Further development of the case-only design for assessing gene-environment interaction: evaluation of and adjustment for bias.

BACKGROUND The case-only study for investigating gene-environment interactions provides increased statistical efficiency over case-control analyses. This design has been criticized for being susceptible to bias arising from non-independence between the genetic and environmental factors in the population. Given that independence is critical to the validity of case-only estimates of interaction, researchers frequently use controls to evaluate whether the independence assumption is tenable, as advised in the literature. Our work investigates to what extent this approach is appropriate and how non-independence can be accounted for in case-only analyses. METHODS We provide a formula in epidemiological terms that illustrates the relationship between the gene-environment association measured among controls and the gene-environment association in the source population. Using this formula, we conducted sensitivity analyses to describe the circumstances in which controls can be used as proxy for the source population when evaluating gene-environment independence. Lastly, we generated hypothetical cohort data to examine whether multivariable modelling approaches can be used to control for non-independence. RESULTS Our sensitivity analyses show that controls should not be used to evaluate gene-environment independence in the population, even when the baseline risk of disease is low (i.e. 1%), and the interaction and independent effects are moderate (i.e. risk ratio = 2). When the factors are associated, it is possible to remove bias arising from non-independence using standard statistical multivariable techniques in case-only analyses. CONCLUSIONS Even when the disease risk is low, evaluation of gene-environment independence in controls does not provide a consistent test for bias in the case-only study. Given that control for non-independence is possible when the source of the non-independence can be conceptualized, the case-only design may still be a useful epidemiological tool for examining gene-environment interactions.

[1]  Y. Yamaji,et al.  Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese , 2004, Gut.

[2]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Detection of interaction involving identified genes: available study designs. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[3]  Jennifer H Barrett,et al.  Flexible matching in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Silke Schmidt,et al.  Reproductive factors and familial predisposition for breast cancer by age 50 years. A case-control-family study for assessing main effects and possible gene-environment interaction. , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  M. Toruner,et al.  Barrett's esophagus: Prevalence and its relationship with dyspeptic symptoms , 2004, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[6]  D J Schaid,et al.  Potential misinterpretation of the case-only study to assess gene-environment interaction. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  C R Weinberg,et al.  Designing and analysing case-control studies to exploit independence of genotype and exposure. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  W D Flanders,et al.  Nontraditional epidemiologic approaches in the analysis of gene-environment interaction: case-control studies with no controls! , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  E. Bowman,et al.  Environmental tobacco smoke, genetic susceptibility, and risk of lung cancer in never-smoking women. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  W. Willett,et al.  A Prospective Study of Aspirin Use and the Risk for Colorectal Adenoma , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  J D Kalbfleisch,et al.  On the use of case series to identify disease risk factors. , 1984, Biometrics.

[12]  D. Labuda,et al.  Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Associated with Parental Alcohol Consumption and Polymorphisms of Carcinogen-Metabolizing Genes , 2002, Epidemiology.

[13]  J. Chang-Claude,et al.  The patched polymorphism Pro1315Leu (C3944T) may modulate the association between use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[14]  D. Hunter,et al.  Association of NAT2 and smoking in relation to breast cancer incidence in a population-based case–control study (United States) , 2003, Cancer Causes & Control.

[15]  H. Brenner,et al.  Interaction between alcohol dehydrogenase II gene, alcohol consumption, and risk for breast cancer , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  M J Khoury,et al.  Evolving methods in genetic epidemiology. III. Gene-environment interaction in epidemiologic research. , 1997, Epidemiologic reviews.

[17]  S Wacholder,et al.  Parity, oral contraceptives, and the risk of ovarian cancer among carriers and noncarriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  A. Bergen,et al.  Cigarette smoking. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  David Clayton,et al.  Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases , 2001, The Lancet.

[20]  W D Flanders,et al.  Case-only design to measure gene-gene interaction. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[21]  R. Pyke,et al.  Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies , 1979 .

[22]  P Vineis,et al.  Cigarette smoking, N-acetyltransferase 2 acetylation status, and bladder cancer risk: a case-series meta-analysis of a gene-environment interaction. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[23]  A. Miller,et al.  A cohort study of oral contraceptive use and risk of benign breast disease , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[24]  P S Albert,et al.  Limitations of the case-only design for identifying gene-environment interactions. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  D. Labuda,et al.  Risk of childhood leukemia associated with exposure to pesticides and with gene polymorphisms. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[26]  M. Marion,et al.  A common polymorphism in XRCC1 as a biomarker of susceptibility for chemically induced genetic damage , 2003, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[27]  M J Khoury,et al.  Commentary: facing the challenge of gene-environment interaction: the two-by-four table and beyond. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  Jack A. Taylor,et al.  Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.