CMC Technology in the Classroom: A Look From a Professors Point of View

Technology now influences every aspect of daily life. Education is no exception. This is particularly true for Eastern Illinois University. With the increase of CMC technology on campus, it is important to know how professors feel about it and identify why some professors are not using it. The specific purpose of this research was to focus on why CMC is beneficial in the classroom. This study discusses the kinds of technology available on campus and discovers the reasons why professors are reluctant to use CMC technology on campus. This study identified a significant level of technology and assistance available on campus. However, a majority of the faculty was dissatisfied and reluctant to use the technology because they perceive a lack of equipment and knowledge of how to use the equipment. CMC Classroom iii Dedication I would like to dedicate this paper to not only the professors of EIU but also to the all the professor and educators across the world. It takes a special person to stand in front of room and teach a group of people something that they may not ever use. I also like to dedicate this paper to those educators who struggle with computer anxiety. I can honestly say that working with computers is like working on a relationship, the more that you work at it the better it will be. CMC Classroom iv Acknowledgement I would like to thank my Father and Mother for their constant encouragement and late night prayers. Without their influence and patience I would not be where I am today. I have to thank my siblings Brian, Jeff, Megan, and Natalie for always asking me when I was coming home. A special thanks goes out to my Grandma and Grandpa who have touched my life in so many ways. My hat goes off to my roommates Jon, John, Adam, and Joe for continually inquiring if I was done with my thesis and for always keeping me on track by asking me to join them at a bar during the week. I have to thank all the members of the EIU Ice Hockey Team for their understanding and patience with me during this past year, especially P.J. and Paul. I will miss the late night practices and the unforgettable road trips. I would also like to thank all the teachers who believed in me and never gave up on me. The teachers at EID that deserve thanks are Helsel, Merritt, Hogg, Greer, Muhr, Rife, Mills, Bock, Semati, Zordani, Ingram, Perkins and Walker. A special recognition goes to Dr. Borzi for being so accommodating and patient with me. Thank you Sara and Tim for being there for me when I needed your help. To the rest ofTA's in the office, it's been an unforgettable experience. An extraordinary thanks goes to a girl who was there with me when I started this journey. No matter what happens between us Lauren, you will always have a special place in my heart. The most important thanks though goes to the Father, his Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen. Table of

[1]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes: It Depends on What You Ask. , 1996 .

[2]  Hussein M. Yaghi,et al.  The Role of the Computer in the School as Perceived by Computer Using Teachers and School Administrators , 1996 .

[3]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[4]  A. Anderson.  Predictors of Computer Anxiety and Performance in Information Systems , 1996 .

[5]  Lois J. Baron,et al.  Gender differences in attributions about microcomputer learning in elementary school , 1995 .

[6]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[7]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  Validation Studies of a New Computer Attitude Scale , 1986 .

[8]  Kenneth L. Hacker,et al.  Issues in predicting user acceptance of computer‐mediated communication (CMC) in inter‐university classroom discussion as an alternative to face‐to‐face interaction , 1997 .

[9]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[10]  June Malloy Ingram,et al.  Who's Teaching the Teacher: Elementary Education and the Computer. , 1992 .

[11]  Valerie L. Worthington,et al.  Existential Computer Anxiety and Changes in Computer Technology: What Past Research on Computer Anxiety Has Missed , 1999 .

[12]  Candice Hollingsead,et al.  Engaging Preservice Teachers in Hypermedia Authoring: Process and Outcomes , 1997 .

[13]  C. Reznich.  Applying minimalist design principles to the problem of computer anxiety , 1996 .

[14]  Pamela F. Wendt,et al.  Interrogative strategies and information exchange in computer‐mediated communication , 1999 .

[15]  Jerry Willis,et al.  Technology and teacher education , 1991 .

[16]  J. Woodrow.  A Comparison of Four Computer Attitude Scales , 1991 .

[17]  Judith B. Harris,et al.  Correlates Among Teachers’ Anxieties, Demographics, and Telecomputing Activity , 1996 .

[18]  R. Rice,et al.  Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. , 1991 .

[19]  J. Cooper,et al.  Gender, Computer-Assisted Learning, and Anxiety: With a Little Help from a Friend , 1996 .

[20]  D. McInerney,et al.  Student Teachers, Computer Anxiety and Computer Experience , 1994 .

[21]  Soner Yıldırım.  Effects of an Educational Computing Course on Preservice and Inservice Teachers , 2000 .

[22]  Harrison Hao Yang,et al.  An Investigation of Computer Anxiety among Vocational-Technical Teachers. , 1996 .

[23]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[24]  Glenda A. Gunter,et al.  Teaching Pre-service Teachers Technology: An Innovative Approach , 1998 .

[25]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[26]  David J. Ayersman.  Effects of computer instruction, learning style, gender, and experience on computer anxiety , 1996 .

[27]  Dorothy Jo Stevens,et al.  Educators' Perceptions of Computers in Education: 1979 and 1981 , 1982 .