Electric powertrains : opportunities and challenges in the US light-duty vehicle fleet

Managing impending environmental and energy challenges in the transport sector requires a dramatic reduction in both the petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of in-use vehicles. This study quantifies the potential of electric and hybrid-electric powertrains, such as gasoline hybrid-electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs), fuel-cell vehicles (FCVs), and battery-electric vehicles (BEVs), to offer such reductions. The evolution of key enabling technologies was evaluated over a 30 year time horizon. These results were integrated with software simulations to model vehicle performance and tank-towheel energy consumption; the technology evaluation was also used to estimate costs. Well-towheel energy and GHG emissions of future vehicle technologies were estimated by integrating the vehicle technology evaluation with assessments of different fuel pathways. While electric powertrains can reduce or eliminate the transport sector's reliance on petroleum, their GHG and energy reduction potential are constrained by continued reliance on fossil-fuels for producing electricity and hydrogen. In addition, constraints on growth of new vehicle technologies and slow rates of fleet turnover imply that these technologies take decades to effect meaningful change. As such, they do not offer a silver bullet: new technologies must be deployed in combination with other aggressive measures such as improved conventional technology, development of low-carbon fuels and fuel production pathways, and demand-side reductions. The results do not suggest a clear winner amongst the technologies evaluated, although the hybrid vehicle is most likely to offer a dominant path through the first half of the century, based on its position as an established technology, a projection that shows continued improvement and narrowing cost relative to conventional technologies, and similar GHG reduction benefits to other technologies as long as they rely on traditional fuel pathways. The plug-in hybrid, while more costly than hybrid vehicles, offers greater opportunity to reduce GHG emissions and petroleum use, and faces lower technical risk and fewer infrastructure hurdles than fuel-cell or battery-electric vehicles. Fuel-cell vehicle technology has shown significant improvement in the last several years, but questions remain as to its technical feasibility and the relative benefit of hydrogen as a transportation fuel. Thesis Supervisor: John Heywood Sun Jae Professor of Mechanical Engineering

[1]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation energy data book , 2008 .

[2]  Rajesh K. Ahluwalia,et al.  Direct hydrogen fuel cell systems for hybrid vehicles , 2005 .

[3]  Donald R. Sadoway,et al.  Portable Power: Advanced Rechargeable Lithium Batteries , 2002 .

[4]  Menahem Anderman,et al.  Advanced Batteries for Electric Vehicles: An Assessment of Performance, Cost, and Availability , 2000 .

[5]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Simulation Study of a Series Hydraulic Hybrid Propulsion System for a Light Truck , 2007 .

[6]  Philip N. Ross,et al.  Improved Oxygen Reduction Activity on Pt3Ni(111) via Increased Surface Site Availability , 2007, Science.

[7]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[8]  Meilin Liu,et al.  Promotion of proton conduction in polymer electrolyte membranes by 1H-1,2,3-triazole. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  M. Wang,et al.  Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems North American analysis. , 2001 .

[10]  John B. Heywood,et al.  ON THE ROAD IN 2020 - A LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF NEW AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[11]  Anima B. Bose,et al.  Fuel Cells for Transportation Applications , 2009 .

[12]  Kevin P. Schneider,et al.  Impacts Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles on Electric Utilities and Regional US Power Grids: Part 1: Technical Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Isidor Buchmann Exploring a New Area in Portable Power High-Power Lithium-Ion , 2006 .

[14]  Mitch Jacoby HIGHER CAPACITY LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES: ELECTROCHEMISTRY: New cathode materials boost performance , 2007 .

[15]  T. Markel,et al.  Plug-In HEV Vehicle Design Options and Expectations , 2006 .

[16]  Douglas J. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of two fuel cell air compression systems at low load , 2001 .

[17]  Vinod K. Natarajan THE PERFORMANCE OF IC ENGINE AND FUEL CELL HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEMS IN LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES , 2002 .

[18]  Vinod K. Natarajan,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Fuel Cell Cars , 2003 .

[19]  Eric Carlson,et al.  Cost Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Systems for Transportation: September 30, 2005 , 2005 .

[20]  John M. DeCicco,et al.  Trends in Technical Efficiency Trade-Offs for the U.S. Light Vehicle Fleet , 2007 .

[21]  Mark N. Obrovac High-Performance Batteries to Transform Transportation , 2006 .

[22]  S. F. Actory,et al.  Personal correspondence , 1997 .

[23]  Venkat Srinivasan,et al.  Design and Optimization of a Natural Graphite/Iron Phosphate Lithium-Ion Cell , 2004 .

[24]  Tiffany Amber Groode A methodology for assessing MIT's energy used and greenhouse gas emissions , 2004 .

[25]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[26]  Michael Thackeray,et al.  Lithium-ion batteries: An unexpected conductor. , 2002, Nature materials.

[27]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Stabilization of Platinum Oxygen-Reduction Electrocatalysts Using Gold Clusters , 2007, Science.

[28]  Meyya Meyyappan,et al.  Hovel one-dimensional nanostructures , 2005 .

[29]  Makoto Yamazaki,et al.  Development of New-Generation Hybrid System THS II - Drastic Improvement of Power Performance and Fuel Economy , 2004 .

[30]  Mark K. Gee 2004 DOE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program Review Presentation: Cost and Performance Enhancements for a PEM Fuel Cell Turbocompressor , 2004 .

[31]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs , 2005 .

[32]  Emmanuel P Kasseris Comparative analysis of automotive powertrain choices for the near to mid-term future , 2006 .

[33]  R. Farrington,et al.  IMPACT OF VEHICLE AIR-CONDITIONING ON FUEL ECONOMY. TAILPIPE EMISSIONS, AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE RANGE: PREPRINT , 2000 .

[34]  T. Markel,et al.  Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Energy Storage System Design (Presentation) , 2006 .

[35]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: A 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment , 2006 .

[36]  A. Züttel,et al.  Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications , 2001, Nature.

[37]  T. Markel,et al.  Energy storage systems considerations for grid-charged hybrid electric vehicles , 2005, 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[38]  L. Gaines,et al.  COSTS OF LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES FOR VEHICLES , 2000 .

[39]  Tony Markel,et al.  Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Energy Storage System Design: Preprint , 2006 .

[40]  M. Broussely,et al.  Main aging mechanisms in Li ion batteries , 2005 .

[41]  A. Ritchie,et al.  Recent developments and likely advances in lithium-ion batteries , 2006 .

[42]  Sanket Desai,et al.  PEM fuel cell catalysts : Cost, performance, and durability , 2005 .

[43]  R. N. Elliott,et al.  American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy , 2002 .

[44]  G Scoit,et al.  Business as usual? , 1994, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).