Clinical evaluation of indium-111-labeled chimeric anti-CEA monoclonal antibody.

UNLABELLED Chimeric T84.66 (cT84.66) is a high-affinity (1.16 x 10[11] M[-1]) IgG1 monoclonal antibody (MAb) against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). This pilot trial evaluated the tumor-targeting properties, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of 111In-labeled cT84.66. METHODS Patients with CEA-producing metastatic malignancies were administered a single intravenous dose of 5 mCi 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-cT84.66. Serial blood samples, 24-hr urine collections and nuclear images were collected up to 7 days postinfusion. Human antichimeric antibody response was assessed up to 6 mo postinfusion. RESULTS Imaging of at least one known tumor site was observed in 14 of 15 (93%) patients. Seventy-four lesions were analyzed with an imaging sensitivity rate of 45.1% and a positive predictive value of 94.1%. In one patient, two additional bone metastases developed within 6 mo of antibody administration at sites initially felt to be falsely positive on scan. One patient developed a human antichimeric antibody response predominantly to the murine portion of the antibody. The antibody cleared serum with a median T(1/2alpha) of 6.53 hr and a T(1/2beta) of 90.87 hr. Interpatient variations in serum clearance rates were observed and were secondary to differences in clearance and metabolic rates of antibody-antigen complexes by the liver. One patient demonstrated very rapid clearance of antibody by the liver, which compromised antibody localization to the primary tumor. Antibody uptake in primary and metastatic tumors ranged from 0.5% to 10.5% injected dose/kg, resulting in estimated radiation doses ranging from 0.97 to 21.3 cGy/mCi 90Y. Antibody uptake in regional lymph nodes ranged from 1.3% to 377% injected dose/kg, resulting in estimated radiation doses ranging from 2.0 to 617 cGy/mCi 90Y. CONCLUSION Chimeric T84.66 demonstrated tumor targeting that was comparable to that of other radiolabeled intact anti-CEA Mabs. Its immunogenicity after single administration was lower than murine Mabs. These properties make cT84.66 or a lower molecular weight derivative attractive for further evaluation as an imaging agent. These same properties also make it appropriate for future evaluation in Phase I therapy trials. Finally, a wide variation in the rate of antibody clearance was observed, with one patient demonstrating very slow clearance, resulting in the highest estimated marrow dose of the group, and one patient demonstrating unusually rapid clearance, resulting in poor antibody localization to tumor. Data from this study suggest that serum CEA levels, antibody-antigen complex clearance and, therefore, antibody clearance are influenced by both the production and clearance rates of CEA. This underscores the need to further identify, characterize and understand those factors that influence the biodistribution and clearance of radiolabeled anti-CEA antibodies to allow for better selection of patients for therapy and rational planning of radioimmunotherapy.

[1]  H. Hansen,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. A laboratory adjunct in the diagnosis and management of cancer. , 1974, Human pathology.

[2]  C. Wagener,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies for carcinoembryonic antigen and related antigens as a model system: a systematic approach for the determination of epitope specificities of monoclonal antibodies. , 1983, Journal of immunology.

[3]  C. Wagener,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies for carcinoembryonic antigen and related antigens as a model system: determination of affinities and specificities of monoclonal antibodies by using biotin-labeled antibodies and avidin as precipitating agent in a solution phase immunoassay. , 1983, Journal of immunology.

[4]  K. Foon,et al.  Human anti-murine immunoglobulin responses in patients receiving monoclonal antibody therapy. , 1985, Cancer research.

[5]  A. Epenetos Antibody guided lymphangiography in the staging of cervical cancer. , 1985, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  R. W. Baldwin,et al.  The characteristics of blood-borne radiolabels and the effect of anti-mouse IgG antibodies on localization of radiolabeled monoclonal antibody in cancer patients. , 1985, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  M. Larché,et al.  Development of primary and secondary immune responses to mouse monoclonal antibodies used in the diagnosis and therapy of malignant neoplasms. , 1986, Cancer research.

[8]  R. Paxton,et al.  Preoperative imaging of colorectal carcinoma with 111In-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody. , 1986, Cancer research.

[9]  C. Higano,et al.  Colorectal carcinoma: detection with indium-111 anticarcinoembryonic-antigen monoclonal antibody ZCE-025. , 1987, Radiology.

[10]  J. Schlom,et al.  Purification and composition of the human tumor-associated glycoprotein (TAG-72) defined by monoclonal antibodies CC49 and B72.3. , 1988, Cancer research.

[11]  R. Paxton,et al.  Tumor uptake as a function of tumor mass: a mathematic model. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  J. Murray,et al.  Improved tumor localization with increasing dose of indium-111-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody ZCE-025 in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J. Ghrayeb,et al.  Mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody in man: kinetics and immune response. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Paxton,et al.  Effect of specific antibody pretreatment on liver uptake of 111In-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody in nude mice bearing human colon cancer xenografts. , 1989, Cancer research.

[15]  S. Stroupe,et al.  An optimized antibody-chelator conjugate for imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen with indium-111. , 1990, International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Paxton,et al.  Estimation of monoclonal antibody-associated 90Y activity needed to achieve certain tumor radiation doses in colorectal cancer patients. , 1990, Cancer research.

[17]  A. Riggs,et al.  Cloning of the genes for T84.66, an antibody that has a high specificity and affinity for carcinoembryonic antigen, and expression of chimeric human/mouse T84.66 genes in myeloma and Chinese hamster ovary cells. , 1990, Cancer research.

[18]  J. Ajani,et al.  Imaging with indium111-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody ZCE-025 of recurrent colorectal or carcinoembryonic antigen-producing cancer in patients with rising serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels and occult metastases. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Beatty,et al.  Comparison of immunoscintigraphy and computerized tomography in identifying colorectal cancer: individual lesion analysis. , 1991, Cancer research.

[20]  J. Beatty,et al.  Intraoperative gamma detection probe with presurgical antibody imaging in colon cancer. , 1991, Archives of surgery.

[21]  A. Delaloye,et al.  Diagnostic Applications and Therapeutic Approaches with Different Preparations of Anti-CEA Antibodies , 1992, The International journal of biological markers.

[22]  R. V. Van Heertum,et al.  Colorectal cancer imaging with iodine-123-labeled CEA monoclonal antibody fragments. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  A. Maraveyas,et al.  Asbestos fibers in the colonic wall. , 1974, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma with [131I]anti-B1 (anti-CD20) antibody. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Chen-feng Qi,et al.  Definition of the expression of the human carcinoembryonic antigen and non‐specific cross‐reacting antigen in human breast and lung carcinomas , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[26]  J. Wong,et al.  A method including edge effects for the estimation of radioimmunotherapy absorbed doses in the tumor xenograft model. , 1994, Medical physics.

[27]  J. Simpson,et al.  Prognostic relevance of carcinoembryonic antigen and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients , 1994, Cancer.

[28]  J. Ryser,et al.  Radiolabeled chimeric anti-CEA monoclonal antibody compared with the original mouse monoclonal antibody for surgically treated colorectal carcinoma. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  M. Schrappe,et al.  A phase I study of human/mouse chimeric antiganglioside GD2 antibody ch14.18 in patients with neuroblastoma. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[30]  J M Esteban,et al.  Initial experience evaluating 90yttrium-radiolabeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen chimeric T84.66 in a phase I radioimmunotherapy trial. , 1995, Cancer research.

[31]  G. Curt,et al.  Phase I trial of iodine 131-labeled COL-1 in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: influence of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and tumor bulk on pharmacokinetics. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  M G Stabin,et al.  MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.