested. The SWI was firstly compared with the soil moisture temporal pattern derived from a continuous rainfall-runoff model (MISDc) to assess its relationship with modeled data. Then, by using a simple data assimilation technique, the linearly rescaled SWI that matches the range of variability of modelled data (denoted as SWI*) was assimilated into MISDc and the model performance on flood estimation was analyzed. Moreover, three synthetic experiments considering errors on rainfall, model parameters and initial soil wetness conditions were carried out. These experiments allowed to further investigate the SWI potential when uncertain conditions take place. The most significant flood events, which occurred in the period 2000–2009 on five subcatchments of the Upper Tiber River in central Italy, ranging in extension between 100 and 650 km2, were used as case studies. Results reveal that the SWI derived from the ASCAT sensor can be conveniently adopted to improve runoff prediction in the study area, mainly if the initial soil wetness conditions are unknown.

[1]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Runoff simulation sensitivity to remotely sensed initial soil water content , 1994 .

[2]  Maurice Borgeaud,et al.  A study of vegetation cover effects on ERS scatterometer data , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  W. Wagner,et al.  A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data , 1999 .

[4]  Maurice Borgeaud,et al.  Monitoring soil moisture over the Canadian Prairies with the ERS scatterometer , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Improvement of TOPLATS‐based discharge predictions through assimilation of ERS‐based remotely sensed soil moisture values , 2002, Hydrological Processes.

[6]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  The importance of the spatial patterns of remotely sensed soil moisture in the improvement of discharge predictions for small-scale basins through data assimilation , 2001 .

[7]  S. Le Hegarat-Mascle,et al.  Integration of remote sensing data into hydrological models for reservoir management , 2001 .

[8]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Integration of remote sensing data into hydrological models for reservoir management. Authors reply , 2002 .

[10]  Jennifer M. Jacobs,et al.  IMPROVED RAINFALL/RUNOFF ESTIMATES USING REMOTELY SENSED SOIL MOISTURE 1 , 2003 .

[11]  On The Relationship Between Runoff Coefficient And Catchment Initial Conditions , 2003 .

[12]  John F. Dowd,et al.  Runoff generation in relation to soil moisture patterns in a small Dartmoor catchment, Southwest England , 2003 .

[13]  P. Matgen,et al.  Predicting peak discharge through empirical relationships between rainfall, groundwater level and basin humidity in the Alzette River basin (Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg) , 2003 .

[14]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  Importance of soil moisture measurements for inferring parameters in hydrologic models of low-yielding ephemeral catchments , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  D. Aubert,et al.  Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 2003 .

[16]  Catherine Ottlé,et al.  Sequential Assimilation of ERS-1 SAR Data into a Coupled Land Surface–Hydrological Model Using an Extended Kalman Filter , 2003 .

[17]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: Role of initial conditions , 2004 .

[18]  F. Aires,et al.  Sensitivity of satellite microwave and infrared observations to soil moisture at a global scale: Relationship of satellite observations to in situ soil moisture measurements , 2005 .

[19]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Validation of ERS scatterometer‐derived soil moisture data in the central part of the Duero Basin, Spain , 2005 .

[20]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Assimilating scatterometer soil moisture data into conceptual hydrologic models at the regional scale , 2005 .

[21]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  The added value of spaceborne passive microwave soil moisture retrievals for forecasting rainfall‐runoff partitioning , 2005 .

[22]  Patrick Matgen,et al.  Assimilation of remotely sensed soil saturation levels in conceptual rainfall-runoff models , 2006 .

[23]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Evaluation of ERS scatterometer soil moisture products over a half‐degree region in southwestern France , 2006 .

[24]  M. Shao,et al.  Use of soil moisture data and curve number method for estimating runoff in the Loess Plateau of China , 2007 .

[25]  W. Wagner,et al.  Initial soil moisture retrievals from the METOP‐A Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) , 2007 .

[26]  François Anctil,et al.  Added gains of soil moisture content observations for streamflow predictions using neural networks , 2008 .

[27]  C. Albergel,et al.  An evaluation of ASCAT surface soil moisture products with in-situ observations in Southwestern France , 2008 .

[28]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  A new data assimilation approach for improving runoff prediction using remotely-sensed soil moisture retrievals , 2008 .

[29]  Qiang Zuo,et al.  Estimating the necessary sampling size of surface soil moisture at different scales using a random combination method , 2008 .

[30]  J. Vrugt,et al.  On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: A review , 2008 .

[31]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active/Passive Mission (SMAP) , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[32]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Matching ERS scatterometer based soil moisture patterns with simulations of a conceptual dual layer hydrologic model over Austria , 2008 .

[33]  Victor Koren,et al.  Use of soil moisture observations to improve parameter consistency in watershed calibration , 2008 .

[34]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Assimilation of a ERS scatterometer derived soil moisture index in the ECMWF numerical weather prediction system , 2008 .

[35]  Luca Brocca,et al.  On the estimation of antecedent wetness conditions in rainfall–runoff modelling , 2008 .

[36]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Scatterometer-Derived Soil Moisture Calibrated for Soil Texture With a One-Dimensional Water-Flow Model , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  V. Singh,et al.  Assimilation of Observed Soil Moisture Data in Storm Rainfall-Runoff Modeling , 2009 .

[38]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Soil moisture active and passive microwave products : intercomparison and evaluation over a Sahelian site , 2009 .

[39]  Richard de Jeu,et al.  Improving Curve Number Based Storm Runoff Estimates Using Soil Moisture Proxies , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[40]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  An Improved Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm for ERS and METOP Scatterometer Observations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[41]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Plot and field scale soil moisture dynamics and subsurface wetness control on runoff generation in a headwater in the Ore Mountains , 2009 .

[42]  W. Wagner,et al.  An Intercomparison of ERS-Scat and AMSR-E Soil Moisture Observations with Model Simulations over France , 2009 .

[43]  Pilar Llorens,et al.  The Hydrology of Mediterranean Mountain Areas , 2009 .

[44]  Vazken Andréassian,et al.  How crucial is it to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments , 2009 .

[45]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Antecedent Wetness Conditions based on ERS scatterometer data in support to rainfall-runoff modeling , 2009 .

[46]  G. Pegram,et al.  A comparison of ASCAT and modelled soil moisture over South Africa, using TOPKAPI in land surface mode. , 2009 .

[47]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A regional analysis of event runoff coefficients with respect to climate and catchment characteristics in Austria , 2009 .

[48]  Luca Brocca,et al.  A continuous rainfall-runoff model derived from investigations in a small experimental basin , 2010 .

[49]  Use of ASCAT derived soil moisture product for real-time flood forecasting in the Upper Tiber River , 2010 .

[50]  Yves Tramblay,et al.  Assessment of initial soil moisture conditions for event-based rainfall–runoff modelling , 2010 .

[51]  Luca Brocca,et al.  ASCAT soil wetness index validation through in situ and modeled soil moisture data in central Italy , 2010 .

[52]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Soil moisture variations monitoring by AMSU-based soil wetness indices: A long-term inter-comparison with ground measurements , 2010 .

[53]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Distributed rainfall‐runoff modelling for flood frequency estimation and flood forecasting , 2011 .

[54]  Peter S. Maybeck,et al.  Stochastic Models, Estimation And Control , 2012 .