Contemporaneous notes for digital forensic examinations

[1]  Graeme Horsman,et al.  Framework for Reliable Experimental Design (FRED): A research framework to ensure the dependable interpretation of digital data for digital forensics , 2018, Comput. Secur..

[2]  A. Gregory,et al.  A Comparison of US Police Interviewers' Notes with their Subsequent Reports , 2011 .

[3]  Glenn Langenburg,et al.  Addressing potential observer effects in forensic science: a perspective from a forensic scientist who uses linear sequential unmasking techniques* , 2017 .

[4]  Itiel E. Dror,et al.  Cognitive and human factors in digital forensics: Problems, challenges, and the way forward , 2019, Digit. Investig..

[5]  Tim Watson,et al.  Quality standards for digital forensics: Learning from experience in England & Wales , 2020, Digit. Investig..

[6]  Dan Krane,et al.  Letter to the Editor— Context Management Toolbox: A Linear Sequential Unmasking (LSU) Approach for Minimizing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decision Making , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  Graeme Horsman,et al.  Part 2: The Phase-oriented Advice and Review Structure (PARS) for digital forensic investigations , 2020, Digit. Investig..

[8]  E. J. van Eijk,et al.  Digital forensics as a service: Stepping up the game , 2020, Digit. Investig..

[9]  J. Gerwing,et al.  ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF ENGLISH-ASA-SECOND-LANGUAGE EYEWITNESS TESTIMONIES AND CONTEMPORANEOUS OFFICER NOTES USING TWO METHODS , 2017 .

[10]  Gregg H. Gunsch,et al.  An Examination of Digital Forensic Models , 2002, Int. J. Digit. EVid..

[11]  Graeme Horsman,et al.  Part 1: The need for peer review in digital forensics , 2020, Digit. Investig..

[12]  Graeme Horsman,et al.  Formalising investigative decision making in digital forensics: Proposing the Digital Evidence Reporting and Decision Support (DERDS) framework , 2019, Digit. Investig..