Pitfalls of and controversies in cluster randomization trials.

It is now well known that standard statistical procedures become invalidated when applied to cluster randomized trials in which the unit of inference is the individual. A resulting consequence is that researchers conducting such trials are faced with a multitude of design choices, including selection of the primary unit of inference, the degree to which clusters should be matched or stratified by prognostic factors at baseline, and decisions related to cluster subsampling. Moreover, application of ethical principles developed for individually randomized trials may also require modification. We discuss several topics related to these issues, with emphasis on the choices that must be made in the planning stages of a trial and on some potential pitfalls to be avoided.

[1]  Evangelos Evangelou,et al.  Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: the cholesterol education and research trial (CEART). , 2005, Contemporary clinical trials.

[2]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[3]  O. Ukoumunne.  A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Liam Smeeth,et al.  Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: data from the MRC Trial of the Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[5]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Clustered encouragement designs with individual noncompliance: bayesian inference with randomization, and application to advance directive forms. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[6]  J. Albert.  Estimating efficacy in clinical trials with clustered binary responses , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  S. Kaasa,et al.  Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care , 2002, Palliative medicine.

[8]  M Eccles,et al.  Why does primary care need more implementation research? , 2001, Family practice.

[9]  M. Mugford,et al.  WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care , 2001, The Lancet.

[10]  K. Brandt,et al.  Educational Program for Physicians to Reduce Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Among Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2001, Medical care.

[11]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[12]  M K Campbell,et al.  Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  J. Hutton,et al.  Are distinctive ethical principles required for cluster randomized controlled trials? , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  David J Torgerson,et al.  Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  A. Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomised Trials , 2001 .

[16]  P Diehr,et al.  Selected statistical issues in group randomized trials. , 2001, Annual review of public health.

[17]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[18]  Allan Donner,et al.  Cluster randomization trials , 2000 .

[19]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[20]  Richard J Lilford,et al.  Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials , 1999, BMJ.

[21]  Donner Allan,et al.  Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the intraclass kappa statistic , 1999 .

[22]  M. Halloran,et al.  Design and interpretation of vaccine field studies. , 1999, Epidemiologic reviews.

[23]  D. Kendrick,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years , 1998, BMJ.

[24]  B. Brody.  The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective , 1998 .

[25]  J. Demakis,et al.  Cooperative studies in health services research in the Department of Veterans Affairs. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[26]  A. Diez-Roux,et al.  Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[27]  D Johnston,et al.  Implications of the results of community intervention trials. , 1998, Annual review of public health.

[28]  H. Feldman.  Selecting end point variables for a community intervention trial , 1997 .

[29]  S G Thompson,et al.  The design and analysis of paired cluster randomized trials: an application of meta-analysis techniques. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  A Donner,et al.  The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Fitting a routine health-care activity into a randomized trial: an experiment possible without informed consent? , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  R J Carroll,et al.  On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[33]  A Donner,et al.  Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  P Diehr,et al.  Breaking the matches in a paired t-test for community interventions when the number of pairs is small. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  Mitchell H. Gail,et al.  Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. cohort results from a four-year community intervention. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[36]  A Donner,et al.  Statistical implications of the choice between a dichotomous or continuous trait in studies of interobserver agreement. , 1994, Biometrics.

[37]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Vitamin A supplementation and child mortality. A meta-analysis. , 1993, JAMA.

[38]  T D Koepsell,et al.  The effect of matching on the power of randomized community intervention studies. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  J M Neuhaus,et al.  Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses , 1992, Statistical methods in medical research.

[40]  G. Rose,et al.  Alcohol and Drugs: the Scottish Experience , 1993 .

[41]  A. Kristal,et al.  Selected methodological issues in evaluating community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs. , 1992, Annual review of public health.

[42]  J. Katz,et al.  Efficacy of vitamin A in reducing preschool child mortality in Nepal , 1991, The Lancet.

[43]  H. Goldberg,et al.  The ethics of ongoing randomization trials. Investigation among intimates. , 1991, Medical care.

[44]  M Zelen,et al.  Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: an update. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[45]  D L Kaiser,et al.  Two randomized controlled trials of virucidal nasal tissues in the prevention of natural upper respiratory infections. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[46]  S. Doxiadis,et al.  Ethical Dilemmas in Health Promotion , 1987 .

[47]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Analysis of data from multiclinic trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[48]  Jerome Cornfield,et al.  SYMPOSIUM ON CHD PREVENTION TRIALS: DESIGN ISSUES IN TESTING LIFE STYLE INTERVENTIONRANDOMIZATION BY GROUP: A FORMAL ANALYSIS , 1978 .

[49]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .