Effect of the Leakage Flows and the Upstream Platform Geometry on the Endwall Flows of a Turbine Cascade

This work describes the effect that the injection of leakage flow from a cavity into the mainstream has on the endwall flows and their interaction with a large pressure surface separation bubble in a low-pressure turbine. The effect of a step in hub diameter ahead of the blade row is also simulated. The blade profile under consideration is a typical design of modern low-pressure turbines. The tests are conducted in a low speed linear cascade. These are complemented by numerical simulations. Two different step geometries are investigated, i.e., a backward-facing step and a forward-facing step. The leakage tangential velocity and the leakage mass flow rate are also modified. It was found that the injection of leakage mass flow gives rise to a strengthening of the endwall flows independently of the leakage mass flow rate and the leakage tangential velocity. The experimental results have shown that below a critical value of the leakage tangential velocity, the net mixed-out endwall losses are not significantly altered by a change in the leakage tangential velocity. For these cases, the effect of the leakage mass flow is confined to the wall, as the inlet endwall boundary layer is pushed further away from the wall by the leakage flow. However, for values of the leakage tangential velocity around 100% of the wheel speed, there is a large increase in losses due to a stronger interaction between the endwall flows and the leakage mass flow. This gives rise to a change in the endwall flows' structure. In all cases, the presence of a forward-facing step produces a strengthening of the endwall flows and an increase of the net mixed-out endwall losses when compared with a backward-facing step. This is because of a strong interaction with the pressure surface separation bubble.

[1]  Theodore H. Okiishi,et al.  Modeling Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows in Axial-Flow Compressors , 2000 .

[2]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  Effects of Labyrinth Seal Variation on Multistage Axial Turbine Flow , 2003 .

[3]  J. J. Adamczyk,et al.  The Effect of Hub Leakage Flow on Two High Speed Axial Flow Compressor Rotors , 1997 .

[4]  Steven R. Manwaring,et al.  Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine: Part I — Experimental and Numerical Investigation , 2000 .

[5]  Jochen Gier,et al.  Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine , 2003 .

[6]  Jürgen F. Mayer,et al.  Simulation of the Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in an Axial Turbine , 2002 .

[7]  R Vazquez,et al.  Influence of the state of the inlet endwall boundary layer on the interaction between pressure surface separation and endwall flows , 2003 .

[8]  J. P. Longley,et al.  The Aerodynamic Interaction of Stator Shroud Leakage and Mainstream Flows in Compressors , 2000 .

[9]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  Effects of Upstream Platform Geometry on the Endwall Flows of a Turbine Cascade , 2005 .

[10]  C. H. Sieverding,et al.  Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in Turbine Blade Passages , 1985 .

[11]  David Cherry,et al.  Analytical Investigation of a Low Pressure Turbine With and Without Flowpath Endwall Gaps, Seals and Clearance Features , 2005 .

[12]  Steven R. Wellborn.  Details of Axial-Compressor Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows , 2001 .

[13]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  Unsteady dissipation measurements on a flat plate subject to wake passing , 2003 .

[14]  T. Shih,et al.  A New K-epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation , 1994 .

[15]  Theodore H. Okiishi,et al.  The Influence of Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows on Multistage Compressor Performance , 1999 .

[16]  Dieter Bohn,et al.  Influence of Open and Closed Shroud Cavities on the Flowfield in a 2-Stage Turbine With Shrouded Blades , 2003 .

[17]  Cengiz Camci,et al.  Mainstream Aerodynamic Effects due to Wheelspace Coolant Injection in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage: Part II — Aerodynamic Measurements in the Rotational Frame , 2001 .

[18]  L. Langston,et al.  Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines—A Review , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  Effect of the Leakage Flows and the Upstream Platform Geometry on the Endwall Flows of a Turbine Cascade , 2006 .

[20]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[21]  D. G. Gregory-Smith,et al.  Growth of Secondary Losses and Vorticity in an Axial Turbine Cascade , 1988 .