Identification of forgeries in historical enamels by combining the non-destructive scanning XRF imaging and alpha-PIXE portable techniques

Abstract Particle induced X-ray emission performed with alpha particles (alpha-PIXE) and scanning X-ray fluorescence (XRF) imaging have been used for the non-invasive investigation of three enameled artworks dated back to the XI–XII century AD. The attribution of the three objects has been performed based on art historical considerations even if an analytical investigation was never applied to confirm their authenticity. The alpha-PIXE technique allowed to determine the compositional pattern of the glass matrix in the three artworks; the XRF imaging performed by scanning the sample surface allowed to obtain the signature of opacifying and coloring agents. The high concentration values of Pb in the glass matrix as well as the extensive use of chemical components based on Cr, Zn, and As, questioned the authenticity of the three artworks and postponed their manufacturing dating from the XVIII century AD. The application of a matrix factorization analysis to the XRF data allowed highlighting the chemical associations among Cd, Se, Ba and Zn, indicating the use of a modern cadmium lithopone in the red decorations. The analytical results obtained during the investigation suggest a classification of the three objects as modern copies.

[1]  G. Pappalardo,et al.  The new PIXE‐alpha spectrometer for the analysis of Roman nummi surfaces , 2013 .

[2]  D. Sokaras,et al.  A deep view in cultural heritage—confocal micro X-ray spectroscopy for depth resolved elemental analysis , 2012 .

[3]  P. Colomban The Destructive/Non-Destructive Identification of Enameled Pottery, Glass Artifacts and Associated Pigments—A Brief Overview , 2013 .

[4]  Philip J. Potts,et al.  Portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometry : capabilities for in situ analysis , 2008 .

[5]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[6]  Paul Craddock,et al.  Scientific investigation of copies, fakes and forgeries , 2009 .

[7]  L. Napolitano Materials , 1984, Science.

[8]  V. A. Solé,et al.  A multiplatform code for the analysis of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra , 2007 .

[9]  Ž. Šmit,et al.  Analysis of early medieval glass beads – Glass in the transition period , 2012 .

[10]  J. Benton Materials, Methods, and Masterpieces of Medieval Art , 2009 .

[11]  L. Pappalardo,et al.  The Improved Lns Pixe-Alpha Portable System: Archaeometric Applications* , 2003 .

[12]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[13]  Daniel Grötzsch,et al.  A compact 3D micro X-ray fluorescence spectrometer with X-ray tube excitation for archaeometric applications , 2010 .

[14]  N. Masini,et al.  The compositional and mineralogical analysis of fired pigments in Nasca pottery from Cahuachi (Peru) by the combined use of the portable PIXE-alpha and portable XRD techniques , 2011 .

[15]  P. Colomban,et al.  On‐site analysis of Limoges enamels from sixteenth to nineteenth centuries: an attempt to differentiate between genuine artefacts and copies , 2010 .

[16]  J. Boeyens,et al.  Raman signatures of the modern pigment (Zn,Cd)S1−xSex and glass matrix of a red bead from Magoro Hill, an archaeological site in Limpopo Province, South Africa, recalibrate the settlement chronology , 2012 .

[17]  Paola Ricciardi,et al.  Nondestructive on‐site identification of ancient glasses: genuine artefacts, embellished pieces or forgeries? , 2009 .

[18]  Koen Janssens,et al.  A mobile instrument for in situ scanning macro-XRF investigation of historical paintings , 2013 .

[19]  I. Biron,et al.  Colouring, Decolouring and Opacifying of Glass , 2013 .

[20]  Theodore L Hopman,et al.  Extension of gupix to 2H, 3He and 4He excitation , 2002 .

[21]  K. Janssens Modern Methods for Analysing Archaeological and Historical Glass: Janssens/Modern , 2013 .

[22]  Nicholas Eastaugh,et al.  The pigment compendium , 2004 .

[23]  Koen Janssens,et al.  Recent trends in quantitative aspects of microscopic X-ray fluorescence analysis , 2010 .