The role of the verb in grammatical function assignment in English and Korean.

One of the central questions in speech production is how speakers decide which entity to assign to which grammatical function. According to the lexical hypothesis (e.g., Bock & Levelt, 1994), verbs play a key role in this process (e.g., "send" and "receive" result in different entities being assigned to the subject position). In contrast, according to the structural hypothesis (e.g., Bock, Irwin, & Davidson, 2004), grammatical functions can be assigned based on a speaker's conceptual representation of an event, even before a particular verb is chosen. In order to examine the role of the verb in grammatical function assignment, we investigated whether English and Korean speakers exhibit semantic interference effects for verbs during a scene description task. We also analyzed speakers' eye movements during production. We found that English speakers exhibited verb interference effects and also fixated the action/verb region before the subject region. In contrast, Korean speakers did not show any verb interference effects and did not fixate the action/verb region before the subject region. Rather, in Korean, looks to the action/verb region sharply increased following looks to the object region. The findings provide evidence for the lexical hypothesis for English and are compatible with the structural hypothesis for Korean. We suggest that whether the verb is retrieved before speech onset depends on the role that the verb plays in grammatical function assignment or structural choice in a particular language.

[1]  James R. Lindsley Producing simple utterances: How far ahead do we plan? , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  K Ball,et al.  Putting first things first. , 1999, Today's surgical nurse.

[3]  David P. Vinson,et al.  Naming action in Japanese: Effects of semantic similarity and grammatical class , 2008 .

[4]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study , 1982, Cognition.

[5]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[6]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words , 1983, Cognition.

[7]  John C Trueswell,et al.  Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  On the semantic content of subcategorization frames , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Noriko Iwasaki,et al.  Incremental Sentence Production: Observations from Elicited Speech Errors in Japanese , 2010 .

[11]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[12]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding , 2001, Cognition.

[13]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[14]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[15]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic Category Interference in Overt Picture Naming: Sharpening Current Density Localization by PCA , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[17]  J. Hawkins Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[18]  L. Gleitman,et al.  On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  Thomas Pechmann,et al.  The activation of word class information during speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Syntax in Language Production: An Approach Using Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 2011 .

[21]  David P. Vinson,et al.  Semantic similarity and grammatical class in naming actions , 2005, Cognition.

[22]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[23]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Application of eye tracking in speech production research , 2003 .

[24]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[25]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[26]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[27]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology , 2011 .

[28]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[29]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[30]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world , 2004 .

[31]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Jong-Bok Kim,et al.  Oblique case marking on core arguments in Korean , 2008 .

[33]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases , 1994 .

[34]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[35]  Stacey A. Hancock Modern Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A Practical Introduction , 2012 .

[36]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[37]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[38]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .

[39]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[40]  Dave Kleinschmidt,et al.  Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[41]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Minding the clock , 2003 .

[42]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian , 1984 .

[43]  Koenraad De Smedt,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF INCREMENTAL GRAMMATICAL ENCODING , 2006 .

[44]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Reversing the hands of time: changing the mapping from seeing to saying. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  A. L. Blumenthal Language and Psychology: Historical Aspects of Psycholinguistics , 1970 .

[47]  J. Hawkins Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it , 2007 .

[48]  益子 真由美 Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[49]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .

[50]  Gregory Ward,et al.  The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing , 2016 .

[51]  G. Altmann,et al.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm , 2005, Cognition.

[52]  Betty J. Birner,et al.  Information status and noncanonical word order in English , 1998 .

[53]  F. Ferreira,et al.  How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .

[54]  W. Levelt,et al.  Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[56]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[57]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs , 1993, Cognition.

[58]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Little houses and casas pequeñas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish , 2008, Cognition.

[59]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Lexical selection and verbal self-monitoring: Effects of lexicality, context, and time pressure in picture-word interference , 2012 .

[60]  V. Ferreira,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Language Production , 2014 .

[61]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Producing Simple Sentences: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1998 .

[62]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[63]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  The mind's eye : cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2003 .

[64]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[65]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[67]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  Thomas Pechmann,et al.  The time course of recovery for grammatical category information during lexical processing for syntactic construction. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.