Clinical, radiological and patient-reported outcomes in intra-articular calcaneal fractures: Comparison of conservative and surgical treatment.

OBJECTIVES This study aims to compare the radiological, clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients with intra-articular calcaneus fractures treated conservatively or surgically. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-four patients (30 males, 24 females; mean age 41.0 years; range, 18 to 73 years) treated due to calcaneus fracture were included in the study. Twenty-nine patients underwent conservative treatment (group 1) and 25 patients underwent surgical treatment (group 2). The fractures were classified according to Sanders. At the final follow-up, patients' Bohler's angle, The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score and Foot Function Index (FFI) were used to evaluate their radiological, clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Postoperative complications were also noted. RESULTS The fracture was at the right foot in 28 patients and the left foot in 26 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 41.1±23.2 months (range, 24 to 126 months). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of gender, fracture side, mean age, or follow-up duration (p=0.951, p=0.571, p=0.326, and p=0.620, respectively). According to Sanders classification, 18 patients were type 2 and 11 patients were type 3 in group 1, while 11 patients were type 2 and 14 patients were type 3 in group 2. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the type of the fracture (p=0.184). On the other hand, the outcomes were significantly better for group 2 compared to group 1 in terms of the Bohler's angle, AOFAS and FFI scores (p=0.004, p=0.003 and p=0.006, respectively). In group 1, subtalar arthritis developed in three patients. In group 2, wound healing problems and superficial infection developed in three patients, while subtalar arthritis developed in two patients. CONCLUSION Surgical treatment is more effective in intra-articular calcaneus fractures compared to conservative treatment according to clinical, radiological and patient-reported outcomes. In addition, wound problems should be considered in surgical management.

[1]  O. Atik.  Which articles do we prefer to publish? , 2018, Eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = Joint diseases & related surgery.

[2]  Sharad Prabhakar,et al.  Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures: a current concepts review , 2017, SICOT-J.

[3]  P. Patil,et al.  Plating for intra-articular calcaneal fractures…. Is it an overkill? , 2015, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[4]  M. Verhofstad,et al.  Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a comparison among open, percutaneous, and nonoperative treatment. , 2014, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[5]  M. Amin,et al.  Operative treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of Calcaneum: Is it worthwhile? , 2014, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[6]  J. Luitse,et al.  Long-term outcomes of 1,730 calcaneal fractures: systematic review of the literature. , 2013, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[7]  C. Şen,et al.  Mid-term results of calcaneal plating for displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures. , 2013, Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES.

[8]  J. Bruce,et al.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  J. Halm,et al.  The fate of Böhler’s angle in conservatively-treated displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[10]  D. Makki,et al.  Osteosynthesis of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum: a long-term review of 47 cases. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials. , 2009, British medical bulletin.

[12]  T. Ibrahim,et al.  Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. , 2007, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[13]  Wang Qiong-er.  Operative treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures , 2006 .

[14]  J. Kennedy,et al.  An outcomes assessment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures, using patient and physician's assessment profiles. , 2003, Injury.

[15]  R. Buckley,et al.  Complications Following Management of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Open Reduction Internal Fixation With Nonoperative Management , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[16]  S. G. Agnew.  Calcaneal fractures: operative versus nonoperative treatment. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  D. Thordarson,et al.  Operative vs. Nonoperative Treatment of Intra-Articular Fractures of the Calcaneus: A Prospective Randomized Trial , 1996, Foot & ankle international.

[18]  T. Rüedi,et al.  Ten-year follow-up after operative treatment for intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  R. Sanders,et al.  Operative Treatment in 120 Displaced Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures Results Using a Prognostic Computed Tomography Scan Classification , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  K. Roach,et al.  The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  M. Sugi,et al.  A new method of manual reduction for intra-articular fracture of the calcaneus. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.