No benefit from D-amphetamine when added to physiotherapy after stroke: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Objective: To assess the effect of D-amphetamine on the recovery of activities of daily living and motor functions after stroke, Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled study, Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation centre, Subjects: Twenty-four stroke survivors after a first ischaemic supratentorial stroke within six weeks before study onset, severely to moderately affected, with a Barthel Index (0–100) ranging from 25 to 50, no severe concomitant internal, neurological or psychiatric diseases, and participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation programme of 10–12 weeks, Interventions: Ten sessions with 10 mg D-amphetamine (or placebo) every fourth day totalling 100 mg in a time period of 36 days combined with physical therapy according to the neurodevelopmental concept within 60 minutes after drug intake. Main outcome measures: Barthel Index (0–100) served as the primary outcome measure and the Rivermead Motor Assessment Score with its three sections (gross function, leg and trunk, and arm) as the secondary outcome measure, assessed at days 0, 20, 36, 90, 180 and 360. Results: The two groups did not differ with respect to clinical data and outcome measures at study onset. All patients improved significantly except for arm function over the intervention period and up to day 90 after study onset. The comparison between groups did not reveal any difference at any time; amphetamine-treated patients did not show any increase in motor function or ADL compared with the control group. Conclusions: The placebo-controlled study failed to show any effect of D-amphetamine on stroke recovery compared with control. The small number of patients, the timing and content of physical therapy were limiting factors of the present study. Further trials are warranted.

[1]  Joseph Classen,et al.  Modulation of use-dependent plasticity by d-amphetamine. , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[2]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  D-amphetamine does not improve outcome of somatosensory training , 2001, Neurology.

[3]  M. Viitanen,et al.  A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effects of Amphetamine and Physiotherapy after Stroke , 2001, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[4]  DelainaWalker-Batson,et al.  Amphetamine Paired With Physical Therapy Accelerates Motor Recovery After Stroke , 1995 .

[5]  D. Walker-Batson,et al.  Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Further evidence. , 1995, Stroke.

[6]  M. Maležič,et al.  Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. , 1995, Stroke.

[7]  T. Olsen,et al.  Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  L. Goldstein Basic and Clinical Studies of Pharmacologic Effects on Recovery from Brain Injury , 1993, Journal of neural transplantation & plasticity.

[11]  B Cooper,et al.  Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. , 1990, Stroke.

[12]  D. Wade,et al.  Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. , 1990, International disability studies.

[13]  C. Granger,et al.  The stroke rehabilitation outcome study--Part I: General description. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  James N. Davis,et al.  Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[15]  C. Granger,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation outcome studies: comparison of a Japanese facility with 17 U.S. facilities. , 1988, International disability studies.

[16]  Patricia M. Davies,et al.  Steps to follow : ボバース概念にもとづく片麻痺の治療法 , 1987 .

[17]  D. Hovda,et al.  Amphetamine with experience promotes recovery of locomotor function after unilateral frontal cortex injury in the cat , 1984, Brain Research.

[18]  D. M. Feeney,et al.  Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. , 1982, Science.

[19]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[20]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .