Interpreting module EL images for quality control

A strong supply-side photovoltaic market coupled with increasing customer awareness of the importance of quality module manufacturing is resulting in customers increasingly dictating supply terms with manufacturers. With customers focusing on quality metrics, this in general becomes a positive development which is of benefit for high quality manufacturers. In Australia, with Australian Consumer Law leaving ultimate warranty responsibility in the hands of the local service providers, the need for these service providers to have confidence in the quality of the manufactured product is higher still. A quality control technique that is becoming increasingly important is electroluminescence (EL) testing. EL testing is useful for identifying variations in wafer quality, wafer impurities and dislocations, microcracks, front grid finger breaks, poor solder joints and shunted cells. There is a wealth of scientific literature dealing with most of these issues. Some of this information is useful for manufacturing process control and some of it is useful to customers. For example, features such as microcracks can impact a module’s durability in the field and this information is important. But other features of the EL image – such as the uniformity of EL response from the cells – has no reliable relationship to module performance. By reviewing the theory and application of module scale EL testing, interpretation of the images can be improved and areas where further work is required can be highlighted.

[1]  C. Buerhop-Lutz,et al.  Electroluminescence and Infrared Imaging for Quality Improvements of PV Modules , 2008 .

[2]  Ulrich Eitner,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of PV-Modules by Electroluminescence Images for Quality Control , 2009 .

[3]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Power loss in photovoltaic arrays due to mismatch in cell characteristics , 1979 .

[4]  C. Buerhop-Lutz,et al.  Analysis of PV Modules by Electroluminescence and IR Thermography , 2009 .

[5]  L. Podlowski,et al.  INFLUENCE OF MICRO CRACKS IN MULTI-CRYSTALLINE SILICON SOLAR CELLS ON THE RELIABILITY OF PV MODULES , 2005 .

[6]  O. Mayer,et al.  Defect Detection in Photovoltaic Modules Using Electroluminescence Imaging , 2012 .

[7]  Wilhelm Warta,et al.  Determination of local minority carrier diffusion lengths in crystalline silicon from luminescence images , 2009 .

[8]  J. Coello,et al.  Introducing Electroluminescence Technique in the Quality Control of Large PV Plants , 2011 .

[9]  Marc Köntges,et al.  Quantifying the risk of power loss in PV modules due to micro cracks , 2010 .

[10]  Christian Hagendorf,et al.  Understanding the Snail Trail Effect in Silicon Solar Modules on Microstructural Scale , 2012 .

[11]  D. Doble,et al.  Evaluation of two‐dimensional electrical properties of photovoltaic modules using bias‐dependent electroluminescence , 2012 .

[12]  I. Eusch,et al.  Quality Assurance of Crystalline Photovoltaic Modules by Using Different Characterisation Techniques , 2011 .

[13]  Ulrich Eitner,et al.  Detection of the voltage distribution in photovoltaic modules by electroluminescence imaging , 2010 .

[14]  Wilhelm Warta,et al.  Diffusion lengths of silicon solar cells from luminescence images , 2007 .

[15]  T. Fuyuki,et al.  Photographic surveying of minority carrier diffusion length in polycrystalline silicon solar cells by electroluminescence , 2005 .

[16]  Manuel Mazo,et al.  The influence of mismatch of solar cells on relative power loss of photovoltaic modules , 2013 .