Green property development practice in China: Costs and barriers

Abstract The promotion of sustainable practice in property development has resulted in the development of various green technologies. Will green technologies bring about additional cost to the property projects? This paper examines the costs and barriers in applying the green elements to the process of developing property projects. By conducting three case studies in China, it is found that the passive design strategy, for example, walls insulation, low-E window and solar heating appliances are comparatively inexpensive to apply as opposed to ‘active’ design strategies such as solar PV or heat pump technologies. By analyzing the additional cost of the three types of green buildings, it is concluded that the major barrier, the higher costs has hindered the extensive application of green technologies in China. A green strategy plan (GSP) is proposed to provide a vehicle for a more systematic use of green strategies to increase the sustainability of a property project. Research findings in the study provide valuable references to guide property development practice towards the sustainable agenda and the manner in which stakeholders approach or low carbon property development projects.

[1]  David R. Riley,et al.  High-Performance Green Building Design Process Modeling and Integrated Use of Visualization Tools , 2010 .

[2]  Yuansheng Pei,et al.  Housing development as an application of ecological engineering on streamside , 2009 .

[3]  B Jia,et al.  Environmental challenges of post-reform housing development in Beijing , 2005 .

[4]  K. E. Seiferlein.  Annual Energy Review 2006 , 2007 .

[5]  Lena Partzsch,et al.  Smart regulation for water innovation – the case of decentralized rainwater technology , 2009 .

[6]  Annie R. Pearce,et al.  Sustainable technologies for the building construction industry , 1995 .

[7]  Rlh Chiu.  Housing, Environment and the Community: An Overview , 1998 .

[8]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Ground source heat pump––description and preliminary results of the Eco House system , 2004 .

[9]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Environmental dimensions of residential development and the implications for local planning practice , 1992 .

[10]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Comparing the implementation of concrete recycling in the Australian and Japanese construction industries , 2009 .

[11]  John Wilson,et al.  Doing Well by Doing Good: Volunteering and Occupational Achievement among American Women , 2003 .

[12]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implications , 2001 .

[13]  Leon R. Glicksman,et al.  ENERGY CONSERVATION IN CHINESE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS: Progress and Opportunities in Design and Policy , 2001 .

[14]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study , 2011 .

[15]  David M. Gann,et al.  Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking , 2003 .

[16]  Chance W. Sparks.  Greening Affordable Housing: An Assessment of Housing under the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership Programs , 2007 .

[17]  David Root,et al.  Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment , 2006 .

[18]  P. Waide,et al.  Hurdling Financial Barriers to Low Energy Buildings: Experiences from the USA and Europe on Financial Incentives and Monetizing Building Energy Savings in Private Investment Decisions , 2006 .

[19]  Masa Noguchi.  The effect of the quality-oriented production approach on the delivery of prefabricated homes in Japan , 2003 .

[20]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Sustainable Construction : Green Building Design and Delivery , 2005 .

[21]  Rebecca L. H. Chiu.  Environmental Sustainability of Hong Kong's Housing System and the Housing Process Model , 2000 .

[22]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[23]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  End‐user requirements for green facility management , 2008 .

[24]  Barbara J. Lence,et al.  Assessing the performance of sustainable technologies for building projects , 2005 .

[25]  Michael James,et al.  Greening our built world : costs, benefits, and strategies , 2010 .

[26]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles , 2005 .