Non-universal usability?: a survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users

Most research assumes that usability is understood similarly by users in different cultures, implying that the notion of usability, its aspects, and their interrelations are constant across cultures. The present study shows that this is not the case for a sample of 412 users from China and Denmark, who differ in how they understand and prioritize different aspects of usability. Chinese users appear to be more concerned with visual appearance, satisfaction, and fun than Danish users; Danish users prioritize effectiveness, efficiency, and lack of frustration higher than Chinese users. The results suggest that culture influences perceptions of usability. We discuss implications for usability research and for usability practice.

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[2]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Culturability in Mobile Data Services: A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between Cultural Characteristics and User-Experience Attributes , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Joseph S. Dumas,et al.  Understanding the Usability Construct: User-Perceived Usbility , 2004 .

[4]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  From the user interface to the consumer interface: results from a global experiment , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  P. Honold.  Learning How to Use a Cellular Phone : Comparison Between German and Chinese Users , 2022 .

[6]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score , 2005, CHI.

[7]  Robert M. Schumacher,et al.  Overcoming the challenges of multinational testing , 2005, INTR.

[8]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures , 2007, CHI.

[9]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Cultural differences in the online behavior of consumers , 2002, CACM.

[10]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  User-centered System Design , 2011 .

[11]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  Global and intercultural user-interface design , 2002 .

[12]  Huatong Sun.  Exploring cultural usability , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

[13]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues , 1997, CHI.

[14]  Rob Kling,et al.  Organizational usability of digital libraries: case study of legal research in civil and criminal courts , 1997 .

[15]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  International users interface , 1996 .

[17]  R. Darlington,et al.  Factor Analysis , 2008 .

[18]  L. F. Molerio-Leon,et al.  Survey Methods , 2011 .

[19]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[20]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Masaaki Kurosu,et al.  Determinants of the Apparent Usability , 1995 .

[22]  Anna Rita Fasolino,et al.  Lo Standard ISO/IEC 9126 – Software engineering – Product Quality , 2010 .

[23]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Good computing systems for everyone – how on earth? Cultural aspects , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  M. Kurosu,et al.  Determinants of the apparent usability [user interfaces] , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[25]  Albert N. Badre,et al.  Culturability: the merging of culture and usability , 1998 .

[26]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  Usability Constructs: A Cross-Cultural Study of How Users and Developers Experience Their Use of Information Systems , 2007, HCI.

[30]  R. Nisbett.  The geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently--and why , 2003 .

[31]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.

[32]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  The Role of Culture in Interface Acceptance , 1997, INTERACT.

[33]  Pia Honold,et al.  Culture and Context: An Empirical Study for the Development of a Framework for the Elicitation of Cultural Influence in Product Usage , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Andreas Beu,et al.  Engineering Joy , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[35]  Michael Burmester,et al.  Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal , 2000, CHI.

[36]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[37]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[38]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[39]  Ewa Callahan,et al.  Interface design and culture , 2006, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Mick McGee.  Master usability scaling: magnitude estimation and master scaling applied to usability measurement , 2004, CHI '04.

[41]  Peter V. Miller,et al.  Web Survey Methods Introduction , 2008 .

[42]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations [2nd edition]: Geert Hofstede , 2005 .

[43]  Gerrit C. van der Veer,et al.  Breaking Down Usability , 1999, INTERACT.

[44]  Fahri Yetim,et al.  Global human-computer systems: cultural determinants of usability , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[45]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  AIS Electronic , 2022 .