Achieving Bloom's Two-Sigma Goal Using Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Management education is engaged in significant programmatic reforms in response to the business community’s call for web-savvy, problem-solving graduates. Webbased intelligent tutors provide a readily accessible vehicle for enhancing business students’ learning performance as well as preparing them for the rigors of the global marketplace. A primary goal of these AI-based systems is to approach Bloom’s two-sigma learning performance standard via mastery learning techniques. Furthermore, intelligent tutors can also be used to identify students at risk, to formulate appropriate intervention plans, and to support team learning. Recent evidence suggests that achieving Bloom’s goal may be achievable on a routine basis by 2025. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the growing potential for using intelligent tutors to enhance student and team learning opportunities and outcomes and to outline strategies for implementing this revolutionary process throughout the management education community of practice. Achieving Bloom’s TwoSigma Goal Using Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Application to Management Education

[1]  Jun Xu,et al.  A problem solving oriented intelligent tutoring system to improve students' acquisition of basic computer skills , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[2]  S. Sawilowsky New Effect Size Rules of Thumb , 2009 .

[3]  Edgar A. Maldonado,et al.  Data mining student choices: A new approach to business curriculum planning , 2018 .

[4]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2016 .

[5]  P. Ghemawat Strategies for Higher Education in the Digital Age , 2017 .

[6]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Authoring Tools for Collaborative Intelligent Tutoring System Environments , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[7]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Peer Tutoring-Based Concept Mapping Approach to Improving Students' Learning Achievements and Attitudes for a Social Studies Course , 2018, Int. J. Online Pedagog. Course Des..

[8]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[9]  Mehrnaz Fahimirad,et al.  A Review on Application of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning in Educational Contexts , 2018, International Journal of Learning and Development.

[10]  Robert D. Costigan,et al.  Another perspective on MBA program alignment: An investigation of learning goals , 2014 .

[11]  Angèle Beausoleil Revisiting Rogers: the diffusion of his innovation development process as a normative framework for innovation managers, students and scholars , 2019, Journal of Innovation Management.

[12]  N. Beyrouti Digital Technology Management and Educational Innovation: The Marketabilityand Employability of The Higher Education Degrees , 2017 .

[13]  John F. Pane,et al.  Translating Standardized Effects of Education Programs Into More Interpretable Metrics , 2019, Educational Researcher.

[14]  Michael Flavin Technology-enhanced learning and higher education , 2016 .

[15]  Michael C. Dorneich,et al.  The Challenges of Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Teams , 2016 .

[16]  Wahidah Husain,et al.  A Review on Predicting Student's Performance Using Data Mining Techniques , 2015 .

[17]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Learning with intelligent tutors and worked examples: selecting learning activities adaptively leads to better learning outcomes than a fixed curriculum , 2016, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[18]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Detecting students-at-risk in computer programming classes with learning analytics from students’ digital footprints , 2019, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[19]  Psychological Shift in Partners of People with Multiple Sclerosis Who Undertake Lifestyle Modification: An Interpretive Phenomenological Study , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[20]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Authoring Tools for Designing Intelligent Tutoring Systems: a Systematic Review of the Literature , 2017, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[21]  Chih-Hung Hsieh,et al.  Business schools in crisis , 2016 .

[22]  Mehri Mohammad Bagheri Intelligent and Adaptive Tutoring Systems: How to Integrate Learners , 2015 .

[23]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis , 2014 .

[24]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: the one hundred year study on artificial intelligence , 2016 .

[25]  W. Jacob,et al.  Professional development programmes at world-class universities , 2015, Palgrave Communications.

[26]  Ido Roll,et al.  Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[27]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Stupid Tutoring Systems, Intelligent Humans , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[28]  Glenda A. Gunter,et al.  Leveraging Multitasking Opportunities to Increase Motivation and Engagement in Online Classrooms: An Action Research Case Study , 2014, Int. J. Online Pedagog. Course Des..

[29]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief , 2012 .

[31]  Heather A. Priest,et al.  Current Trends in Adaptive Training With Military Applications: An Introduction , 2012 .

[32]  Janice K. Winch,et al.  Improving Student Performance in a Management Science Course With Supplemental Tutorial Videos , 2015 .

[33]  H. Cooper,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students' academic learning , 2014 .

[34]  Reyes Juárez-Ramírez,et al.  Evaluation module based on Bayesian networks to Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[35]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Example-Tracing Tutors: Intelligent Tutor Development for Non-programmers , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[37]  Dan V. Caprar,et al.  Virtual Teams and International Business Teaching and Learning: The Case of the Global Enterprise Experience (GEE) , 2014 .

[38]  Matthew D. Pistilli,et al.  Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success , 2012, LAK.

[39]  Wayne Zachary,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring for Team Training: Lessons Learned from US Military Research , 2018, Research on Managing Groups and Teams.

[40]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Developing an early-warning system for spotting at-risk students by using eBook interaction logs , 2019, Smart Learning Environments.

[41]  Nicole L. Weber,et al.  Horizon Report2019 Higher Education Edition , 2019 .

[42]  Lee Shinaberger Components of a Flipped Classroom Influencing Student Success in an Undergraduate Business Statistics Course , 2017 .

[43]  K. Watty,et al.  Formative Feedback through Summative Tutorial-based Assessments: The Relationship to Student Performance , 2014 .

[44]  Reyes Juárez-Ramírez,et al.  Integrating affective learning into intelligent tutoring systems , 2017, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[45]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Integrating representation learning and skill learning in a human-like intelligent agent , 2015, Artif. Intell..

[46]  Vasile Rus,et al.  DeepTutor: An Effective, Online Intelligent Tutoring System That Promotes Deep Learning , 2015, AAAI.

[47]  Antonio Bartolomé,et al.  Personal Learning Environments : A study among Higher Education students ’ designs , 2017 .

[48]  David Bevan,et al.  Experiential learning and management education , 2012 .

[49]  Ilana Stonebraker,et al.  Student See Versus Student Do: A Comparative Study of Two Online Tutorials , 2016 .

[50]  C. Ferguson An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. , 2009 .

[51]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Animated Agents for Procedural Training in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[52]  Undergraduate Business Education: It's Time to Think Outside the Box , 2013 .

[53]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[54]  Jugal K. Kalita,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Comprehensive Historical Survey with Recent Developments , 2018, International Journal of Computer Applications.

[55]  Ana González-Marcos,et al.  Student evaluation of a virtual experience for project management learning: An empirical study for learning improvement , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Hsun-Ming Lee,et al.  E-Mentoring Through a Network of Practice on Facebook , 2015, Int. J. Knowl. Based Organ..

[57]  A. Brew,et al.  Achieving sustainability in learning and teaching initiatives , 2014 .

[58]  Adetokunbo A. A. Adenowo,et al.  A Metamodel for Designing an Intelligent Tutoring Systems Authoring Tool , 2014, Comput. Inf. Sci..

[59]  Ashutosh Modi,et al.  Domain Authoring Assistant for Intelligent Virtual Agent , 2019, AAMAS.

[60]  Chai-Lee Goi,et al.  The use of business simulation games in teaching and learning , 2018, Journal of Education for Business.

[61]  Thomas T. Hills Crowdsourcing content creation in the classroom , 2015, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[62]  Adrian Simpson,et al.  The misdirection of public policy: comparing and combining standardised effect sizes , 2017 .

[63]  David E. Stout,et al.  Focusing accounting curricula on students' long-run careers: recommendations for an integrated competency-based framework for accounting education , 2014 .

[64]  Fahri Karakaş,et al.  Management Learning at the Speed of Life: Designing Reflective, Creative, and Collaborative Spaces for Millenials , 2015 .

[65]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Designing Adaptive Instruction for Teams: a Meta-Analysis , 2018, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[66]  Indira N. Z. Day,et al.  A review of the characteristics of intermediate assessment and their relationship with student grades , 2018 .

[67]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Learning through mobile devices: leveraging affordances as facilitators of engagement , 2019, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[68]  Sanjay Mohapatra,et al.  Business school education and technology–a case study , 2013, Education and Information Technologies.

[69]  J. Meehan,et al.  The business case and barriers for responsible management education in business schools , 2015 .

[70]  T. Guskey Closing Achievement Gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom's “Learning for Mastery” , 2007 .

[71]  Dašić Predrag,et al.  A REVIEW OF INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS IN E-LEARNING , 2016 .

[72]  John F. Pane,et al.  The role of mastery learning in an intelligent tutoring system: Principal stratification on a latent variable , 2017, The Annals of Applied Statistics.

[73]  Dheeraj Raju,et al.  Comparing Data Mining Models in Academic Analytics , 2016, Int. J. Knowl. Based Organ..

[74]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  The development of a decision support system for mobile learning: a case study in Taiwan , 2016 .

[75]  Angélica de Antonio Jiménez,et al.  Applying a student modeling with non-monotonic diagnosis to Intelligent Virtual Environment for Training/Instruction , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[76]  M. Buil,et al.  An Explanatory Study of MBA Students with Regards to Sustainability and Ethics Commitment , 2016 .

[77]  Baharuddin Aris,et al.  Enhancing Student's Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) through the Socratic Method Approach with Technology , 2016, Int. J. Knowl. Based Organ..

[78]  R. Slavin,et al.  How Methodological Features Affect Effect Sizes in Education , 2016 .

[79]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Strategic Capability-Learning for Improved Multiagent Collaboration in Ad Hoc Environments , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[80]  C. Hsiung,et al.  The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning , 2012 .