Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia

People with agrammatic aphasia often experience greater difficulty comprehending passive compared to active sentences. The Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH; Grodzinsky, 2000) proposes that aphasic individuals cannot generate accurate syntactic representations of passive sentences and, hence, use an agent-first processing strategy which leads to at-chance performance. We tested this claim using the eyetracking-while-listening paradigm in order to reveal online processing routines. Ten agrammatic aphasic participants and 10 age-matched controls listened to passive and active sentences and performed a sentence-picture matching task (i.e., selecting between two pictures with reversed thematic roles), while their eye movements were monitored. Control participants' performance was at ceiling, whereas accuracy for the aphasic participants was above chance for active sentences and at chance for passive sentences. Further, for the control participants, the eye movement data showed an initial agent-first processing bias, followed by fixation on the correct picture in the vicinity of the verb in both active and passive sentences. However, the aphasic participants showed no evidence of agent-first processing, counter the predictions of the TDH. In addition, in active sentences, they reliably fixated the correct picture only at sentence offset, reflecting slowed processing. During passive sentence processing, fixations were at chance throughout the sentence, but different patterns were noted for correct and incorrect trials. These results are consistent with the proposal that agrammatic sentence comprehension failure involves lexical processing and/or lexical integration deficits.

[1]  D. Swinney,et al.  An On-Line Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia , 1993, Brain and Language.

[2]  David Caplan,et al.  Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient , 1986, Brain and Language.

[3]  D. Swinney,et al.  How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia , 2008, Brain and Language.

[4]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The Effect of Speaking Rate on the Role of the Uniqueness Point in Spoken Word Recognition , 2000 .

[5]  Y. Grodzinsky.  The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  V. Fromkin,et al.  Comprehension and Acceptability Judgments in Agrammatism: Disruptions in the Syntax of Referential Dependency , 1993, Brain and Language.

[7]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses , 1989, Brain and Language.

[8]  Susan Edwards,et al.  Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia , 2004, Brain and Language.

[9]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world , 2004 .

[10]  D. Swinney,et al.  The Leaf Fell (the Leaf): The Online Processing of Unaccusatives , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  C. Thompson,et al.  What goes wrong during passive sentence production in agrammatic aphasia: An eyetracking study , 2010, Aphasiology.

[12]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Thematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: Sentence–picture matching electrified , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  C. Thompson,et al.  Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[14]  D. Swinney,et al.  On the temporal course of gap-filling during comprehension of verbal passives , 1993, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  C. Thompson,et al.  Binding in agrammatic aphasia: Processing to comprehension , 2010, Aphasiology.

[16]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  THE TIME-COURSE OF PROCESSING SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM EYE MOVEMENTS DURING SPOKEN NARRATIVES , 2001 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[18]  E. Zurif,et al.  The Critical Role of Group Studies in Neuropsychology: Comprehension Regularities in Broca's Aphasia , 1999, Brain and Language.

[19]  Alec Marantz,et al.  The minimalist program , 1995 .

[20]  Vincent J. van Heuven,et al.  Speech rate as a secondary prosodic characteristic of polarity questions in three languages , 2005, Speech Commun..

[21]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Processing empty categories: A question of visibility. , 1993 .

[22]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  Selectional restriction and semantic priming effects in normals and Broca's aphasics , 2005, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[23]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[24]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Lexical-Semantic Activation in Broca's and Wernicke's Aphasia: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Comprehension of reversible active and passive sentences in agrammatism , 2001 .

[26]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia , 1987 .

[27]  C. Thompson,et al.  Real-time comprehension of wh- movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening , 2007, Brain and Language.

[28]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Integration of Syntactic and Semantic Information in Predictive Processing: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from German and English , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[29]  M. Piñango,et al.  The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity , 2003, Brain and Language.

[30]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[31]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[32]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Bare Phrase Structure , 1994 .

[33]  Neşe Özgirgin,et al.  Sentence comprehension in Turkish Broca's aphasia: An integration problem , 2011 .

[34]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .

[35]  W. O'grady,et al.  A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits , 2005, Brain and Language.

[36]  Alan Beretta,et al.  Double-Agents and Trace-Deletion in Agrammatism , 1998, Brain and Language.

[37]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events , 2005, Cognition.

[38]  C. Thompson,et al.  Pronominal Resolution and Gap Filling in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[39]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  Chance in agrammatic sentence comprehension: What does it really mean? Evidence from eye movements of German agrammatic aphasic patients , 2011 .

[40]  Y. Grodzinsky.  Language deficits and the theory of syntax , 1986, Brain and Language.

[41]  S. Blumstein,et al.  On-Line Processing of Filler–Gap Constructions in Aphasia , 1998, Brain and Language.

[42]  Rita Sloan Berndt,et al.  Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis , 1996, Cognition.

[43]  A. Kertesz.  The Western Aphasia Battery , 1982 .

[44]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Semantic Facutation in Aphasia: Effects of Time and Expectancy , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  H. Brownell,et al.  Speed of Lexical Activation in Nonfluent Broca's Aphasia and Fluent Wernicke's Aphasia , 1997, Brain and Language.

[46]  R. de Bleser,et al.  Passives in agrammatic sentence comprehension: A German study , 2004 .

[47]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Comparing the time-course of processing initially ambiguous and unambiguous German SVO/OVS sentences in depicted events , 2007 .