Structural integrity analysis of axially cracked pipelines using conventional and constraint-modified failure assessment diagrams

This study explores applications of the failure assessment diagram (FAD) methodology to predict the failure behaviour for high pressure pipelines with planar defects having different geometries (i.e., crack depth and crack length). One purpose of this investigation is to assess the capability of FAD procedures in integrity analyses of high pressure pipelines with varying crack configurations. Another purpose is to address the effectiveness of constraint-based FADs to predict burst pressure of low-constraint cracked pipelines. Full scale burst testing of end-capped pipe specimens with axial surface flaws provide the data needed to compare the failure predictions derived from the FAD procedures. The analyses reveal that the degree of agreement between predicted pressures and experimentally measured values depends rather markedly on the crack size for the tested pipes. Moreover, the analyses also show a possible weak dependence of the predicted pressures on the constraint-based correction scheme. Overall, the results validate the use of FAD-based methodologies for defect assessments of axially cracked pipelines.

[1]  Api Standard,et al.  Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities , 2006 .

[2]  Stanley T. Rolfe,et al.  Effects of crack depth on elastic-plastic fracture toughness , 1991 .

[3]  C. Shih,et al.  Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—II. Fracture applications , 1992 .

[4]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Numerical investigation of 3-D constraint effects on brittle fracture in SE(B) and C(T) specimens , 1996 .

[5]  Claudio Ruggieri,et al.  A transferability model for brittle fracture including constraint and ductile tearing effects: a probabilistic approach , 1996 .

[6]  Noel P. O’Dowd,et al.  Constraint in the failure assessment diagram approach for fracture assessment , 1995 .

[7]  Claudio Ruggieri,et al.  Correlation of fracture behavior in high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using constraint designed test specimens––Part I: Plane-strain analyses , 2005 .

[8]  H. S. Wu,et al.  Assessment for integrity of structures containing defects , 1998 .

[9]  Arne S. Gullerud,et al.  WARP3D-Release 10.8: Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Solids using a Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Software Architecture , 1998 .

[10]  C.H.A. Townley,et al.  The effect of defects on structural failure: A two-criteria approach , 1975 .

[11]  C. Shih,et al.  Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—I. Structure of fields , 1991 .

[12]  William T. Becker,et al.  Failure analysis and prevention , 2002 .

[13]  A. G. Miller,et al.  Review of limit loads of structures containing defects , 1988 .

[14]  M. R. Goldthorpe,et al.  The Effect of Temperature and Specimen Geometry on the Parameters of the "Local Approach" to Cleavage Fracture , 1996 .

[15]  E. S. Folias An axial crack in a pressurized cylindrical shell , 1965 .

[16]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Continuum and micromechanics treatment of constraint in fracture , 1993, International Journal of Fracture.

[17]  Robert A. Ainsworth A constraint-based failure assessment diagram for fracture assessment , 1995 .

[18]  E. S. Folias A finite line crack in a pressurized spherical shell , 1965 .