Responsibility judgments in voting scenarios

How do people assign responsibility for the outcome of an election? In previous work, we have shown that responsibility judgments in achievement contexts are affected by the probability that a person’s contribution is necessary, and by how close it was to being pivotal (Lagnado, Gerstenberg, & Zultan, 2013). Here we focus on responsibility judgments in voting scenarios. We varied the number of people in different voting committees, their political affiliations, the number of votes required for a policy to pass, which party supports the policy, and the pattern of votes (creating 170 different situations). As expected, we found that participants’ responsibility judgments increased the closer the voter was to being pivotal. Further, judgments increased the more unexpected a vote was. Voters were assigned more responsibility when they voted against the majority in the committee, and when they voted against their party affiliation.

[1]  A. Alexandrova.  The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1965, Nature.

[2]  A. Goldman.  Why Citizens Should Vote: A Causal Responsibility Approach , 1999 .

[3]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach , 2000 .

[4]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[5]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Responsibility and Blame: A Structural-Model Approach , 2003, IJCAI.

[6]  T. Tännsjö.  Moral dimensions , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach. Part I: Causes , 2000, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[8]  W. Sinnott-Armstrong,et al.  The cognitive science of morality : intuition and diversity , 2008 .

[9]  J. Knobe,et al.  Causal judgment and moral judgment: Two experiments , 2008 .

[10]  J. Knobe,et al.  Cause and Norm , 2009 .

[11]  Tobias Gerstenberg,et al.  Spreading the blame: The allocation of responsibility amongst multiple agents , 2010, Cognition.

[12]  Tobias Gerstenberg,et al.  When contributions make a difference: Explaining order effects in responsibility attribution , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[13]  Tobias Gerstenberg,et al.  Finding fault: Causality and counterfactuals in group attributions , 2012, Cognition.

[14]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[15]  Ro'i Zultan,et al.  Causal Responsibility and Counterfactuals , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Wins above replacement: Responsibility attributions as counterfactual replacements , 2014, CogSci.

[17]  Jonathan F. Kominsky,et al.  Causal superseding , 2015, Cognition.

[18]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Graded Causation and Defaults , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.