Enlightened trial and error.

Human-computer interaction as a rationalistic, engineering discipline has been taught successfully for more than 25 years. The established narrative is one of designing usable systems for users, some of whom have been described as “naive”, safely installed behind their desktop personal computers. But the world is changed. All aspects of society use interactive technology, it is frequently carried about with us, we talk to it, gesture at it, caress it and check it compulsively. The original emphasis on designing for usability has given way to creating an optimal “user experience”. So we are faced with two distinct but related issues: firstly, how do we characterise this new technology and our relationship with it and secondly, how do we teach to design for it. We have developed an approach, which might formally be described as being based on a “convergent-divergent dialectic” but is, at its heart, recognisably playful.

[1]  Phil Turner,et al.  Towards an account of intuitiveness , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Mark Weiser,et al.  The computer for the 21st Century , 1991, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[3]  Dan Saffer,et al.  Designing for Interaction: Creating Smart Applications and Clever Devices , 2006 .

[4]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[5]  Lauralee Alben,et al.  Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design , 1996, INTR.

[6]  A. Shepherd,et al.  Guide to Task Analysis , 2003 .

[7]  SutcliffeAlistair,et al.  Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality , 2008 .

[8]  Denise Silver,et al.  Joint Application Development , 1995 .

[9]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction , 1997, Formal Approaches to Computing and Information Technology (FACIT).

[10]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[11]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[12]  R. Coyne Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age , 1995 .

[13]  Ann M. Bisantz,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis , 2013 .

[14]  Martin Ludvigsen,et al.  Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[15]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[16]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  Formal methods in human-computer interaction , 1990 .

[17]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[18]  F. Biocca,et al.  Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked MindsMeasure of Social Presence , 2004 .

[19]  Phil Turner,et al.  Emotional and aesthetic attachment to digital artefacts , 2013, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[20]  Ken Eason,et al.  Information technology and organisational change , 1988 .

[21]  Sus Lundgren,et al.  Teaching aesthetics in interaction design: attempt one , 2009 .

[22]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[23]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  M. Gardiner,et al.  Applying cognitive psychology to user-interface design , 1987 .

[25]  S. Payne A descriptive study of mental models , 1991 .

[26]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[27]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotional design , 2004, UBIQ.

[28]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[29]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality , 2008, TCHI.

[30]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[31]  Gerd Szwillus,et al.  Mensch & Computer 2003 , 2003 .

[32]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation: which technique? , 1996, TCHI.

[33]  Jennifer L. Gregg,et al.  The Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence : Pilot Test of the Factor Structure and Concurrent Validity , 2001 .

[34]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[35]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Funology:From Usability to Enjoyment , 2003 .

[36]  Richard L. Edwards,et al.  Extending knowledge domains for new media education: integrating interaction design theory and methods , 2010, New Media Soc..

[37]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[38]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Human-computer interaction: psychology as a science of design , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[39]  F. Biocca,et al.  Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked Minds Social Presence Measure , 2006 .

[40]  Michael Burmester,et al.  AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität , 2003, MuC.

[41]  Steve Benford,et al.  From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences , 2009, CHI.

[42]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[43]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene , 1995 .

[44]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Perspectives on Systems Design , 1993 .

[45]  Alfonso Fuggetta Panel Presentation , 1991, ESEC.

[46]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Computer systems in work design--the ETHICS method : effective technical and human implementation of computer systems , 1979 .

[47]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[48]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  From Human Factors to Human Actors , 2007 .

[49]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[50]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Interaction criticism: three readings of an interaction design, and what they get us , 2010, INTR.

[51]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Shifting viewpoints: Artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction , 2006, Artif. Intell..

[52]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[53]  K. F. H. Murrell,et al.  Ergonomics: Man in His Working Environment , 1965 .

[54]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  User-centered System Design , 2011 .

[55]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide To Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group , 1992 .

[56]  William L. Bewley,et al.  Human factors testing in the design of Xerox's 8010 “Star” office workstation , 1983, CHI '83.

[57]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering: New Wine in New Bottles , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..