The use of prosodic cues in language discrimination tasks by rats

Recent research with cotton-top tamarin monkeys has revealed language discrimination abilities similar to those found in human infants, demonstrating that these perceptual abilities are not unique to humans but are also present in non-human primates. Specifically, tamarins could discriminate forward but not backward sentences of Dutch from Japanese, using both natural and synthesized utterances. The present study was designed as a conceptual replication of the work on tamarins. Results show that rats trained in a discrimination learning task readily discriminate forward, but not backward sentences of Dutch from Japanese; the results are particularly robust for synthetic utterances, a pattern that shows greater parallels with newborns than with tamarins. Our results extend the claims made in the research with tamarins that the capacity to discriminate languages from different rhythmic classes depends on general perceptual abilities that evolved at least as far back as the rodents.

[1]  D. Abercrombie,et al.  Elements of General Phonetics , 1967 .

[2]  J D Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification function for synthetic VOT stimuli. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D. Lancker,et al.  Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part I. Recognition of backward voices , 1985 .

[4]  P R Killeen,et al.  Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. , 1987, Science.

[5]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  A precursor of language acquisition in young infants , 1988, Cognition.

[6]  William P. Fifer,et al.  Two-day-olds prefer their native language , 1993 .

[7]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[8]  Roger M. Tarpy,et al.  Contemporary Learning Theory and Research , 1997 .

[9]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  LANGUAGE DISCRIMINATION RESPONSE LATENCIES IN TWO-MONTH-OLD INFANTS , 1998 .

[10]  J. Mehler,et al.  Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  A. Lotto,et al.  Role of experience for language-specific functional mappings of vowel sounds. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Faster Orientation Latencies Toward Native Language in Two-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[13]  F. Ramus,et al.  Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. , 2000, Science.

[14]  F. Ramus,et al.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal , 1999, Cognition.

[15]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Pre lexical setting of the head complement parameter through prosody , 2000 .

[16]  Cory T. Miller,et al.  Amodal completion of acoustic signals by a nonhuman primate , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Speech Perception in Infants , 2002, Science.

[18]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.