New femoral designs: do they influence stress shielding?

Virtually all contemporary cementless femoral hip stems are designed with the goals of achieving immediate and long-term stability, restoring hip mechanics, and minimizing thigh pain. However, the incorporation of features specifically intended to minimize stress-mediated bone resorption (stress shielding) has been variable. Attempts to reduce bone loss through stem design have yielded inconsistent results and, in certain instances, early and catastrophic failure. Prior beliefs regarding the determinants of stress shielding were based upon the qualitative assessment of bone loss using plain radiographs. These are being challenged, particularly with regard to the role of porous coating level. This is in large part due to the refinement and widespread availability of dual-energy xray absorptiometry (DEXA), which allows quantitative assessment of bone mineral density both pre- and postoperatively. The available evidence indicates stem stiffness plays a dominant role. Progressive bone loss through stress shielding has potentially dire consequences. While such problems have not manifested as severe or widespread clinical issues, the preservation of femoral bone stock is an important and desirable goal.

[1]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur , 1997 .

[2]  C. Engh,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Consequences of Stress-Shielding after Total Hip Arthroplasty without Cement* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: clinical versus computer-simulation studies. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[4]  D. Scott,et al.  Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  A. Yee,et al.  A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  R. Geesink,et al.  Six-year results of hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Effect of Alendronate on Periprosthetic Bone Loss After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A One-Year, Randomized, Controlled Trial of 19 Patients , 2002, Calcified Tissue International.

[8]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Load transfer and stress shielding of the hydroxyapatite-ABG hip: a study of stem length and proximal fixation. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  R. Eastell,et al.  Effect of Pamidronate in Preventing Local Bone Loss After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Controlled Trial , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  J. Osborn,et al.  Fixation of hip prostheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatings. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  B. Kiratli,et al.  Determination of bone mineral density by dual X‐ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  D. Lennox,et al.  Minimum 4-year follow-up of the PCA total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients. , 1992, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  S. P. Butler,et al.  Measurement of periprosthetic bone density in hip arthroplasty using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Reproducibility of measurements. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  W. Capello,et al.  Remodeling of Bone around Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  M. A. Ali,et al.  Early failure of a carbon-fiber composite femoral component. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  C. Engh,et al.  Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  W H Harris,et al.  Quantification of Implant Micromotion, Strain Shielding, and Bone Resorption With Porous‐Coated Anatomic Medullary Locking Femoral Prostheses , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  J. Galante,et al.  Mechanisms of bone loss associated with total hip replacement. , 1993, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[20]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses. A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric study. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  R. Wixson,et al.  Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Effect of flexibility of the femoral stem on bone-remodeling and fixation of the stem in a canine total hip arthroplasty model without cement. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  C. Engh,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty: Concerns With Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Components , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  H. Cameron The 3-6-year results of a modular noncemented low-bending stiffness hip implant. A preliminary study. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  D. Scott,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty with hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  M. Freeman,et al.  Hydroxyapatite coating of hip prostheses. Effect on migration into the femur. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  W J Maloney,et al.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  J. Visser,et al.  High failure rate of soft-interface stem coating for fixation of femoral endoprostheses. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  C. Engh,et al.  The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Radiographic Assessment of Stress-Shielding: A Postmortem Analysis* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A Low Stiffness Composite Biologically Fixed Prosthesis , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Clodronate prevents prosthetic migration: A randomized radiostereometric study of 50 total knee patients , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[33]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[34]  R. Eberle,et al.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. Methods and preliminary results. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  P. Herberts,et al.  Evaluation of a Femoral Stem with Reduced Stiffness: A Randomized Study with Use of Radiostereometry and Bone Densitometry , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  V. Finsen,et al.  Accuracy of visually estimated bone mineratization in routine radiographs of the lower extremity , 2004, Skeletal Radiology.

[37]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[38]  H. Tullos,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty with a low-modulus porous-coated femoral component. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  M. Salzer,et al.  Comparison of migration in modular sockets with ceramic and polyethylene inlays. , 2000, Orthopedics.

[40]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral component: a minimum 6-year follow-up. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[42]  F Kainberger,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[43]  Bobyn Jd,et al.  The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[44]  Engh Ca,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988 .

[45]  W. Hozack,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems. A Matched-Pair Analysis of Coated and Uncoated Implants* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[46]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study of cemented, hydroxyapatite-coated, and porous-coated stems with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[47]  K. Bachus,et al.  Postmortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patient. A case study. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[48]  D. Bokor,et al.  Anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint with humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament. A review of 41 cases. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[49]  L. Dorr,et al.  Bilateral total hip arthroplasty comparing hydroxyapatite coating to porous-coated fixation. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[50]  W H Harris,et al.  A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[51]  T. Hearn,et al.  Radiographic appearance and structural properties of proximal femoral bone in total hip arthroplasty patients. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[52]  C. Engh,et al.  Influence of Porous Coating Level on Proximal Femoral Remodeling: A Postmortem Analysis , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[53]  C. Bünger,et al.  Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[54]  J. Galante,et al.  Maintenance of Proximal Cortical Bone with Use of a Less Stiff Femoral Component in Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip without Cement. An Investigation in a Canine Model at Six Months and Two Years* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[55]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Alendronate Reduces Periprosthetic Bone Loss After Uncemented Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[56]  J. Bobyn,et al.  Mechanical compatibility of noncemented hip prostheses with the human femur. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[57]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Proximally coated ingrowth prostheses. A review. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.